340°

Additional Killzone Shadow Fall "B-roll" Footage

Sony has released some additional "B-roll" footage for Killzone Shadow Fall this morning, so check out that footage below. The game is due out this Holiday for the PlayStation 4.​

Read Full Story >>
spiderduck.net
Sandmano4711d ago (Edited 4711d ago )

My most anticipated PS4 game. The hiccups that occurred from the first video when the soldier was going down the stairs seem to be gone.

DoomeDx4711d ago (Edited 4711d ago )

Hmm hiccups? Which?

On topic: This is the same footage as a few months ago.

NewMonday4711d ago

NPC animations look better, my biggest sticking point from the original video

DeadlyFire4711d ago

SAME video. Nothing is upgraded. There were a couple of videos released when Shadow Fall was demoed with couple of playthroughs of the same demo.

Nothing new.

Tibasco4711d ago

Not quite the same footage. Different players for sure.

http://youtu.be/oPrtO1x8pSo... This is from the live PS4 demo.

In the "B-Roll" footage whoever was playing was better than the guy from the live demo. He killed more ppl and used the slow mo ability more. He melee killed a guy by snapping his neck. Towards the end he killed the guy trying to get away who was leaping into the aircraft.

Something I notice in the live demo was that there was this one civilian that took off running right before the explosion went off. I thought that was pretty funny and realistic.

ZodTheRipper4710d ago (Edited 4710d ago )

This looks so amazing, I watchted it 2x in february and watching it again blew me away just like the first time. The combat music is so intense, the city looks incredible and the gameplay looks just like it should. Even the introduction is done very well (I'd call it "sober", not over-the-top but still interesting). Can't wait to play this on launch day!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4710d ago
shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4711d ago

infamous is my #1 but this looks cool!

4711d ago Replies(1)
Enemy4711d ago (Edited 4711d ago )

Playing this on my TV is going to melt my face clean off. Beautiful stuff, and the guns sound like music to my ears. Place looks like a kingdom.

Virus2014711d ago

This game looks amazing. It's definitely one of THE next gen games to look out for. I just wish I could play this with an Xbox One controller (I like the offset analog sticks for FPS). :( But I'm still getting a PS4.

metsgaming4710d ago

third party controllers will have versions with the offset analog sticks.

sigfredod4711d ago

This game looks so great at this early stage, unlike other first generation launch games, the weapon from the ISA looks bad ass, cool multipurpose switching from the holo aim to the scoope, auto extend barrel to switch from assault to sniper rifle, just amazing, seems to use some kind of electromagnetic energy to shoot the bullets no powder flash

MattyG4711d ago

Apparently we play as the VSA now, probably since it takes place on Vekta.

sigfredod4711d ago

and the NPC on the gameplay is so busted at the end lol, i will love to see how will get away from the 3 drones and the 4 dropships without help jejeje

ssj274710d ago

actually the main character role is to keep peace between the two..
and those where just border patrol .. they are not actually going to attack him .. plus I bet it was intend to be like that to show the conflict and the tension ..

Icarus_High4711d ago

It's a variable rail gun also what is with the split of vekta city, is the other side a refugee city for Helghans? I am considering it since every street is colored like the red light district.

Belking4711d ago

Game looks good but my PC games looked like that back in 2007. This is the same footage from Feb.

Conzul4711d ago ShowReplies(2)
flipflopfacts4711d ago (Edited 4711d ago )

when is the last time you've seen ray tracing in a mainstream game. Or do you mean that fake ass building refection in Crysis 2?

Edit: here you go

PLASTICA-MAN4711d ago

Wow this is clearly proves that KZ SF is the first game to use REAL realtime ray-tracing based reflections and lighting and a great argument to the PC stubborn extremists who always throw the Crysis 2 nonsense. Well said !

ssj274710d ago (Edited 4710d ago )

few weeks ago you will be banned for saying this kind of true with facts.. I love how things have change around here!

love how the kzsf tech demos pop out the web and shut op the haters haha they got KILLZONED doing it with stile sine 2006

KILLZONE SF will be the first game using real time raytrace tech.. and the game will run on modern graphics, sounds kilometers of environments in real time 1080p at solid 30fps and PC gamers dare to say PS4 is a 2007 PC HA

show me a 2013 PC running a game like KILLZONE.. I will even let you run COD G with all those features and see if you PC can handle it hahaha.. you know it will fail and go down to 10pfs at lower res.
the ray trace feature will melt your pc card.. and you know it..

but true.. PC soon will get there and pass it.. but stop taking bs pleaseeee

DigitalAnalog4711d ago

LOL, as a PC gamer I laugh at those who feel that 2007 tech that heavily rely on post-processing effects and high-resolution masking as "next-gen" feel is embarrassing.

The moment a true next-gen game built on the PC from the ground up is going to make your statement pretty damn pretentious.

