All Channels
Popular
230°

Xbox 720 Will Most Likely Have the Same Controller

The Xbox 360 controller is the iconic video game controller of this generation. It has just the right amount of buttons and complexity to support all the actions needed for today’s games. With a highly liked and functional controller it wouldn't be surprising if the Xbox 720 has the same controller as the Xbox 360, just look at what the Wii U did.

Read Full Story >>
gamenacho.com
MonkeyNinja4764d ago

I never liked the stick layout on 360 controller. Just my opinion.

Root4764d ago

It's nice when playing First Person Shooters and Driving games but any thing other then that, especialy fighting games it's just not that good in my opinion

It's why I think the Dualshock is still a great controller even today, it's adaptable when playing many different genres and even then it's still good for first person shooters and driving games.

All this "it's too small" crap just came out of no where...I mean no one had a problem with it before the 360 with the Dualshock and the Dualshock 2

Jake_Maguire4764d ago

We were all teens then. Plus nobody complained about standard definition until HD came along. It's called progression.

Root4764d ago

Standard definition wasn't one of those "If it aint broke don't fix it" things while the Dualshock kind of was.....all it needs with each new DS is small improvements which they've done for the DS4.

Jake_Maguire4764d ago (Edited 4764d ago )

What was so broken with SD before HD came along? Please enlighten me because this I gotta hear.
Go ahead...

Here's the gist of it, modern design/tech will almost always render old /tech obsolete and/or archaic.

maniacmayhem4764d ago

@Root
"I mean no one had a problem with it before the 360 with the Dualshock and the Dualshock 2"

HUH!? That's because no one had anything to compare it too.

BLKxSEPTEMBER4764d ago

I disagree and agree with. I agree that the 360 controller sucks for fighters but I think its perfect for all other game genres. I also agree that the DS is great for some fighter like tekken but sucks for six button fighters. I disagree about the DS being good for fps. To me the thumb sticks are to close and my thumbs tend to rub or slip off the controller.

NeverEnding19894764d ago

The Xbox 360 controller is one of the greatest ever. See reviews and any top 10 lists for proof. Not to mention the total lack of complaints (including the d-pad which Microsoft fixed). Also the many similarities between the Xbox 360 controller and the PS4 and Wii U controllers.

Grip change, battery change, possibly a share button (not needed). These are changes we'll see, but otherwise it's essentially the perfect controller. No change needed. When compared to the Dualshock, it desperately needed change and it may have taken Sony 2 generations, but they finally changed it. There has been no major complaints towards the Xbox 360 controller, that's why it'll most likely remain the same.

kickerz4764d ago

Actually your kinda wrong. The only style of game the xbox controller aint too good at is fighting games (like you said) but thats it. If they fix the D pad like NYC_gamer stated below, it will be the perfect controller. whenever i pick up a playstation controller it just feels so cramped and uncomfortable. (just my opinion)

DOMination-4764d ago

Its definitely rubbish for 2d games. Its gard to fix the dpad because Sony has a patent on it but i hope MS find a solution. The transforming dpad was better but still not as good as the dualshock. Other than this, there are no problems with it.

4764d ago
BISHOP-BRASIL4763d ago

It's funny how people just don't understand the point in having assymetrical sticks. The idea wasn't ever to have your hands positioned assymetrically, but instead to keep a confortable grip while you use the left stick and the face buttons.

Yet we keep hearing how it's great for shooters... No it isn't! In shooters you control both sticks most of the time, so much that the most used actions (like shoot or zoom) are assigned to shoulder buttons instead of face buttons (you only have 2 thumbs after all), so it would be better off with a symetrical layout.

And just like in shooters, you control the camera all the time for most modern games, in fact that's why most action games today are said to have shooter mechanics even if you don't have a gun, you want to "aim" (look at your objective) all the time, instead of the old fixed camera (when you usually just look at your character's actions).

In fact, the best scenario for assymetric sticks is exactly that, a fixed/automatic camera, when you have one thumb on the left stick and the other on the face buttons of such a controller you are gripping evenly with both hands. So you could say that said controller would be great for fighting games (even 2D fighters as long as you play on the stick, if you go for the D-pad you are holding it assymetrically again), sidescollers, some hack'n'slash (ironically God of War still uses a fixed camera better suited to 360 controller) and most RPGs (not so much on WRPGs as they are usually played with shooter mechanics, but indeed they still use face buttons a lot).

Looking through that logic it seens the genres people praise the most on 360 are better suited for PS3 controllers and the other way around is also true (fighter - on sticks -, h&s and RPGs on PS3 you never get a perfect grip), which alone should make me sound crazy enough for you to stop reading.

