920°

Sony: 'Of Course' PS4 Can Do Cloud Computing

Shacknews writes: "Microsoft has been keen to promote Xbox One's use of the cloud. Xbox One's official website, for example, states that "thanks to the power of the cloud, Xbox One will keep getting better." Cloud computing supposedly makes Xbox One four times more powerful. It also justifies why Xbox One is effectively an always-on console."

"But what about Sony's next-gen machine? Sure, it can stream games via the cloud-powered Gaikai. But can it also follow Microsoft's step in offloading computation to the cloud? "Of course," Sony's Shuhei Yoshida said."

Read Full Story >>
shacknews.com
iGAM3R-VIII4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

So I guess this is another thing that PS4 has matched the X1 with, well then One can only assume that the PS4 will annihilate One product...

http://i.minus.com/ibmJ8clQ...

^gif seems appropriate...

US8F4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

Consumers first, Gaming second, and everything else last, that would be the reason for PS4's success. Xbox One, well, they got it all backwards.

Destrania4645d ago

Consumers/developers first

Army_of_Darkness4645d ago

Is it really necessary to chop off xbone's last leg to stand on??! Do you really need MS to crawl it's way to Next Gen?? :-D

abzdine4645d ago

This is where gaikai will show the world how cloud really works.

Greatness awaits
4>1

SonicRush154645d ago

I think shuhei wouldn't have said anything about cloud unless some one asked lol

fr0sty4645d ago

@Sonic

That's because he knows that offloading computation to the cloud in this day and age is so limited in use that it is pretty much worthless. Where people do have the bandwidth to perform limited computational tasks, it isn't always steady. Rural areas do good to get 3mbps with terrible latency. Why hype features only a percentage of us will actually get to enjoy? Why hype them beyond what they are actually capable of? I know why... He knows the hardware in PS4 is more than adequate. He doesn't have to blow clouds of smoke up everyone's ass to make us think PS4 will hold it's own. No smoke and mirrors, just simple math. 4>1.

dcbronco4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

So we've gone from the cloud being a marketing gimmick to it suddenly being a viable tool. I guess it doesn't exist until Sony says so. At least fosty is consistent.

FITgamer4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

@dc did you even read the article? He just said it could be implemented. It's not like SONY is banking on the cloud like M$ going around spreading BS saying their console will be 4x as powerful because of the cloud. The PS4 will be more powerful than X1 because of hardware and no one can deny that. Even the author said it's all still "rubbish" at the end.

Hicken4645d ago

Slap yourself.

Sony saying they're capable doesn't make it any more viable. And, frankly, nobody's saying that it does.

Well, except you.

ABizzel14645d ago

I've been saying this for the longest since it's what Gaikai and Onlive were doing to begin with. The PS4 has the benefit of having Gaikai as it's service, because they can follow the same method Gaikai used. Run all the games on top end PC's and stream them to the consoles.

That prevents the need for cloud computing to begin with if you can simply stream the game for a PC that runs the with higher settings. The cost is games will likely on run in 1080p @ 30fps streaming and may have suffer from lag depending on your connection (which will also effect cloud computing).

PS4 has the advantage technology wise with the cloud, the advantage X1 has is the sheer number of servers they'll have, but this will become less of an issue now that PlayStation 4 gamers are required to purchase PS+ to play online (which will likely increase Sony's server count, but they still have to play catch up with MS who has 8 years of XBLG backing them).

dcbronco4645d ago

I don't need to read the article. I'm commenting on fake people that claimed it wasn't possible. That is until Sony says they could do it too. It's just like every other made up complaint.

MS makes you pay twice for your game because of charging for Live. Oh Sony's doing it too. It's not a big deal. I understand it cost a lot money to run servers and provide those services.

I like that game. No longer a Sony exclusive. It doesn't look that good, I'll skip that one.

thereapersson4645d ago

The difference here is, Sony isn't charging to access things like Netflix, et cetera. MS is the king of making you pay twice just to access services you are already paying for. Someone who never plays multiplayer on PS4 will never have to sign up for PlayStation Plus if they don't want to, nor will they have to keep a persistent internet connection active.

Ritsujun4645d ago

It hurts to watch MS slapping themselves.

/lol

MRMagoo1234645d ago

@dcbronco

None said it wasnt possible ppl have just been saying and showing with evidence that it wont work the way MS keeps saying it will, it wont increase the power of the console by 4 times thats a fact, the only reason they came out with this crap was because sony revealed a more powerful console than they where expecting so they had to make some BS pr to dribble forth and hope ppl eat it.

I dont think sony could do what MS says they are gonna do either. There is way to much involved for MS plans to work the only things it can benefit is static things in games that dont need real time calculations.Even in 10 years from now they wont be doing what MS has claimed they will do.

badz1494645d ago

the PS3s around the world has been taking part in the Folding@HOME project which is a derivative of cloud computing to assist in research for disease and cancer early 2007! the PS3 has done cloud computing like 6 years ago, so why doubt the PS4? like they said...OF COURSE PS4 can do cloud computing!

jon12344645d ago

it should be developers first, because if they get treated right, we get good games :)

wellard4645d ago

lets discuss the ms business model.

Shareholders, NSA, NFL, PBS, ABC, BBC, ITV, Sky, Kinect shovelware, Developers then games and
gamers. I dont understand why its getting so much bad press /s

Baka-akaB4644d ago

@dcbronco

Do you even lsiten to yourself ? Any online machine can do cloud computing technically . The difference lies with the claims and BS about what's realistically possible with it .

One dropbox or sky drive account , and suddenly now everone is an expert in an old tech with a new coat of marketing mpainting geez ...

Kleptic4644d ago (Edited 4644d ago )

^i see what you're saying...but cloud storage and cloud processing are two completely different animals...

My opinion, mostly because i work for a cloud processing start up through Cisco...this is NOT relevant to gaming...yet...