Show all comments (56)
80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
5d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_5d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle5d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit5d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog5d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog5d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad5d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_5d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage5d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda5d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

5d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong31d ago

looks god awful on the base systems

90°

PS5 Sales Pass 92.2 Million Units, Beating Nintendo Switch 2 in the Holiday Quarter

Sony announced its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2025, alongside the traditional update on PS5 shipments.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
74d ago Replies(5)
italiangamer74d ago

Sony and Nintendo are both thriving and I'm happy, thank goodness for them or otherwise the whole gaming industry would be in shambles if they only had PC to rely on!

dveio74d ago

• Total G&NS revenue: 10.5 billion USD
• Operating profit: 900 million USD
• Hardware sales: 8M units shipped
• Software sales: 97M units
• PSN MAU: 132M

vs. Xbox:

• Total gaming revenue: 5.96 billion USD
• nothing else gets reported

__y2jb73d ago

Xbox operating costs are without a doubt eye wateringly high, way way way higher than Sony. GP is costing them an absolute fortune to operate.

Tapani73d ago

That is a very solid operating profit. It's not net, obviously, but still a very healthy amount of cash you make after cost of debt and taxes (+ other expenses), and can invest into R&D and future endeavours. And give back to your shareholders or buy back shares.

DivineHand12573d ago

It would be in Sony's beat interest to not rush next generation. Let 2029 or 2030 be the start of next generation. There is clearly plenty of demand for the PS5 and gamers are not asking for more at this time.

S2Killinit73d ago

Yup especially with the price of tech going up. They already have the PRO to hold them over.

__y2jb73d ago (Edited 73d ago )

Exactly this. Let Xbox wither on the vine for a couple more years and there will be nothing left.

fr0sty73d ago

I fully agree for 2 reasons:

1. Microsoft seems to be in a hurry to release the new Xbox, if they do at all... AMD speculates a 2027 release. This will hurt them in the long run, because:

2. Datacenters are buying up ALL the RAM, and some RAM manufacturers have stopped making RAM for consumer products entirely, while the other remaining ones are scared to ramp up their production capacity to make more RAM because they're worried this whole AI thing is a bubble that is about to pop, and they don't want to be caught holding the bag when it does pop. So, for now, it costs $300-400 for 32GB of DDR5. That's the MSRP for some entire consoles.

If Microsoft drops the new Xbox now, it's going to cost them a fortune. If Sony holds their cards a moment and lets PS5 cook for a while, as it's showing no signs whatsoever of slowing down in sales, then by the time PS6 is ready to drop, RAM prices should have stabilized, allowing Sony to devote much more of their budget towards making PS6's CPU and GPU more powerful, in addition to the tech itself maturing and the available CPU and GPU parts being much more powerful for the same price point than they would be if released today. So, we'd get a super powerful PS6 in say, 2029, that won't have to cost $700-800. They speculate, based on the current specs, that the new Xbox will cost north of $1,000, and that was before the RAM shortage came into the picture. It's definitely going to be even higher now that RAM costs so much.

MS will be shooting themselves in the foot (again) if they try to drop a new Xbox now, and Sony would be wise to capitalize on that mistake by holding their cards a while longer, raking in more of those PS5 profits, and then dropping a new console as soon as the hardware market stabilizes from this AI datacenter BS.

darthv7273d ago

7 years is a hurry...? Its the same amount of time between XBO and series. The same amount of time between PS3 to PS4 and PS4 to PS5. The 360 was 8 years between it and XBO.

If they do release first, and then Sony a year or two later... is it not possible for prices to come down in that time?

repsahj73d ago (Edited 73d ago )

I think Switch 2 beat PS5 during December 2025 that is why the gap decrease to 1m units. Because during black friday, I know PS5 sales is 2:1 against the Switch 2.

And I just want to add that the PlayStation 5 is currently 1.94 million units BEHIND the PlayStation 4 when you align launches. While Switch 2 is 10M ahead against the Switch 1 when you aligned covering it's first 7 months.

S2Killinit73d ago

I think you are forgetting to mention the chip shortages for PS5.

salis84473d ago (Edited 73d ago )

No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly.

PS5 being less than 2m behind PS4 is not a big deal; PS5 had to deal with COVID and ongoing supply and pricing struggles that clearly still exist today. Sales of software are incredibly strong, and the size of the community is bigger than its ever been.

PS5 is well on pace to exceed its early (2021) estimates of 110m by end of life even if that's 2027. PS5 will hit 100m before November and then sell another 6-8M in November + December.

PS5 is doing great, and so is Switch 2, it's good for everyone that they succeed, pitting the two against each other is more damaging than anything related to the sales of the two consoles individually.

repsahj73d ago

"No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly."

majority on this site tells otherwise.

Dexterio73d ago

@repsahj
Yup because they’ve been the anti consumer they are for so long and needs to be humbled 😆

CrashMania73d ago (Edited 73d ago )

I'd be lying if I said I didn't regret my purchase a bit. I mainly bought it for Mario Kart World, but I find it pales in comparison to 8. I'm annoyed that Nintendo charged money for a super barebones 'upgrade' to Jamboree, no new minigames? No new boards? Just some gimmicky low res camera mode. Oh and Midtroid Prime 4 let me down as well, yet to go back and finish it.

I don't want the Switch 2 to fail, it's contributing to a healthier console market with the death of xbox consoles. I'll get use out of mine long term, but some of Nintendo's decisions like the ones above just annoy me lol.

jznrpg73d ago

@respahj the only thing I want Nintendo to badly is the 80$ games so they lower the price.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 73d ago
Show all comments (37)