I understand why people won't be paying for it, personally it doesn't bother me all that much because the games they give away each month more than make up for the cost anyway.

hey mate that's fine and im not one to tell anyone how to game or what to spend their money on. it's your money not mine ;)

but i don't play consoles online, maybe twice since launch with my PS3 so it's not something i would pay for.

it's a personal thing for me, ive lived with a VOIP program on my PC for so long, along with keyboard and mouse since Wolf3D, so a controller for FPS/TPS games is a step back for how i like to play those types of games.

game on mate, cheers.

im in the same boat i been a sony supporter 4 the longest and i think im going to sit this gen out. and i even have PS+ but im not going to support this on principle ill stick with my ps3 and vita... wait lost it imma buy a new tho and get another yr of PS+ when it run out i vote wit my wallet instead of taking it in the...

Perhaps, but at least you don't need PS+ to watch Netflix or Youtube, and at least online Free 2 Play games like Planetside 2, DC Universe Online and Dust 514, won't require PS+ either.

These are key differences between LIVE and PS+. Not to mention that PS+ gives gamers free games and other items, unlike LIVE where Microsoft is giving away two games per month, but only until the release of XBOX One. I don't think there's any way whatsoever to defend Microsoft's policies, but fanboys will always find a way.

Star Citizen looks pretty great, and Rome 2 ought to be a time eater, that's for sure. EVE-VR on Occulus Rift looks like it might be something special too. Plus, Firefall! There's too many, man.

yea they do and i want them but i cant accept this they could off easily strip down and give you only multiplayer no Gaikai, no free games, video recording and streaming, etc. im not seeing the point.