I almost guarantee there isn't a single person on this website that has access to a residential connection that can utilize any degree of cloud processing in a real time environment...cloud processing is currently a great way to mimic a rendering farm, not a real time 'super computer' that will quickly interact back with you...

and before people start up the 'my ISP has 100mbps down!!!'...not relevant...thats a peak download speed, and doesn't address anything in terms of network latency...residential connections are not built for this...ISP's like the control of slowly dealing with 'requests' (an uploaded packet from your devices), but then quickly plumbing what you requested back to you (like streaming a video)...No current ISP's handle requests and pushes the same, which creates a situation where your device is extremely slow to be heard, but then given what it wants relatively quickly after...the conversation between your device and the 'cloud' is extremely lob-sided...even with a 'fast' connection...ISP's have fundamentally built their infrastructure this way, there is no secret way to fix this without fully rebuilding it...which, oddly, is something both MS and Sony have side stepped when talking about it...

and this is simply why neither Sony, nor MS, are anywhere close to a cloud processed real time gaming environment...no way to spin that in any positive way...MS loves saying 'well the cloud will process the fog in the back ground' or some shat like that...if the cloud is doing it, it will be such a low priority bit of processing that it won't be noticeable...and could've easily been done by better optimization to begin with...

Sony and MS may be ready for it...but your, and my, ISP isn't anywhere close...and they aren't going to budge on this situation any time soon...

MWong4644d ago (Edited 4644d ago )

^ good bit of info there Kleptic and it makes sense.

@ badz149 ... I copletely forgot about that, when they had that E3 conference and everybody was like WTF Sony.

I would assume anything the XBone can do the PS4 can do. Sadly anything the PS4 can do the XBone cannot do. I was planning on getting both consoles agin this generation, but M$ has truely shown me they don't give a damn about me as a consume.

If I don't have internet I should keep playing my 360, that right there shows me your head is so far up in the clouds you don't give a damn about me.

GREATNESS AWAITS!!!

dcbronco4644d ago

@Baka-akaB and your comment sounds like you know a lot. Maybe you have the ability to read a book and remember how some things work, but I have a feeling you lack vision or the ability to push technology forward. You're one of those let's stay in the cave, keep moving no food will grow from those seeds people.

@Kleptic

Well reasoned argument. But I think from the wording of some of the comments that MS has something different they are doing. And looking at Some of the patents they have filed. You seem like a smart guy so I'll throw this at you. They filed a Patent for a system where two GPUs wrote to the same scene. Would it be possible to have part of the game rendered and streamed from the cloud and then have the consoles GPU produce more urgent code handled itself and then added to the stream? Basically like a green screen effect. Kind of like a proximity rendering for the console and the cloud rendering for everything else. I also think they have made some new compression techniques. I believe the move engines and ESRAM might be more about the cloud and less about bandwidth. That is why I believe they are so determined to have it always connected.

Kleptic4643d ago

^thanks man

Well i should've first said, the company i work for does nothing with graphics rendering...but does do a lot with modeling. I'm a DB admin though, so i don't really know the ins and outs of the actual coding...just what boxes to put them in haha.

But, i have seen that patent listing, and that does relate to what MS used as an example with 'fog being rendered by the cloud'...On paper that does seem entirely possible...however, in my experience, having two lines of gpu related instructions that out of sync with each other (one would be nearly instant, the other would be WAY behind it, and there for need to be requested WAY before it...if that makes sense) will create a procedure for doing it that would be more work than necessary...on the developer side i mean.

So what i'm getting at, that from where i'm sitting, the cloud would only be able to do processing that was so simple, and so out of touch with anything real-time, that i just can't see how it would be any real benefit.

The fog thing for example. If a gpu in cloud was processing that, you immediately lose any dynamic nature it might have. It would have to be just a back drop with its own sets of physics and procedural wind or something, that could not be changed by any of your actions. Scripted situations like that are not taxing at all. Current gen consoles can already do many effects like this locally without much trouble (killzone 2 for example), so i just see it as a complex way of doing something that isn't all that resource heavy to begin with.

They also said the cloud could do 'lighting', which would impose the same problem. If the cloud is doing it, completely out of sync with the real time local rendering, you'd have to compromise the dynamic nature of it. It could only do a global lighting system that slowly changes through a written script, not lighting that has dynamic nature, like firing a weapon and the related muzzle flare, or explosions, etc...the cloud would have so much latency with that, they couldn't sync it with your actions...

but we'll see...i'm no expert...its just i find this heavily laced with marketing, more than concrete technology that is ready to be implemented...

dcbronco4643d ago

Thanks for answering Kleptic. I understand what you explained. I just have a feeling this is more than a marketing campaign. It's like many said streaming a movie wouldn't be possible. Then it was a HD movie at today's speeds. I believe they have something up their sleeves. But I respect your expertise. We'll all see in the coming months and years.

+ Show (19) more repliesLast reply 4643d ago
jmc88884645d ago

The cloud is vastly overrated.

But xbox has nothing to stand on, so they breathe some fumes, get delusional, and start talking about the cloud.

OC_MurphysLaw4645d ago

Overated? Is that why Sony is launching Gaikai sometime in 2014....a service 100% dependent on the cloud?

Hicken4645d ago

Gaikai is meant more for streaming content than computing, though I imagine it could be set to the task competently enough.

The difference is that MS is banking much of their system's future and potential on the supposed capability of the cloud to compensate for what their console lacks.

MRMagoo1234645d ago

I think jmc8888 should have phrased it , the way MS says cloud will work for games is BS not overrated.

first1NFANTRY4645d ago

All these features and the ps4 still manage to be cheaper than the xbone

TheFamous14645d ago

Probably would be the same price if Microsoft wasn't so dependent on including the Kinect.

4644d ago
BattleTorn4644d ago

Just putting this out there - anyone else wonder if the price point reflects the fact that a few most ago Sony had its' top 50 execs give up their bonuses?

