All Channels
Popular
230°

Kinect will be Xbox One's game-changer, says Harrison

Microsoft exec says having camera controller standard will boost dev support, says content will be "more broadly curated"
Much has been made of the Xbox One's TV initiative, possible support for always-on DRM, and plan to discourage used game sales. But in an interview with VentureBeat, Microsoft's Interactive Entertainment Business vice president Phil Harrison put a special emphasis on the system's second-generation Kinect camera.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
ZodTheRipper4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

Yeah, it changed a lot ...but not for the better.
I'm not planning to talk with my console any time soon. Neither do I want a camera in my living room that is always connected to a companies server. And I'm sure people who visit me don't want their faces to be recognized by the system just that it can greet them the next time they come around.

Aceman184760d ago

Didn't they say the same thing about it when it launched on 360?

HammadTheBeast4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

Star Wars Kinect ftw.

Screw Battlefront 3, I wanna dance with Vader.

Its pitiful that the dancing mode was the only one that worked half right.

MaxXAttaxX4759d ago

Wait... he's not saying that Kinect is the Xbox One's trump card, is he?
lol

rainslacker4759d ago

He's implying that it's one of it's trump cards. Most of the reasons he states are why a lot of people are against it though...namely the ability to recognize people, and constantly monitor the user/s.

But it's simple for the end user...so I guess that makes it alright. /s

THamm4760d ago

If devs quit putting out crappy games for $60 then there would be no used game market. Publishers either lower your prices or quit buying reviews.

Mounce4759d ago

I think the literal title should be SLIGHTLY reworded to:

Kinect will be Xbox's One game changer - Aka, the truth. It's the only thing that will change how a game is played but that doesn't mean for the better. It just is a game changer, that's It.

Mr_Nuts4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

Boost dev support.....funny how I've saw more of a negative reaction from them then positive.

Besides least with the PS4 they wont force you to use Move in games but with Kinect being mandatory they will force you to use it...even with exclusives like Halo 5 in the future

GribbleGrunger4760d ago

It's odd that the internet is abuzz with concerns that Sony will copy the second hand strategy, but I find it funny how no one seems to be talking about how PSEye2 will probably be able to do the same thing as Kinect. Why isn't that conversation taking place?

TKCMuzzer4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

Because I think as far as everyone is concerned the PSEye2 will be optional and therefore not always connected.
The concern over Kinect is, that without it you can't use the Xbox one and it's always watching you, yes you.

Disagrees? really? He asked and I answered.
The concern is over how Kinect is being used, it's as simple as that

Ok , that's 2 disagrees, Microsoft have confirmed you need Kinect connected for the Xbox one to function or did I miss read it?

Daves4760d ago

But Kinect isn't optional, I'm guessing the PS4 system isn't designed around PSEye2

GribbleGrunger4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

It doesn't matter if using PSeye2 is optional or not, if it comes with every PS4 then the developers will add Kinect features where they can. It really is telling how people are so willing to believe that Sony will mirror the negative aspects of X1 but not the 'supposed' killer app. I'm just going to wait for E3 to find out.

TKCMuzzer4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

@GribbleGrunger
It doesn't matter if they add the features, YOU, the gamer, still has the choice whether the camera is connected to you PS4 or not. It won't be needed for any navigation etc , it will be an optional extra. Developers won't be forced to add it into games, only if they want to.
I get the feeling you want Sony to build it in and force people to use just to justify Microsoft's decision to do so.

I've owned most consoles including the current ones but some of the decisions Microsoft are making are strange, it's like they just can't leave you to play games and get on with it.

GribbleGrunger4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

'I get the feeling you want Sony to build it in and force people to use just to justify Microsoft's decision to do so.'

No, not at all TKCMuzzer. I want it to be exactly what you want it to be 'optional'. I don't want Sony to force anyone to do anything they don't want to. I'm just pointing out that this discussion could be taking place but instead we have people 'hoping' that Sony copy MS's ante consumer policies. It's as if they've excepted that they're going to get screwed but in order to make themselves feel better, they're wishing it on Sony fans too.

ziggurcat4759d ago

@ gribble:

why are people hoping sony copies MS's alleged anti-consumer policies?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4759d ago
NateCole4760d ago

It's because people don't really care about it. Gamers at least.

wishingW3L4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

just for you:
http://kotaku.com/5958307/t...

On top of it if the Kinect breaks or your dog eats its cord then the console becomes a brick too. XD

sway_z4760d ago

I just read that link...thanks...that's awful!

It's like a damn dictatorship...I'll bet Robert Mugabi will love this console.

GribbleGrunger4760d ago

It would be suicide to implement that at launch, but not once they have a decent install base.

Daves4760d ago

Fact is I have zero interest on Xbone, so this is all irrelevant really.

GamingWorldPeace4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

If you are have zero interest, then why waste 2 bubbles posting on news/opinion piece about it?

4760d ago
BISHOP-BRASIL4760d ago

People are misreading Gribble (just like I too first did).

He's not implying Sony should pull a Kinect, not at all.

What he actually meant is that, when faced agaisnt negativity, MS fanboys keep saying Sony could follow MS with anti-consumer DRM, since it's an open question, wishing Sony to fail just as hard as MS... Yet none of those corporation cheerleaders aknowledge that Sony is in position to actually do everything MS is doing as they had not finished revealing it, even the Kinect 2 features that some perceive as an advantge could all be done optional with PS Eye2. In other words, they only wish for Sony to follow MS in their own fanboy interest.

Ok, this was long and dull... I should just had said "friendly fire, don't shoot, he's one of us", that would've been funnier.

extermin8or4760d ago

Because it doesn't have to be connected, because when the thing is in standby mode its not still going to be listening to everything you say... Looking out for the phrase "console on"-still must process everything you say.... Sony weren't even sure originally if it'd be a separate sale or whatever..

nukeitall4759d ago

Because, we don't know if PS Eye 2 *will* be able to do what Kinect One does. Sony hasn't really shown anything related to it at all.

The main reason why Kinect hOne is able to do what it does is the combination of soje hardware, mostly software and being the leader in that space.

If the rumors are correct about PS Eye 2, then it won't even have HD tracking.

More telling is Sony had to implement a "lightbar" in the controller to detect the player, whereas MS implementation just does it with Kinect. So Kinect One has live proof (it's all over youtube), whereas PS Eye 2 has shown nothing and also indicated extra technology (lightbar) just to do the same.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4759d ago
Godz Kastro4760d ago

Wow, I just made this comment a second ago. Check the tech videos on it. It's so accurate!

Show all comments (60)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio37d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing37d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9237d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit37d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing37d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9237d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay39d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn240d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn239d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown39d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay39d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay39d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac39d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger39d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300039d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde39d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde39d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7541d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_38d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.