That would be far too consumer friendly, it's easier to screw people with DRM so that you can sell crap instead.

The man has it right. I never sold my copy of Burnout Paradise (PS3) because it had too much value and replayability. While every game can't be open world and with good multiplayer, a game you may want to replay because it's that good is the first step.

Stop making 6/8 hour linear experiences with dull gameplay and people won't want to sell them on. If a game is like that then make it cheaper. Used games do not harm anyone, they keep the market flowing from top to bottom. Fact. Has been a fact since the first Consoles (Atari VCS etc).

MS don't care about gaming they care about profit and domination and have hurt gaming in many ways since entering the console space. The only thing they improved was online/networking forcing the others to improve but their practice of timed exclusive/fragmenting players/buying out PC destined games etc (bought with their massive funds) and now the DRM stuff has been nothing but an attack on gaming/gamers. Sony invest in studios for their exclusives, Microsoft are 'bullies' who just pay people off to spoil everyone else's fun, hardly gamer centric is it?

The sooner they get out of the console race the better for all gamers (they even hurt PC gamers with the Xbox by keeping games away from PC and putting that horrible GFWL on it). On the PC the only half decent result was we had a somewhat standardised (good) controller in the Xbox 360 wireless pad.

So Nintendo and Sony 'get it' and will hopefully survive to overcome the douchery of microsoft for many years.

As I've always said, If you make a good replayable game then people will keep them. If you make a short dull and boring sp and think people will want to pay $60 and keep the game then I'd recommend the dev/publishers to wake up from their dreams.