DOOMZ4645d ago

Except their cloud is nowhere near the size of Xbox one's!

sonic9894645d ago

did you believe that 300,000 server marketing stunt
btw virtual servers are very common these days

JamieL4644d ago

@ sonic
Well if they're so common then why is that 300,000 number just a PR stunt and so hard to believe? Also $499.00 is "ridiculous", what was your view when the PS3's price was $599.00? I’m sure that was well worth the money right? Everyone likes to hate on only 1 company here. I hate to see such close minded people spreading bullshit like their opinion is law. We still need to see MS implement and prove its plan, but at least they have the BALL'S to try something new. All Sony is doing is perfecting their already existing formula(not that that’s bad), just doing the same thing better, but it’s still the same thing. Last gen Nintendo had the balls to try something new, and we see who won that. Sony is pretty much cloning what made the 360 successful. If you disagree with that then you are an average n4g user, but the friendly architecture, check, reaching out to indie developers, check, charging for MP, check. I am excited to see what Sony comes up with, and to be honest I feel the always online thing on the XBone will ensure the PS4 will dominate sales this gen no doubt, but MS, if they do it right, could change and move gaming forward. They could very well crash and burn, but they are bringing something all new to gaming without a doubt, It may be good, or it may be bad, but at least they aren’t stagnate. I just don’t wait to SEE what happens instead of hating so early in the game.

Kleptic4644d ago

'their cloud is nowhere near the size of Xbox one's!'???

the company i work for has a cloud processing network of over 5 million dedicated machines/servers...NOT ONE OF THEM connected to a residential ISP...These are work machines networked across the North East US, all connected through commercial broadband with a 1/4 of the latency compared to the average home broadband connection...

and as a company...we're no where near capable of real time rendering and interaction as a 'whole' to any degree...It would be an incredible system for making a pixar movie, as a complex rendering farm...but having all these networked machines talking back and forth at the speed you would need to have a real time environment, where requests are heard at the same speed as information pushing...all with total latency underneath roughly 100ms (which would still be bad from an input lag stand point)...its simply not possible...

Do you guys even understand what has to happen in a cloud processed situation? You have to send input from a controller to your console (which alone has roughly 50ms worth of latency, some games much worse)...it then has to leave your machine as a request, pass through your router with any of its firewalls, get to the ISP...queued into the environment as a request while the request server figures out where it wants to go...leave the ISP to yet another ISP which is handling the cloud processing system, be queued...again...finally hit the cloud processing system, the request is then carried out, pipe it back to the back end ISP, back to your ISP, downloaded to your machine through the same router and everything...get processed by your console, converted into video, shot through HDMI to your TV...and you finally see it in action...

remember...any latency over about 60'ish ms total...and you'll notice it as lag in which things on screen aren't happening in relation to your inputs...multiplayer games fix this with gimmicks to make it not as noticeable, as your toon isn't where you think it is in relation to other players...but there is no way to fake it when it comes to input lag...if it doesn't happen nearly immediately, its deemed unplayable...

thats keeping it as simple as possible...and even the most hopeless of tech-scared people could see how much of a nightmare that is...

I promise everyone...Sony's cloud thing will be for streaming and extremely simple gaming...MS's is a PR mess...that will have no effect on its 'future power' as a home gaming console...maybe next generation, but even then it won't happen until the infrastructure of residential network providers are rebuilt from the ground up...

koolaid2514645d ago

In order to use the cloud you must be connected to the internet all of the time thats the whole point of the cloud.

jmc88884645d ago

No, because only games that need the cloud require to be online when they want to use that game.

You think they need to use the cloud for the OS?

That's the point. Choosing to be online to play online is not the same as needing to be online to do anything.

Heartnet4645d ago

Just cause it can doenst mean it will.

nypifisel4645d ago

Well for us who knows about computers in general knew that all Microsoft said was PR bullshit. Like they had some magical secret - The clouds are just servers... Anyone could do that if they wished to invest in it. Cloud computing is not feasible today though seeing how the internet infrastructure of the world isn't up to par.

4644d ago
nypifisel4644d ago

Please... -_- Sony isn't pushing the cloud like MS does, cause it's not feasible. WHEN the time comes and the infrastructure is in place Sony could use the cloud for computing as well.. Jeez, read my OP before commenting, makes you look stupid. What Sony is doing in 2014 with the cloud (Streaming) is however more likely to work now (if you have a good enough connection)

christian hour4644d ago (Edited 4644d ago )

@gameonbro linking to renderman to prove your point just further shows your ignorance towards how these thigns work.

You obviously don't know the difference between using the cloud to boost rendering farms for lengthy CGI rendering hours and using cloud for rendering visuals plus instant user feedback on the spot. Cloud is only useful for one, guess which one it is. Stop being an idiot and do some actual god damn research.

Cloud will not do what Microsoft said it would do, not in this day and age, and especially not with the way internet distribution currently is globally.

The point of this article want "hey sony has cloud, now cloud is cool" it was "Hey people who think cloud is magic, its not, this is what it is, anyone can do it, ps3 does it already, it is nowhere near capable of doing what MS claims it will, not for at least another 10-15 years at the earliest, stop being a blind fan boy, HEY! LISTEN!" but of course if you had actually read the article, you would have realized that. But you didn't, and you also didn't read shit about renderman, or cloud computing, or anything for that matter, because if you did, you wouldn't say silly things like "no one knows what can or cant be done yet" because we do, we do know what can and cant be done because the technology is not new, in fact nothing in any of the nex gen consoles is new technology.

Also your comment about even pixar realizing you can do more on cloud than with one computer... If you even knew what render-farms were you'd smack yourself in the face for that sentence, of course they know that. Every animation company knows that. Thats why theyve been using render farms for over 20 years!

