All Channels
Popular
120°

Things Nintendo DIDN’T Do First

GXC: "It’s common for debates to spawn in gaming communities about the different gaming companies and their products. One of these debates happens to come from the claim that “Nintendo did it first” or that other companies are “copying” Nintendo with their games, consoles, and other ideas.

It is true, Nintendo has become a bit of the patriarch of gaming. They saved the industry from its collapse in the 80′s. Nintendo introduced the most famous branding and most recognizable franchises in gaming. Nintendo did do a lot of things first for sure, and the industry likely wouldn’t have gotten to where it is now without them. Still, the fact remains, Nintendo didn’t do everything first. Let’s take a look at some of the things that Nintendo didn’t do first and some things that they may have adopted from other companies."

Read Full Story >>
gamerxchange.net
gamefiles4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

lol not that lies are ahead but whose gonna take this article serious when the author makes shit up like;

"Many have credited games like The Outfoxies, beat ‘em ups like Streets of Rage, and Battletoads & Double Dragons as some of the inspiration for Super Smash Bros".

I mean, is that what Masahiro Sakurai said inspired him to make smash bros ? or do I smell fanboy raunchiness ??

dboi7874796d ago

Where in the quoted statement does it say that Masahiro Sakurai was inspired by those games? The statement clear as day reads that several people have credited those games, not the creator of Super Smash Bros. If there is any "fanboy raunchiness," it's clearly on your part.

gamefiles4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

but I never said that the article says that sakurai said that. I clearly stated that sakurai would be one of the ones to know WHAt INSPIRED HIM to make smash. the author says that "many credit other games for the inspiration of smash" lol, why not ask the Main source of smash what inspired him to make smash?, instead the authour of this article farts shit out his mouth?? ha haa .
If the author wants real answers to his ponderings, hese got to get them from the MAIN sources.
losers will believe anything on the internet.

lol poop scoop article.

fanboys need to pay attention.

lol sony, riding nintendos wiener all these years.

Dylila4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

proper read with a lot of information i didnt know. nice article with a lot of facts which are very welcomed.

LOL_WUT4796d ago

Well said Dylila ;)

Too bad that some "people" are going to overlook this well written article. ;)

gamefiles4793d ago

what does it smell like?

dboi7874796d ago

This article is surprisingly great for the topic matter. Lot of points even I didn't know. Enjoyed the read, man, excited for more! :D

Canary4796d ago

I've never seen anyone claim that Nintendo did any of those things first.

The only "firsts" I've seen attributed to Nintendo are 1) the first use of a lock-on mechanic in an action/adventure game with Ocarina of Time, and 2) first use of a quest journal in an RPG/adventure game with Majora's Mask.

I have no idea if either is true.

rainslacker4796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

I see people claiming Nintendo came up with a lot of things that they didn't. I've never seen the first point in this article, but it's understandable that people would believe they invented video games, or at least the home console.

Outside of that, Very few technologies in the console world were truly created by the console makers themselves. Sometimes the actual implementation of technologies can be credited to them however. Everything you see in consoles was mostly developed independent of consoles(maybe not the D-pad which was a reaction to console joysticks sucking at the time).

One thing Nintendo is very good at though is bringing these technologies into the mainstream, and marketing them to be a successful product. No one can ever deny their achievements, but technology is generally independent of gaming.

It's really all semantics. If something works, then why shouldn't other people try to use it or adapt it or improve on it. That's how innovation works.

SoundGamer4796d ago

You would be surprised how many things Nintendo fans claim Nintendo did first.

Pick any of the many popular Nintendo centered websites out there and you'll see these thoughts in the comments and forums.

Not only Nintendo fans, but just people who don't know much about video games. I used to work in games retail and I can confirm that these misconceptions are sadly prevalent.

BosSSyndrome4796d ago

The Dreamcast didn't have a screen on the controller, it had a HOLE.

gamer424796d ago (Edited 4796d ago )

A factual article indeed, but most of these are obvious. (I mean who really thought nintendo were the first platformers, to use disc based gaming, and especially online gaming)except to fanboys. The main point of this article isn't to discredit nintendo at all but to point ot some things nintendo didn't do first. The only problem I have with this article is the last part of the 3D part, it's just they could have put some earlier examples of glasses free 3D. Besides that I really enjoyed this article. Like he said "We should be glad that advancements and innovations are made in technology and in gameplay – no matter who did it “first.”"

TL;DR good read

Show all comments (26)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7750d ago (Edited 50d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS49d ago (Edited 49d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer75d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi74d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure73d ago (Edited 73d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer75d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot74d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box74d ago (Edited 74d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno74d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay74d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno73d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK73d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)