All Channels
Popular
410°

Tiny huge 1TB optical disc

It is called the TeraDisk and it is really small, like a ordinary CD/DVD. But it's really huge in terms of space. 1 TB (1000 GB). How can this be done? The process is easy (or not). All existing optical media record data on semitransparent layers. A regular CD has 1 layer and a Blu-Ray disk has up to 8. The reason nobody can add more layers on a regular CD/DVD/Blu-Ray disk is because when the light passes through these layers it becomes distorted and by the time it reaches the final layers it becomes almost impossible to read/write on the disk.

TeraDisk achieved the 1TB limit by using 200 layers, each storing 5GB of data. So basically the data support stay the same (TeraDisk will be made out of the same plexiglas like material used in other disks) but the write/read laser technology is completely new. They say it's going to be cheap and it will be available for the public in 2010.

For more info on how this is done click the link

sak5006649d ago

Care to elaborate? If its cheaper and bigger capacity why can't PCs and maybe movie studios look into it? Oh yes, you dont want BD to fail that's why.

mighty_douche6649d ago

It has nothing to do with Blu-Ray, please leave your console loyalty at the door, this is technology, nothing to do with console's.

1000gb on a disc IS pointless, they dont work with any current readers so will never recieve mainstream support, no one requires that level of storage on a disc, this is more a tech show piece than anything else.

Blank 25gb BR disc = £10, how much do you think these will cost?

sak5006649d ago (Edited 6649d ago )

SO you want to be stuck with DVD 9 / 18 and BD 25/50/100 gb for rest of ur life? If everybody thought like you we would be still using 5 3/4 inch floppy disks.

BTW: Do u remember or maybe you were not born then, when dvdrom/writers first appeared. They were costing in thousands of USDs. Look at the prices now.

mighty_douche6649d ago

ah so your mind set is simple, bigger = better right?

technically correct, but only if there is need/demand for that size, there isnt for this, maybe in 50 years or so but not now, please explain to me exactly why you would need a 1000gb of storage on a disc? currently, nothing.

no need/demand = no point.

sak5006649d ago (Edited 6649d ago )

LOL and Bill Gates once said 640kb is enough.

I have 580GB in my Pc and 250 external drive.

What if Kojima gets his hand on this?

TheExodus6649d ago

@mighty_douche: "No one requires that level of storage on a disc." You can't be serious, because I already have 6 1TB Hitachi HDDs & 4 500GB Western Digital HDDs feeding my CD/VHS/DVD collection to my iPod, Apple TV & iPhone. Blu-ray fails to excite me because it offers 25GB of storage for about $15 ( http://www.bhphotovideo.com... when I'm already getting 17.5GB of storage out of MiniDV for about $2 ( http://www.dl-electronics.c...

6649d ago
mighty_douche6649d ago

Having this or that size HDD is not related to this arguement. That's fixed memory, i simply dont believe that anybody currently need's a 1000gb CD.

Sorry, if you disagree that's fine, this is MY opinion.

ar6649d ago

It takes years for this kind of techniques to reach the consumer market and they go through several iterations on the way. The first prototypes leading to the format we today know as Blu-Ray where revealed in 2000 (and the research had probably begun a couple of years before).
This is merely a tech demo for future products. Don't expect to see this in the market soon.

Saint Sony6649d ago

"this is technology, nothing to do with console's. "

I lolled, twice.. no.. thrice!

Richdad6649d ago

But technology of future definetly not now but 1000 GB wow if they can get it commercial in 2010 then it will be really great but what if sony used 2 photon technology on BLU Ray 50/9*1000=5.5 TB something imaginary but the idea that this is change in design of player not media read the article, Sony could develop a Blu ray with pixeliglass. But lets see do Teradisk devs really want to seel their technology or get monopoly.

Also if this 2 photon technology comes in 2010, MS would also be bashing it since they are now BLU ray supporters. Just think although MS and Sony are fighting crazy in console war outside but they are good allies ex: Sony audio forge for windows and Widnows for Sony erricsson sets. Maybe After all a wise enemy is better than a foolish friend.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 6649d ago
bilal6649d ago

people should understand that blu-ray is the new format for the next 4-5 years.....this would most likely compete for the next gen of formats (after blu ray)...even if it start in 2010 it would take 2-3 odd years for it to become a mass market product (hence it could be the next gen format)............

also people who think that these formats would be replaced by downloads any time soon are missing the point ....in someways it is like the case when computer was suppose replace paper eventually instead u all know what happened...