Sorry for the angry rant but your ignorance just hit a nerve I guess.

alb18994645d ago

Of curse they can do it, but not as Microsoft and 300,000 servers.

nypifisel4645d ago

Microsoft doesn't have 300.000 physical servers, they're with most certainty counting virtual servers. And why couldn't they do it like Microsoft? It's just servers - If I had the money I could buy 300.000 servers. Jeez.

alb18994645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

You just said it......if you have the money. You think business are going well for SONY or you are just a person that think that SONY means play station?
I never said that the servers were physical there but how can you be so sure that they aren't?

detroit2cali4644d ago

You must be retarded if you think Sony can't afford servers. You must think Sony means PlayStation because they are doing fine. Microsoft is known for being cheap, that is why people are calling BS on the physical servers. I really hope English isn't your first language because your sentences are terrible.

alb18994644d ago

I'm trying hard with the English!
SONY as a company is not doing well in any of his products but play station.
Sells in computers, tvs, MP3 players, dvd players, blueray players, phones are down.....SONY isn't what use to be.
So yes, I think SONY doesn't have the money power that Microsoft does......do you want to discus about that?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4644d ago
oof464645d ago

My absolute favorite line of the article:

"Both consoles can do cloud computing. Although be warned--it's all pretty much a load of rubbish either way. Hooray for marketing!"

MRMagoo1234645d ago

that sums up all the cloud computing BS MS are spinning, anyone that thinks the xbone will get any kind of extra power via the cloud are dreaming, its not gonna happen.

4644d ago
oof464644d ago

@gameonbro: I did not say I believe or don't believe in cloud computing. I said it was my favorite line of the article.

alittleshakey4645d ago

Has anyone bothered to ask Sony how many servers THEY have to back up that claim? That's what I thought. Just taking their word that "sure we can do that".

NeoTribe4645d ago

I can taste your tears.

tarbis4645d ago

You truly believe that M$ have 300k servers? I pity you.

rainslacker4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

Even assuming that MS has 300K physical servers, they won't all be dedicated to the X1. Azure provides hundreds of services to thousands of companies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Dedicating 300K physical cloud servers to the X1 would make the X1 the biggest money sink in gaming history, far surpassing the loss Sony took on the PS3.

There's some good info in that Wiki for those interested in how it works, and how it's deployed around the world.

Of particular note, and more on topic to my comment, note the amount of power that the dublin data center uses(witch MS claims to have 100K servers). Now figure out how much money it costs to run one of those things for a year, and my point should be clear as day. For comparison, the average home uses about 16,000 kWh(note the k) per year(you can do the conversion, I'm tired). Now imagine all the maintenance to hardware and professional staff that has to be employed at each one.

Of more particular note. Each data center uses between 1800-2500 servers. 300K physical servers means they would have 120 data centers globally if you take the top end 2500 per location. Now figure out how much that would cost to run...just for X1?...no way in hell.

Edit: Scroll to the bottom of the wiki...they provide some "significant outages" over the past year or so.

wellard4645d ago

Just like Microsoft im willing to bet that they dont have anywhere near 300,000 servers.

People who are trying to justify this MS cloud rubbish really need to sit down and read up on a few server related subjects. ie: Virtual servers and latency. So far all weve seen "the cloud" actually do is is race your profile against your friends profile while your offline. Now not to be petty but why would i give a flying fluke, i dont give a rats bottom about racing my profile while im offline. Its not going to give me any advantage in the game at all. Name 1. Yeah so they say you will earn rewards while your sleeping. Well so will everyone else, which means that in game prices will be adjusted to reflect this so theres no benefit at all. Its a gimmick.

If this cloud stuff worked and it could make the console 4 times more powerful dont you think ms would have released proof, especially considering all of the bad press they have been facing since the reveal?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4645d ago
wastedcells4645d ago

Sony has been all about the games but I think people will be super surprised and happy when they start to show what else they have planned. Especially when it comes to cloud services. There is a reason why they invested so much in this technology. Personally I think Sony has a lot more to announce and show. They have played this really smart. We will see a lot more games as well. We still have gamecon (the European E3) and the Tokyo game show coming before the PS4 launch.

Christopher4645d ago

A phone can do cloud gaming....

showtimefolks4645d ago

its just funny hearing from MS that its Marathon not a race well sony has been saying that for almost 2 decades now lol

now matter how MS or its fanbse spin this fact is ps4 will sell very well and xbox one will struggle, xbox one will do fine in the states IMO but world wide its gonna be a big struggle

JamieL4643d ago (Edited 4643d ago )

So, if that's the one thing they copy good. I think it's funny that people like you are praising the PS4 to no end (which, for the record, I think is praise worthy) after a whole gen of bashing the 360. You know all Sony is doing is cloning what made the 360 a success. I know no one on here will look at it objectively otherwise they would see this. Again I say friendly architecture, check, reaching out to indie developers, check, charging for MP, check. You all bashed the 360 to no end, now can’t keep your tongues in your mouths when Sony does the SAME THING. Now MS has the BALLS to try to bring a new concept to gaming and it’s right back on the hate wagon. LOL now MS does have a lot to proove, and I’m not saying the XBone will catch on, or even be good, but one thing you can bet on is if it is successful Sony will copy it, then it will get some N4G love. I’m excited to see how they implement the new capability’s.

miDnIghtEr20C_SfF4645d ago

But that means you need to be online to take advantage of the PS4 cloud. LoL.. which then means needing to be always online to take advantage of it.

Ya, some people will say I won't use that.

That's not the point though. If you want to use the cloud and what it offers, YOU NEED TO BE ONLINE. It's so amusing.

dennett3164645d ago

Yes, and consumers who don't want to connect - or can't - have the option of ignoring the games that use the cloud on PS4.
With Xbox One, there is NO option, you HAVE to be online at least once every 24 hours. See the difference yet?
Personally, I hope no game ever has cloud functions as standard, because the second your internet connection drops, your game is screwed. Funny how this so-called "future" that MS seem to be rushing towards has so many more points of failure that will hurt the end user in the long run...almost like they don't give a damn about their customers so long as they are able to force control upon them.

Cinuous4645d ago

yea you'll need to be online to use cloud, but for people with no internet connection there's offline gaming, what dont you get about that?? your so quick to try and prove a point but fail to understand where people are coming from about being able to play there console if they dont have an internet connection, online isnt a requirement for the ps4. your complete lack of understanding....its so amusing.

