This game was a nice reboot in my opinion. I don't understand why it didn't sell well...ditto for Hitman: Absolution :/

geez nothing going for MS these days LOL

I'm asking myself "what's the point" of these comparisons...

we are still doing these? why?

TR was a good game. Definitely deserves a sequel.

I never looked at it that way. I just recall the company complaining about lack of sales. They said both games sold just below their minimum projected sales goal...Does anyone else recall that article? I believe it may have been on N4G.

No trolling, but since when ps3 games look better than xbox 360 games? ( Multiplatform ) Because xbox fanboys friends of mine always used this argument against me:P

bit late to be honest

Tits.

The lighting on the 360 version is too bright. You can easily tell that the PS3 version has more contrast to enhance the darkening of the shadows on Laura's body and in the environment itself.

/gets disagrees anyways :\

Normally it's the other way around where the 360 version has better contrast and more vibrant colors. With the coming of the next gen MS & Sony consoles, these comparisons seem to not matter anymore.

here we go again with very very little difference, next!!!

Soon, the sun and clouds will be compared if it didn't already happen.

Larua is hot and has a very sexy voice it is a really great game and looks great no matter the console its on. If you own a Xbox360 it looks great on the Xbox360. If you own a PS3 it looks great on the PS3 and if you own a PC she looks great on the PC. Great game I hope other companies learn from Larua on what its like to reboot a franchise best reboot I have played. I still can't believe this game skipped the Wii-U. I was looking forward to trying out the Wii-U version and the challanges that came with the game and the Wii-U tablet.

here we go again. FIX UR CONTRAST for the last time

Think about this....the next Tomb Raider is going to be on Ps4. Imagine how good thats going to look.

LOL why do they still make these stupid ass comparisons? Truly pointless.

is this 2006?

why does headline say " gameplay comparison" when its really a graphics comparison......

They are still doing this 7 years down the line...

I will buying for pc when its 10 bux.

I am a huge UC fan.And I think this Tomb Raider is everything I want UC3 to be.To me to really rocks and I hope ND rises to the challenge.

PS3 is slightly better (it is a slightly more graphically advanced system afterall), but if you have to sit them side by side and compare, the differences aren't big enough to affect gameplay

Make the games longer, with more replayability & awesome online features that offer both fun & versatility, then 1st & foremost, eliminate ALL dlc, unless it adds both extra online maps, weapons & more, as well as an extra chunk of offline campaign, instead of just ripping us off with the precedence set by H-Activision, when you pay $22Au ($14.95US) for a few crappy extra online maps.....I mean what a joke.
Bring back the industry that I grew up with, & lets BUY our games, thus meaning that they are OUR property, not frigging hired, or on borrowed time.

Add masses of the features I mentioned above, & release the game with more content, as opposed to once again, following Cr-Activisions concept of chopping up already finished games, so you can sell the rest of them in a step release fashion. Give us our full games, as we pay the full price of admission.
I would gladly pay $10-$20 more for a game that offers more for my money.
I mean, everyone complained about GTA4 & slammed it, but guess what???? The game is awesome, & offers far better value for money than mostly every other game around, as it had pretty awesome offline campaign gameplay, as well as limitless online, with a ridiculous amount of online modes, compared with 99.9% of other titles.
Games that are more like Far Cry 3, as opposed to COD12, as FC3 is a massive, living, breathing, 3D jungle-like world, & the game is like a open world, GTA-esque effort, & then there is also the online & the awesome map maker.
Then throw in titles like LBP 1&2 (which, I'm positive Bill Gay-tes & MS hate) that offer the option to make your own levels & gameplay.....& with tools that offer such freedom, so as to allow you make a 1st person shooter on, or racer, or whatever.......I mean, other developers & publishers must despise the Media Molecules, Crytek's, etc, etc, as they are basically offering consumers too much value for money, thus potentially hurting sales for future releases......I mean, the fact is, that we gamers are paying more & more, for less & less.
So, lets scrap all this releasing half games that need patches from the get go, & that have been stripped back, & had 10 or so of the online maps taken from the final release, & lets get full, fluffed out, VALUE FOR MONEY.

Because the fact remains, that us gamers WILL buy pretty much everything that we have, & next gen, that is unlikely to change, as I will see game Unchartered & buy it upon release day, then the next day Tomb Raider will release, & I will buy that as well, the next month GOW:J will release & that gets bought on day 1 as well, & boom there's GOW:A on store shelves & whammo, I've got it.
I guess I am saying that I will continue to buy & support developers of games that immerse me into there world, games I love for the story, as well as for the gameplay, the action & set pieces & all the other little things that make up great games.

I will say, the online is far below UC's standard, & needs some work on both camera & other things, such as the movement, smoothness, controls, etc, etc.

I played both on a 3D tv and they looked the same whoever made this is trying to make PS3 look better