All Channels
Popular
110°

Culture: Xbox One Features Create Privacy Concerns

The company revealed that its upcoming Xbox One gaming console will be "always on," a startling feature in the wake of revelations about the National Security Agency's efforts to collect American citizens' phone and e-mail records.

Read Full Story >>
rollingstone.com
komp4723d ago (Edited 4723d ago )

Privacy indeed.

A bit like having to allow microsoft.com in the firefox plugin noscript before being able to post comments on n4g

Why is that?

JokesOnYou4722d ago (Edited 4722d ago )

BS...scare tactics.
"Xbox One Privacy Concerns Debunked"
"You can pause Kinect if you don’t want it on while playing games or enjoying entertainment. (Just say “Xbox Off.”) When the Xbox One is off, it’s only listening for the single voice command “Xbox On,” that’s it. And you can even turn that feature off too. Obviously, you’d need to enable Kinect for those apps or games that require Kinect functionality to operate."
http://winsupersite.com/xbo...
http://kotaku.com/xbox-one-...
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

Godmars2904722d ago

And yet while Kinect isn't required it must always be connected. Has to be "looking" at you while you use the console.

They've also been talking about using it a marketing tool since they've been talking about it.

MAJ0R4722d ago

Wait, the Xbox One won't work if it isn't connected to the Kinect?

If that's the case then I don't know what to say.

S2Killinit4722d ago

so basically even if we take what MS says at face value, then you still have the issue of the kinect collecting data from from while your system is on. If consumers allow this type of infringement into our homes, then there will be a day when all your appliances will collect data from you. Can you imagine? Forget the possibilities here in the US, think about what kind of horror is achievable by unrepresentative governments in population control if this reality comes true.

dale_denton4722d ago

you did all that work getting links for nothing.. jokes on....YOU. SERVED.

MasterCornholio4722d ago (Edited 4722d ago )

If the Kinect is only used to turn on the console via voice commands why can't they allow you to turn it on with the controller or a physical power button on the device? That way Kinect becomes unnecessary for turning it on allowing you to unplug the device which is a lot more secure than Just turning it off.

Motorola RAZR i

rainslacker4721d ago

Ya know...Before all this stuff got confirmed, I was one of those people who said blocking used games and requiring a internet connection was a terrible idea, and then said I don't believe MS would do it because it would be really stupid of them to try. I defended MS when the rumors were there and said that they are rumors, that we should wait for confirmation, that people were making a big deal out of nothing.

Well, lo and behold...They were really that stupid and are not only considering these restrictions, but actually implemented them in their system.

Now with this required Kinect thing, I really want to say, "Yeah, I doubt MS will use it for anything nefarious, it probably is exactly what they say", but realistically nothing MS does would surprise me right now. MS could easily come out and say, "Yeah it will listen and document everything you say/do to upload to our servers for 'research' data", all in the guise that it's beneficial to the consumer...like targeted advertising...OH wait, they already said they were going to do that at the freakin reveal. They made a big deal about it even.

What more proof do you need? Sure it's not "evil" like spying, but MS obviously has other intentions for this device to be used besides enhancing the user experience. One probably hundreds of times more profitable than the game segment...and that's consumer data collection.

The only thing that could truly surprise me right now is if MS came out and said that they designed their console to kill kittens...or came out and say they reversed their current polices. Personally I would bet that their machine would kill kittens before they reverse their policies.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4721d ago
hakesterman4722d ago

I can hear myself saying " Xboxone who has watched me in the last 24 HRS.

Response:

Joe Stiff
john Wankme
Don HardWood
Steve Booner
Jack Offman
Dick Harryballs
Sid JizzFreak

Skynetone4722d ago (Edited 4722d ago )

you forgot bill waits / bill wates

Anita Dump
Ben R. Over
Daisy May Blow
Dixie Normous
Fonda Cox
Harry Ballsack
Wang Phat

Show all comments (14)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot21d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle21d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7721d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk7725d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
26d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster300026d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv7226d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit25d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

26d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania26d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit25d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot0725d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr26d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box26d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr26d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire9526d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv7226d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--26d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv7225d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket26d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm26d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde26d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster9225d ago (Edited 25d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 25d ago
maximusprime_26d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

26d ago
BeHunted26d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

26d ago
CrashMania26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit25d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster9225d ago (Edited 25d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

25d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 25d ago
shadowT26d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers26d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz14926d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot0725d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)