Malice-Flare4645d ago

Folding@home says hi...

Demon's/Dark Souls also say hello...

Kaneda4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

Can PS4 does 4D like PS3 did? and 1080p 120 fps like PS3.. That was some of the marketing points when PS3 was launched... :)

SatanSki4645d ago

"Linking, matchmaking... there are already many computations being done on the cloud side,"

Yoshida was mumbling again like he didnt know what kind of cloud computing he was asked about. This guy is annoying me more and more

Fishermenofwar4644d ago

"You're deceptive" Ralph Wiggum voice

BallsEye4644d ago

My phone could do cloud computing, also my handwatch and a tv coz all it needs is internet connection to do so BUT IT WILL NEVER BE DOING CLOUD COMPUTING. Why? Because it requires a huge server power, amazing software and to be designed for it from scratch to be able to fully use it. Eventho PS4 is a preffered system it will not have cloud abilities like XBOX ONE do and you are a sheep if you get fooled so easily by few well written words.

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 4643d ago
FrigidDARKNESS4645d ago

They are talking about cloud computing but really not pushing it like MS.

Enemy4645d ago

Lol they'll push it when they need to. Sony already has the most powerful console ever created. It's the last thing they care about right now.

Skips4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

Pretty much. 50% MORE RAW POWER.

7GB of much faster and efficient RAM used for games compared to only 5GB of slower and less efficient RAM for games.

Not only that.

But stack the MAJOR power gap on top of Sony's 1st party devs such as SSM and Naughty Dog who push each game to the max and probably have more talent than most of Microsoft's 1st party combined.

TOTAL. ANNIHILATION.

jmc88884645d ago

Actually it could be higher.

Remember folks 1.8 vs 1.2 is 50 percent greater.

If they downclock it....

1.8 vs 0.8 = 125 percent more raw power.

So depending on what they actually release...and remember time is now a factor as well, the PS4 it seems will be between 50 and 125 percent more powerful.

imt5584645d ago

@jmc

Yes, they did downclock the GPU. You know why? Because they play XO games on PC at E3. They didn't have XO ready for E3.

a_bro4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

they paid $400 million for Gaikai for a reason, and it wasnt only for just streaming.

at the end of the day, this cloud computing stuff is just is all BS..

Enemy4645d ago

We've seen a couple developers call out Microsoft on it already. I can't help but crack up whenever I see them bring up "cloud computing" because they don't even know what it really means, lol.

Heartnet4645d ago

Cloud is basically the future tbh... Shifting some of the games reliance on the system to servers and allowing the developers to update things in real time is just crazy and a whole new experience..

Sony is still stuck in the past and they need to focus on more than just streaming games via gaikai cause as with OnLive that will fail...

a_bro4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

As I said, there's a reason why they paid $400 million for gaikai alone, and it isn't just to stream games, it goes far beyond that.

That's why multiplayer is behind a paywall.

PS-Analog4645d ago

@ Heartnet
Streaming games has one huge benefit, play a demo of a game without a huge download. Play a demo in seconds not hours.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4645d ago
Qrphe4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

"but really not pushing it like MS"

Thank god

Blackdeath_6634645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

what has MS pushed they talk about all this cloud computing nonsense but didn't give a single example of it. sony atleast has gaikai and clearly stated what it will be used for i.e you can stream your games via the cloud. the only example they showed was drivatar in forza 5 but that is nothing new the idea of having a ghost AI that replicates your movements has existed for a long time tekken on psp had a system where you can record your movements and upload your ghost so that it can fight against other people you were also able to share and download and fight against other peoples ghosts. that game did not require the cloud there are whole forums set up to share other people's ghosts so to me drivatar is nothing new almost a complete rip-off

SniperControl4645d ago

Driveatar! That cracks me up. Lol. Driveatar........

DEEBO4645d ago

lol dude the man knows what he's talking about.how hard is it to understand that MS put all their chips with kinect,sony went with a more powerful system.just enjoy what the xbox has to offer for you.if you want the stronger system go with the ps4,it's that simple.if theres some xbox1 games you want to play,buy the xbox.

rageus4645d ago

I don't think you're allowed to be reasonable or rational on the internet.

jmc88884645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

What's reasonable about forgetting about the DRM and spying?

I'd say forgetting about that is unreasonable and irrational.

Acting like they don't matter, don't exist, or won't affect you is entirely incorrect and doesn't shield you.

Xbox One is going to be a big hacker target. People do have spotty or no internet access. People do have data caps. Kinect 2 will exploit you, just will it be big or small. Bombarding you with ads or making your insurance cost more, ratting you out to school/employment, etc.

And if the gov't wants it, they'll get it, and share it with everyone. Audio/video too.

Anyone that ignores that is by definition not being rational or reasonable.

BallsEye4644d ago

@DEEBO

Spying?

I bet you got that facebook account with all your info and your relatives info...timeline of your whole damn life and twitter account to let everyone know when you make a sandwich.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4644d ago
Belking4645d ago

If they can ever get it working...lol

HammadTheBeast4645d ago

Well, Gaikai has proven itself much more than "300 k servers".

Drekken4645d ago

Yeah, they paid all that money for a service that doesn't work.

The extended time is to get a huge library from psx, ps2, and ps3 games. Plus it needs to be fully integrated into the Sony servers.

Qrphe4645d ago

Gaikai holds the Guiness World Record for fastest streaming gaming service. I'd say MS really has taken up a challenge lol

Machiavellian4645d ago

MS Azure platform runs whole companies, Its Pixar rendering farm for those great looking movies you enjoy. I believe Sony has a long way to go before they are even considered in the space where MS is at. MS cloud platform competes with Amazon and Google, Sony isn't even considered a player.

Stream a game like a movie is no different then Netflix streaming a movie.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4645d ago
TheFallenAngel4645d ago

I thought this was said since they announced it? Sony just doesn't say it for 30 minutes. Xbone is going to be in trouble.