Still, I guess most people simply don't get the real practical difference between symetric and assymetric sticks... Which actually is minimal. The fact you are gripping differently with each hand will only lead you to disconfort after at least some 4 hours playing straight, a controller is simply not heavy enough to couse such an effect much long before. So the whole layout wars going here is really making a volcano out of an ant hill.

End of the day I guess we'll just get used to either one we play the most and than come back with absurd claims about which controller have the better layout when in fact it has little to do with layout and a lot more to do with shape preferences (heavily dependent on your hands shape and size) and components quality (like PS3 is perceived as better for fighters because of the better D-Pad or 360 in shooter for the better analog sticks)... One thing I guess we can all agree through, there's no such a thing as a perfect layout for every game and surely not a perfect controller for every gamer.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4763d ago
maddfoxx4764d ago

The d-pad on the 360 controller makes playing fighters impossible.

NYC_Gamer4764d ago

That's fine long as the D pad is improved

sak5004764d ago (Edited 4764d ago )

Agreed. I have 5 controllers and hope they are compatible with 720. The only beef was teh D-pad and they had already improved it recently but those controllers they were selling separately.

PS2/3 controllers on the other hand feel so plasticy and small and both sticks in center cause cramps.

IronFistChinMi4764d ago

It's already confirmed that they use a different wireless technology for Durango pads, so you won't be able to use your 360 ones.

JeffGUNZ4764d ago

Nothings confirmed, as MS hasn't said anything but a date when they will reveal it. You're gong off "leaked" info which isn't fact.

sak5004764d ago

@IronFist

MS hasn't officially even acknowledged existence of 720 and yet you have confirmed report of different wireless technology? Care to share the link?

kickerz4764d ago

agreed, also maybe make the sticks a bit more tuff, if u run around alot in Halo, you have to push the stick in, and after many many hours of playing the outer plastic bit on the stick wears off a little, but yeah other then that its fine.

mcstorm4764d ago

Nyc I agree but I would like it to be as light as the Wiiu pro controller include rechargeable batterys and improve the dpad. I think if they do that they will have the best controller again. I like what Sony have added to the ds4 but I always get cramp when using a Sony controller. I have since the ds4 as I have quite big hands.

WildArmed4764d ago

Agreed. Only complaint of mine for the 360 controller.

Though I never really played fighting games so it's luckily never been an issue.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4764d ago
Qrphe4764d ago

I wish they'd go back to the S controller. That controller had better triggers and a better d-pad.

colonel1794764d ago

I loved Xbox S controller! Better than 360's in my opinion. I wonder what they will come up with this time around.

360 and S controllers are some of the best controllers, but the most comfortable one is Gamecube's.

I had never liked the Dualshock controller until I got a PS3 and now I love it. The new Dualshock 4 is looking much more improved and comfortable.

Jake_Maguire4764d ago

Change the D-pad. Perfect controller for man sized gamer hands.

Riderz13374764d ago

And what would you define as "man sized gamer hands". So because I dislike the 360 controller my hands aren't "manly"?

zebramocha4764d ago

@bitby funny! :) 

Riderz13374764d ago Show
BitbyDeath4763d ago

Wait so man hands means you have small hands? I always thought it were the opposite. If you had large/regular size hands you'd have a bigger circumference between your index and thumb and would not find it so hard to reach the buttons and sticks all at once.

Think we should rename man hands to midget or just plain small hands. IMO

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4763d ago
Denethor_II4763d ago

"Change the D-pad. Perfect controller for man sized gamer hands."

For fat North American hands.

Bigpappy4764d ago

That would be great if true. It would save me some good cash. Plus the 360 controller is already quite comfy.

T24764d ago

I find it too fat , requires you to push in with index finger hurting the inside ... I dunno could be me ... Size is ok but too thick, heavy and AA batteries? Room for improvements

sak5004764d ago

The controller are for avg sized males not small dwarfs.

flyingmunky4764d ago

That is exactly why Microsoft will not allow you to use your old controller. They will not pass up a chance to accessorize the new console to pick up more money.

ichimaru4764d ago (Edited 4764d ago )

correct me if im wrong, but hasn't Every console launched a new controller design? ds2,3, and4 aren't compatible, why is ms "money hungry" for launching a new stick

KaBaW4763d ago (Edited 4763d ago )

Well, that would be because Sony is the 'perfect' company who only create and use new controllers for chances of improvements. Duuuuh.

Show all comments (79)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot14d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle14d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7714d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk7718d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
19d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster300019d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv7219d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit18d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

19d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania19d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit18d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot0718d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr19d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box19d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr18d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire9519d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv7219d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--19d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv7218d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket19d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm18d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde18d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster9218d ago (Edited 18d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
maximusprime_19d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

19d ago
BeHunted19d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

19d ago
CrashMania19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit18d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster9218d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

18d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
shadowT19d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers19d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz14919d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot0718d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)