All Channels
Popular
210°

Kinect is the Best Console Peripheral Ever: Ironically

BigBoxGaming- "Ironic because of what it has come to represent; gimmicky, casual games, forced agendas…at least for now.

In a different light Kinect has a lot of potential. From a technology standpoint, the demos coming out for Kinect with the Xbox One are pretty amazing. You would think it wouldn’t take developers much time to find ways to incorporate those features into their games by introducing new mechanics. Unfortunately, for Kinect and Microsoft, that hasn’t really happend yet. When looking at the current generation and Kinect 1.0, the peripheral never found a home with core games. The easy applications have been in group gameplay setting with more “party” centered titles.  This, in addition to the low number of people that could play last gen, helped create the current reputation Kinect is enjoying."

Read Full Story >>
bigboxgaming.com
caleb47794721d ago

Just imagine what Nintendo would have done with Kinect.

I doubt we would be having this problem right now.

Godmars2904721d ago

They did and it was called the Wiimote.

It didn't work out to well. For anyone in the industry.

happyguy2714721d ago

Yes, because we all know how much the Wii struggled.

Microsoft is trying to please everyone and is alienating their fans in the process. Nintendo has never had that problem.

Kinect should stick with what it is good at, and that isn't hard core games.

Urusernamesucks4721d ago

Did not work too well?

that shit sold 100 millions!
Mario kart on the wii was fun, and so was wii sports.

aCasualGamer4721d ago

@Godmars290

Apart from all the great games from first party studios at Sony and some really great third party games, the highlight of this generation was Nintendo Wii and the awesome experience it brought.

You can never take that away from Nintendo, they nailed it with Wii. Wii U is a completely different story, but you can't take shit from Nintendo in terms of Wii.

When i saw how happy my mother got and how much joy she experienced when playing Wii sports against my siblings, i thought to myself, "thanks Nintendo".

Sure, it didn't have HD and the processing power was too weak for those really great AAA titles. But nevertheless Nintendo nailed it with Wii.

4721d ago
zebramocha4721d ago

@godmar the wii was successful but the tech didn't work like people thought.

morganfell4721d ago

"Yes, because we all know how much the Wii struggled."

It did struggle because games > sales. One would think with all the money they raked in they would have done a better job of depth in the games roster.

You can't play a sales receipt.

In terms of titles of quality the console finished dead last.

For me personally, the best peripheral has been the new PS Headset followed closely by the Sharpshooter - once you nail it you are lethal in KZ3.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4721d ago
CommonSenseGamer4721d ago (Edited 4721d ago )

Yeah, cause the CIA have nothing better to do than watch people play games. Honestly, CIA can learn more about you from what you freely post online through a multitude or websites anyway.

They should call all CIA-Book and not Facebook.

NameRemoved00174721d ago

No they would be looking for kids doing drugs mainly.

ShwankyShpanky4721d ago (Edited 4721d ago )

I always love the argument that "the CIA/government has better things to do than watch you." And hey... you're right... the people have better things to do... like study the reports that are spit out by the supercomputers that process and analyze just about every single piece of sigint/comint in the country (and much of the world). [edit: sigint: signals intelligence, comint: communications intelligence]

I can sometimes understand when the general public doesn't have any real concept of what computers can do nowadays, but I would hope gamers would be a little more informed.

>>Honestly, CIA can learn more about you from what you freely post online through a multitude or websites anyway.

>>They should call all CIA-Book and not Facebook.

That I can agree with.

omi25p4721d ago

Hdshatter.

If you truly believe that the CIA spend millions of hours and millions of dollars watching every single user in the world to see if they are doing drugs, then you are a fool.

ShwankyShpanky4718d ago (Edited 4718d ago )

@omi25p:

If you truly believe that the government does not use keyword software that can analyze every communication and isolate selected exerpts based on a preselected criteria, then you are a fool.

And while many people seem to like to default to this "they can't watch everyone" position (and yeah, they sort of can and do), there's the others that prefer to go for the "I'm/you're insignificant and one cares what you're doing" angle on the issue, which fails to address the issue of targeted monitoring. So many stupid comments from people about "I don't care if MS watches me play Halo in my boxers." What if you were involved in legal action against MS or one of their partners/subsidiaries (or just some other billionaire CEO buddy of Bill Gates)? Don't think that an audio/video stream into your house might be of interest to MS? Or maybe someone's an activist against a government position on one issue or another... you don't think that audio/video feed into their living room might be of interest to the government?

"All I do is sit on my ass all day playing CoD in my underwear... so why should anyone else care about a monitoring device in their home?"

Just because what *you* do in your livingroom may be insignificant, the same does not apply to everyone.

Then there's always the potential issues related to hackers or unscrupulous, voyeuristic employees of any of the companies involved in the Xbone data stream.

So fucking naive. So fucking myopic. So fucking childish.

(and let's not fool around with idiocy about "if you're worried, just unplug it." That such a precaution should need to be taken with your *video game console* is god damn ridiculous)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4718d ago
gabescow4721d ago

Kinect tech is overkill for hardcore games, too much based on movement.

But it's perfect for the casual market.

Shadonic4721d ago

I agree though it can work it wouldn't be that fun unless its done in a good way.

4721d ago
rainslacker4721d ago

I swear it's like edonus has a Kinect-sense whenever someone talks negatively about the Kinect. He's like a superhero coming in to dispense his anti-venom against all the biased media which has clouded our minds with vitriolic libelous claims of the devices worth.

o-Sunny-o4721d ago

PERFECT ! After stealing Eye Toys idea...Sony should of sued.

UNGR4721d ago

It's completely different technology, your ignorance has been noted.

cooperdnizzle4721d ago

Talk about ignorance, It is almost 100% the same Tech. Your stupidity has been noted!

UNGR4721d ago

The tech inside the the device, and how it tracks is entirely different, clearly you're taking this out of context, folks. I never said the use was different, again, ignorance has been noted.
Just to point out how stupid Sunny's comment was I guess Nintendo should sue Sony over the Move? Or does it not matter because they have patents on the tech? Same goes for Microsoft because they also have patents on their technology. Same situation, don't act like a fanboy, just makes you look bad.

Show all comments (42)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot4d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle3d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk773d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk778d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
9d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster30009d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv729d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit8d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

9d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania9d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit8d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot078d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr9d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box9d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr8d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire959d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv729d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--8d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv728d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket8d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm8d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde8d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster928d ago (Edited 8d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 8d ago
maximusprime_9d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

9d ago
BeHunted9d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

9d ago
CrashMania9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit8d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster928d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

8d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 8d ago
shadowT9d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers9d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz1498d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot078d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)