Belking4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

Sony doesn't have any cloud computing built into their console and Gaikai isn't cloud computing. It's just a cloud based streaming service. MS Azure is something totally different built from the ground up. No dev has come out and said anything about PS4 titles utilizing cloud computing. Sony isn't a technology company. That the reason why they had to buy gaikai because they know it would take them many years to build their own streaming service.

AznGaara4645d ago

You're still streaming something to your console its still the same concept. Why can't you wrap our head around that? It's actually more impressive to be able to stream full games to the console than it is to stream bits of AI or physics. Also "Sony isnt technology company" please... stop... please.

Belking4645d ago

"It's actually more impressive to be able to stream full games to the console than it is to stream bits of AI or physics"

Sorry buddy, but you're wrong on that one. Streaming a game is similar to streaming a movie in which is already done by Netfix, smart tv and others. Cloud computing is not the same. And no sony isn't a technology company. They are entertainment/electronics company. if they are technology then explain why they had to buy Gaikai to provide streaming? It's because that is not their area.

Heartnet4645d ago

It may look more impressive but the results from what ive seen are less than satisfactory... unless ur runnning a lag free high speed internet connection with alot of bandwidth it offers no advantages.

However cloud computing offers alot more choice and ease of use for teh develoepr and by the sounds of it opens alot more oppurtunites for a more immperssive experience

one2thr4645d ago

@Belking

Dude Sony is to Hardware, as Microsoft is to Software...

Dont be one of those folks that say "Microsoft makes/manufacture computers", or "Made the first computer"...

When they're not, they make the Software (Windows) that does onto the hardware (computers) Dell,Hp,toshiba, etc =/= Microsoft...

Sony makes laptops, with Windows on them... Do you get the picture?

4me24645d ago

There is a huge difference between streaming a movie and a game. I hope you know that a movie is passive form entertainment, it doesn't change its context because you pressed pause, stop, ff..... once you go to your favorite part it is the same as it was yesterday, is now and will be tomorrow.
That's why you can buffer it.

Games, on other hand, have randomness to itself (even co called linear one), they depend on your input to generate output frame which is different each time you play. I think this why we play them and called them games, not movies. So does running a game in Gaikai/cloud require computation power?????

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4645d ago
FrigidDARKNESS4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

Thank God this guy is telling the truth. Sony would have a massive task building up a cloud infrastructure. This may not be in Sony's budget. Microsoft & Samsung collaborated to build the worlds fastest and most efficient cloud server.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

MysticStrummer4645d ago

"Sony doesn't have any cloud computing built into their console"

Neither does Microsoft. You're falling for marketing.

Belking4645d ago

"You're falling for marketing."

yea, kinda like those Toy Story graphics sony said we would get with the PS2...lol

Rainstorm814645d ago

@belking

Soooooo you're saying you know its marketing and you are still going to fall for it??

http://www.threadbombing.co...

adorie4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

Ignorance can be corrected through teaching, learning, but yours must be ignored for the earlier won't help you come to terms.

Microsoft isn't a software company.

Do you find something wrong with this sentence?

ginsunuva4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

If it has internet connection it can take computations from online.

How do you think websites work? Calculations are done on the server and the result sent to your computer.

The whole "cloud" word has been used recently to fool dumb people into thinking there's something new. Cloud = on a remote computer through the internet.

Heartnet4645d ago

Congratz. But still this is the first time being done on a home console. And its starting to offer more than just calculations lol

Sarobi4645d ago

"cloud computing built into their console"

This alone shows you have no idea how any of this stuff actually works.

Heartnet4645d ago

I know what your saying lol but what i think he means is that Gaikai is just another app whereas Cloud computing is built into everything MS does

MysticStrummer4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

"yea, kinda like those Toy Story graphics sony said we would get with the PS2...lol"

Except Sony never said that. Microsoft did.

Try again, little fella.

Belking4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

Yes they did. Xbox wasn't even announced when they said that so nice try.....lol I don't blame you for denying it though. It was such rubbish crap....lol

SITH4645d ago

Actually sony said, "toy story." http://money.cnn.com/1999/0...

Microsoft said, "toy story 2."
http://www.wired.com/scienc...

MysticStrummer4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

@SITH - Read the CNN article you linked. That's not a quote from Sony.

@Belking - What difference does it make when it was said? Microsoft directly claimed to be delivering Toy Story graphics. Sony did not.

Google it. Sony said PS2 would deliver graphics comparable to "movie-quality 3D graphics in real time."

They never said Toy Story. Microsoft did, for 360 graphics.

MysticStrummer4645d ago

You're holding onto a myth with that PS2 Toy Story thing, so it's not surprising you'd hold onto the idea of the cloud.

Sony said this :

"The quality of the resulting screen image is comparable to
movie-quality 3D graphics in real time."

and journalists turned that into "Toy Story" and even "Jurassic Park".

KentBlake4645d ago

No, they're probably a grocery store.

Come on, stop with the nonsense.

grimmweisse4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

Please explain to everyone here what cloud computing hardware is? Because its seems that you are clutching at straws at the moment making statements without backing anything up.

There is no magical hardware for it. The PS4, Xbox One and PC ( yes there are more powerful pcs compared to next gen consoles, before pc elitists rage)are running similar hardware and architecture. So whatever platform you thinking about, cloud based services can be utilitiezed but it doesn't mean they will use them.

And yes, gaikai is cloud computing, It's cloud streaming, you know computations done server side on cloud servers to stream the game data back to the user, tell me if I am wrong.

The same like cloud hosting services like Dropbox where you can host files on cloud servers. Just because MS built a super cloud service with Azure, doesn't mean all other cloud based services are not cloud services. Because it is what you're saying.

And the devs working on the PS4 probably don't need to utilise some cloud service for making their games because I reckon the hardware Sony provided is sufficient enough. If developers were clamouring for such services then it would of been implemented.

grimmweisse4645d ago

Are you backwards or something?

