All Channels
Popular
160°

Sunday Flashback: What was Sony thinking?

VGR: Seriously, this was the marketing campaign for the last Playstation. Thank you Sony for fueling my nightmares...

Read Full Story >>
vgrevolution.com
Nitrowolf24780d ago (Edited 4780d ago )

lol for some reason I really liked these commercials, but I do admit that they probably didn't do much for them as they had hoped.

Good thing they went with the Kevin Butler Idea later on.

The one that did creep me out: http://www.youtube.com/watc...

I did like when they decided to focus on the games with commercial http://www.youtube.com/watc...

All the butler ones are great though: http://www.youtube.com/watc...

ceed9114780d ago

Welp, never saw that one before - that girl is terrifying, as are the comments on the video.

iGAM3R-VIII4780d ago (Edited 4780d ago )

lol maybe sony used some marketing people on meth :P

RioKing4779d ago (Edited 4779d ago )

Dido, I personally liked these commercials. Although I can definitely see how not everyone would...

PopRocks3594780d ago

Yeah these commercials were pretty damn trippy. Oh well. They could have been more like the PSP squirrels commercial. And besides, we eventually wound up getting Kevin Butler ads and those were hilarious.

kreate4780d ago

I thought those were fake parody commercials when I first saw them lol

Even the japanese ps3 commercials were freaky.

Best PlayStation ads I saw so far was the korean ones.

Oh sony ... maybe the whole time the problem was ur marketing team.

Later though, sony make dot believe was a pretty good ad. But again, thats not a PlayStation ad.

The all stars one was pretty good with all the PlayStation characters coming out, although the ad was interesting, it wasnot geared toward the general public.

Just do what Microsoft does for marketing. Copy exactly what they do.

Hicken4780d ago

Spend far more on marketing than their games?

Pass.

Sony could use better marketing, but they don't need to go THAT far.

kreate4780d ago

Ey man.. the sales gotta be there ;)

nukeitall4780d ago

@Why o why:

"Cant play sales."

A product won't exist too long if it doesn't sell....

Why o why4779d ago

Obviously businesses cant survive without sales

Its almost like you'd prefer sony spend their money on marketing less games better than them spending more of their money on game creation and less on marketing.

Got pads in my hand not calculators. Their bottom lines aren't my primary concern. They pay none of my bills. Im in this for me. Games please.

Outside_ofthe_Box4779d ago

***"Their bottom lines aren't my primary concern. They pay none of my bills. Im in this for me. Games please."***

Quote of the f***ing century...

nukeitall4779d ago

@Why o why:

"Its almost like you'd prefer sony spend their money on marketing less games better than them spending more of their money on game creation and less on marketing."

No, I prefer Sony focusing on surviving, because I want them to succeed. That means a nice balance between marketing and creation.

Now, I don't think Sony lacks marketing at all though.

"Got pads in my hand not calculators. Their bottom lines aren't my primary concern. They pay none of my bills. Im in this for me. Games please."

I'm in this for me too, which means I want these companies to succeed so I can continue to get awesome experiences and please don't make it just about games. I don't just play games, but watch movies, listen to music and do a host of other things too.

Include all of that!

I'm just not so narrow sighted that I want any company to focus on a niche group and then die. They need to expand and as long as they provide me with what I want, I'm happy.

Why o why4779d ago (Edited 4779d ago )

Cause Sony really look like they're in trouble for you to care more about their marketing expenditure over their game creation.

The reason why some are pissed at ms and their change in focus is because they've taken less care of segment you call niche. .. what a terrible apologistic view of things.

Nowhere did I state that x or y group shouldn't be catered to, or that them staying in business isn't important but I buy a product for my benefit primarily not theirs; be it their survival or profits.

Games please, bring enough good ones for all of your customers with good balance and you'll survive. Sony is testament to that. 3 new ips this year... played with pads mate. I'll leave the calculations for the investors and shareholder types..

kreate4779d ago

but sony makes good games already.
they got the gaming department covered.

the reason why their stuff dont sell as they wanted it to is becuz they semi-fail at marketing.

so by this logic, shouldnt sony spend more money on marketing?

i remember in 2006-2008, all i saw on american television was xbox ad after xbox ad after xbox ad. so everyone went out and bought a xbox.

even multi-platform games showed the xbox logo and at the end of the commercial, it said to 'jump into xbox live for the world of entertainment' when the game is also available on ps3

solidjun54779d ago

"No, I prefer Sony focusing on surviving, because I want them to succeed. That means a nice balance between marketing and creation. "

Based on your comment history, what you've just said is a complete and utter lie.

Why o why4779d ago

solidjun5

ha, true, but I didn't mind trying to explain why its still about gaming for me... I've never purchased a console to save a console maker because I'm not a shareholder or management within the company. I'm an end user, a customer. Same as I was when I purchased an import dreamcast or my amiga or whatever.

kreate

If you mean copy ms marketing tactics then I hear ya 100 but money isn't unlimited and there's a trade off with ms's meth, be it forced or simple choice.

They spent less on game internal development of the type of titles they used to. If they could market like they do and produce and nurture studios like sony, it would be the absolute best model and worth emulating. In reality its not, so, if I had to chose a model that benefits my hobby\past time\ addiction the best I'd go for one that yielded the most substance.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4779d ago
AkatsukiPain4780d ago (Edited 4780d ago )

I agree some of the commercials had a question mark in my head like wtf was that? I dont think these commercials were the problem though, it was that sony didnt do enough advertising at the time.

Great thing is they learned from alot of their passed mistakes and been doing a very good job of turning all those things around. Kaz has done a phenomenal job and it looks like it will only get better from here on out.

Also that 30 minute beyond two souls gameplay looks freakin fan-effing-tastic. It will definitely be a must buy day 1 title for me.

Shinra Tensei

Soldierone4780d ago

I think if properly funded, these commercials would have done what they were supposed to do.

They were supposed to be trippy and make you go "wth was that?!" But there wasn't enough of them. I remember literally watching TV more just to wait for one to come on, and never seeing them at all.I saw it maybe once before they went in a different direction.

Show all comments (30)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
34d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted33d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8533d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele33d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk32d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay32d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 32d ago
Athlon10133d ago (Edited 33d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit32d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg32d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10132d ago (Edited 32d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14933d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
46d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_46d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle46d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker46d ago (Edited 46d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit46d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog46d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_46d ago (Edited 46d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog46d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad46d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_46d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage46d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda46d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

46d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong72d ago

looks god awful on the base systems