Sony has always been a technology company you tit! Just because they didn't produce their own cloud service doesn't mean they are not a technology company. For christ sakes they produce TVs, PCs&notebooks, mobiles&tablets, sound&audio, gaming, etc... products. What are those....tech products.

The Gaikai accusation was an investment and major companies do it. But I don't think you really know how such things work judging for your lack of reasoning. Samsung, arguably the biggest technological company in the world, INVESTED in Sharp to produce the new Igzo displays for their upcoming products. Does that make now make Samsung a non- technological entity!

But keep spouting your nonsense it provides the comment thread with some humour.

BallsEye4644d ago

90% of people here on N4G have NO IDEA what they are talking about. Gaikai is nothing like Azure. Biggest companies IN THE WORLD use azure for their cloud computing (hello pixar). It's like comparing an old nokia to a smartphone - HEY IT CAN MAKE CALLS SO IT's THE SAME! You guys go learn a little before you cheer to every sony pr stunt.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4644d ago
Show all comments (197)
90°

PS5 Sales Pass 92.2 Million Units, Beating Nintendo Switch 2 in the Holiday Quarter

Sony announced its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2025, alongside the traditional update on PS5 shipments.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
29d ago Replies(5)
italiangamer28d ago

Sony and Nintendo are both thriving and I'm happy, thank goodness for them or otherwise the whole gaming industry would be in shambles if they only had PC to rely on!

dveio28d ago

• Total G&NS revenue: 10.5 billion USD
• Operating profit: 900 million USD
• Hardware sales: 8M units shipped
• Software sales: 97M units
• PSN MAU: 132M

vs. Xbox:

• Total gaming revenue: 5.96 billion USD
• nothing else gets reported

__y2jb28d ago

Xbox operating costs are without a doubt eye wateringly high, way way way higher than Sony. GP is costing them an absolute fortune to operate.

Tapani28d ago

That is a very solid operating profit. It's not net, obviously, but still a very healthy amount of cash you make after cost of debt and taxes (+ other expenses), and can invest into R&D and future endeavours. And give back to your shareholders or buy back shares.

DivineHand12528d ago

It would be in Sony's beat interest to not rush next generation. Let 2029 or 2030 be the start of next generation. There is clearly plenty of demand for the PS5 and gamers are not asking for more at this time.

S2Killinit28d ago

Yup especially with the price of tech going up. They already have the PRO to hold them over.

__y2jb28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Exactly this. Let Xbox wither on the vine for a couple more years and there will be nothing left.

fr0sty28d ago

I fully agree for 2 reasons:

1. Microsoft seems to be in a hurry to release the new Xbox, if they do at all... AMD speculates a 2027 release. This will hurt them in the long run, because:

2. Datacenters are buying up ALL the RAM, and some RAM manufacturers have stopped making RAM for consumer products entirely, while the other remaining ones are scared to ramp up their production capacity to make more RAM because they're worried this whole AI thing is a bubble that is about to pop, and they don't want to be caught holding the bag when it does pop. So, for now, it costs $300-400 for 32GB of DDR5. That's the MSRP for some entire consoles.

If Microsoft drops the new Xbox now, it's going to cost them a fortune. If Sony holds their cards a moment and lets PS5 cook for a while, as it's showing no signs whatsoever of slowing down in sales, then by the time PS6 is ready to drop, RAM prices should have stabilized, allowing Sony to devote much more of their budget towards making PS6's CPU and GPU more powerful, in addition to the tech itself maturing and the available CPU and GPU parts being much more powerful for the same price point than they would be if released today. So, we'd get a super powerful PS6 in say, 2029, that won't have to cost $700-800. They speculate, based on the current specs, that the new Xbox will cost north of $1,000, and that was before the RAM shortage came into the picture. It's definitely going to be even higher now that RAM costs so much.

MS will be shooting themselves in the foot (again) if they try to drop a new Xbox now, and Sony would be wise to capitalize on that mistake by holding their cards a while longer, raking in more of those PS5 profits, and then dropping a new console as soon as the hardware market stabilizes from this AI datacenter BS.

darthv7228d ago

7 years is a hurry...? Its the same amount of time between XBO and series. The same amount of time between PS3 to PS4 and PS4 to PS5. The 360 was 8 years between it and XBO.

If they do release first, and then Sony a year or two later... is it not possible for prices to come down in that time?

repsahj28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

I think Switch 2 beat PS5 during December 2025 that is why the gap decrease to 1m units. Because during black friday, I know PS5 sales is 2:1 against the Switch 2.

And I just want to add that the PlayStation 5 is currently 1.94 million units BEHIND the PlayStation 4 when you align launches. While Switch 2 is 10M ahead against the Switch 1 when you aligned covering it's first 7 months.

S2Killinit28d ago

I think you are forgetting to mention the chip shortages for PS5.

salis84428d ago (Edited 28d ago )

No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly.

PS5 being less than 2m behind PS4 is not a big deal; PS5 had to deal with COVID and ongoing supply and pricing struggles that clearly still exist today. Sales of software are incredibly strong, and the size of the community is bigger than its ever been.

PS5 is well on pace to exceed its early (2021) estimates of 110m by end of life even if that's 2027. PS5 will hit 100m before November and then sell another 6-8M in November + December.

PS5 is doing great, and so is Switch 2, it's good for everyone that they succeed, pitting the two against each other is more damaging than anything related to the sales of the two consoles individually.

repsahj28d ago

"No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly."

majority on this site tells otherwise.

Dexterio28d ago

@repsahj
Yup because they’ve been the anti consumer they are for so long and needs to be humbled 😆

CrashMania28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

I'd be lying if I said I didn't regret my purchase a bit. I mainly bought it for Mario Kart World, but I find it pales in comparison to 8. I'm annoyed that Nintendo charged money for a super barebones 'upgrade' to Jamboree, no new minigames? No new boards? Just some gimmicky low res camera mode. Oh and Midtroid Prime 4 let me down as well, yet to go back and finish it.

I don't want the Switch 2 to fail, it's contributing to a healthier console market with the death of xbox consoles. I'll get use out of mine long term, but some of Nintendo's decisions like the ones above just annoy me lol.

jznrpg28d ago

@respahj the only thing I want Nintendo to badly is the 80$ games so they lower the price.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
Show all comments (37)
50°

Sony Patents AI-Generated Podcasts Using PlayStation Character Voices

A new patent registered by Sony suggests the company is exploring the idea of personalized podcasts on PS5, hosted by PlayStation characters.

Eonjay29d ago

Okay this is actually really cool too. What is being proposed here is that the AI will generate you a podcast that is focused on the games tht you play or have wihlisted. This means you always get topic relevant to your tastes. Just don't screw it up with a bunch of ads.

PapaBop28d ago

AI is very cool, it's just all the real cool stuff is being drowned out by companies exploiting it as a marketing buzzword, generative AI slop and companies using it to cut corners and save money.

Sciurus_vulgaris29d ago

This is a terrible idea. Firstly the characters voices originate from real voice work. Secondly, the ai could end up saying questionable things. Thirdly, some voice actors use their regular voice when acting.

Juancho5129d ago

I know it's cool to hate AI, but we only hate AI because of idiots that misuse it or exploit it to take away peoples jobs. THIS is a GREAT application of AI, instead of having a human being voice actor sitting there for hours talking in character while having people writing scripts or coming up with topics etc, it can all just get POOFd into thin air and you can enjoy unique and entertaining content that harms no one.

PapaBop28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Not sure if intentionally being funny lol. isn't this like quite literally taking away people's jobs? I think SAG-AFTRA may disagree about this harming no one.,

Juancho5125d ago

The thing is that this isn't even something that's necessary to create as a job. Without AI it just wouldn't exist period, it wouldn't be worth the effort. So what I mean to say is, having AI utilize the voice actors (with their consent of course) to create unlimited "podcast-style" content is not only super lucrative (which people will call exploitation), but it creates an entire form of entertainment that requires a "Set it and forget it" mechanism where you don't have to babysit it or hire and fire or train or anything.

TLDR: Without AI this wouldn't even be considered at all, so I'd rather have this than not have it at all.

gold_drake28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

i hate this

i hate all of this. dont just use peoples voices for AI slob that u dont pay for

Show all comments (11)
80°

RAM Price Increases Could See Next-Generation Console Releases Delayed

Insider Gaming has learned that the ongoing price increases in RAM due to the rise in AI could delay the next generation of console releases.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
66d ago
slate9166d ago

What is even the incentive of upgrading to the next-gen after this console generation we've had? Graphics are plateauing, prices at an all time high, studios skipping entire generations or simply releasing just one game for it...
Its a mess

Jin_Sakai65d ago

Been gaming all my life. This is the worst generation ever.

jznrpg65d ago

How do you gauge each generation? There has been a lot of really good games this gen. I only care about the games. First party hasn’t been the best but the generation isn’t over yet

DarXyde65d ago (Edited 65d ago )

jznrpg,

Thing is, every generation before this one has had something that defined console identity. Very little beyond bigger/more detailed games and performance modes are really there.

I feel the last generation that cared very much was gen 7; Capcom's darkest era, but I have to give them props for being really experimental at the time. We saw plenty of new games that still tried to do something new. Outside of Metaphor and Clair Obscur, this gen has been pretty forgettable if you ask me. I'm sure a lot of it is the corporatization of the industry and the creative talent has to keep making sequels and spiritual successors because the cost of development is out of control. But even then, plenty of these experiences are experiences we've had already. And the thing is. Switch 2 and PSVR2 could really be doing incredible things, but it's just not there. Xbox I just don't see the value or point anymore but that's just me.

anast65d ago

Why has is been the worst? I've been gaming all my life and this gen. has been one of the best.

Vits65d ago

Not to mention that just like this generation, the next one will also be shared between the current and next gen console at least for a couple of years. So the few titles that it will had, just like this one, will run on the console you already have.

franwex65d ago

We will be getting games on PS4, PS5, and PS6, haha.

Extermin8or3_64d ago

I think people have to remember the pandemic at start of this gen and how it effected game development. This next gen we will see the PS4 etc support dropped and truly see the full utilisation of SSD's improvements to ray and path tracing and the impact of AI upscaling etc will be where the biggest improvements will come from.

isarai_lee64d ago

My sentiments exactly, next gen has got to prove it's worth before i buy into it this time. This has been the weakest generation in my 30yrs of gaming. From the drawn out cross gen garbage, to so many games getting stuck in development hell or canceled, to the ABSURD levels of trend chasing to the point of self destruction, this gen just wasn't worth it

thorstein64d ago

I'm pretty sure I've already read a story that said Playstation is only halfway through this console's generation and that PS6 is a way off.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 64d ago
darthv7265d ago

Im good with next gen being pushed back to 27/28. It feels like this gen has only just begun.

Melankolis65d ago

Covid-19 held back everything at least 2 years worth. Although many people disliked, i think only UE5 can generally distinguish this gen from the previous one.

DarXyde64d ago

UE5 is definitely impressive, but I would also give the nod to the current version of Decima, at least the way it looks for Death Stranding 2.

CornholioX65d ago

That's normal how you think. Time goes faster when you're older and i bought my PS5 since day 1 release and now it's 5 years old. I don't mind a year delay to release PS6 in holiday 2028.

DoubleYourDose65d ago

Tomorrow isn't promised to any of us.

Eonjay64d ago

I was under the impression that next gen wasn't coming till 2027.z u9gsq

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 64d ago
victorMaje65d ago

Regardless of RAM price increases, I strongly believe there’s still a lot of potential left for the current gen. I’d be fine with at least 3 more years.

jznrpg65d ago

Whenever it comes out is fine with me. I still have backlog for the next year at least

Show all comments (38)