TheExodus6649d ago

Blu-ray doesn't have 4-5 years because Memphile will have a prototype of TeraDisc available by the end of this year ( http://www.mempile.com/Pres...

actas1236649d ago

This is not the first disc that claims to have superior storage capacities. Many companies claimed way bigger sizes than Blue ray, however, their discs are not practical and difficult/very expensive to manufacture, that makes them really useless. Also, this Disc has 200 layers!!! You know Blue ray is up to 8 layers so blue ray could go up to 200 GB in space, but its not the time for those 8 GB to be used. A dual layer Blue ray should be more than enough especially with new Blue ray compressing technologies.

DARK WITNESS6649d ago (Edited 6649d ago )

i like how all of a sudden, now blue has won, it is pointless to have anything bigger....yet was that not the argument for why we needed blue, because it is bigger then dvd.

things may be stable for now with blue and the ps3, but who is to say the next xbox wont use this.

if we have already had a few devs talk about using all of the space on blue ( mgs 4 anyone )... if the space is there, they will find something to fill it.

1stKnighT6649d ago

This goes with my original idea of the next 360 going with direct game downloads. Next gen games and hd movies will easily fit on a few of these babies. And with the next wave of hi speed internet already starting, it looks like bluray will not be around as long as dvd or vhs.

Bluray = Lazer Disc

TheExodus6649d ago

DVD (4.7GB) offered 7.2 times the storage capacity of CD (650MB) while Blu-ray (25GB) offers 2.9 times the storage capacity DVD DL (8.54GB). Personally I think Blu-ray & HD DVD are fallback positions that Sony & Toshiba engineers stumbled upon while reaching for something more substantial, but the benefit to consumers is so negligible I'm not sure either should have been finalized into consumers products.

Kami6649d ago

this is enough space for Kojima to put MGS4 on? lol

tweaker6649d ago

1 Terabyte optical Disc? I rather have a terabyte hard disk. Downloads is the future. Just not right now.

Show all comments (35)
30°

Top Racers Need Top Gear – Introducing the Forza Horizon 6 Limited Edition Controller and Headset

Omar writes: "With the Horizon Festival coming to breathtaking Japan, you’ll need the essential gear to prove you’ve got what it takes to become a Horizon Legend as you cruise, drift and explore an open world full of spectacular driving experiences. That’s why we’re happy to announce the newest Limited Edition Xbox Wireless Controller and Wireless Headset collection, featuring inspired designs from Forza Horizon 6. The bright cyan and lime colorways celebrate the Horizon Festival’s recognition of iconic cars and hit music, with special features that are sure to impress any collector."

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
Killer2020UK32d ago

Oh my, that is one gaudy design

40°

EasySMX D05 review

You can get Hall effect controllers slightly cheaper, but you'd struggle to find as feature-rich a package without some heavy, heavy sales.

70°

"It's Just So Lame" - RTGI Modder Thinks DLSS 5 Is Impressive But Shares AI Slop Sentiment

Pascal Gilcher calls DLSS 5 impressive but shares the "AI slop" sentiment, explaining the likely tech behind it and why he dislikes it.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
CrimsonWing6959d ago

I fail to see how this is AI shhhhlllloooop. Looking at the different games they showed, this has made many of them look far better.

isarai_lee59d ago (Edited 59d ago )

It's AI slop because it ignores the artists intent and changes the details ESPECIALLY when it comes to character faces. The scariest part of it is introducing it as the next stage of DLSS, a feature where the current iteration already has controversy surrounding it and for quite a lot of games cannot be fully disabled. So reasonably the precident is already set for what path this could take, and it's not good

blacktiger58d ago

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost and so on. Many of the lighting deletes shadow, including shadow on the face like eyes even chin.

Chard58d ago

Why stop at art when it comes to human input - why not just have AI play the game for us, remove human input altogether

theshizer59d ago

If you don’t like it, just don’t enable it. Personally I think it looks great from the videos I have seen.

isarai_lee59d ago

And what about when you can't? Cause there's plenty of games where you cannot fully disable dlss already, i mean we're well into an era where it's a major crutch for developers to cover up their cut corners, why would this be any different?

blacktiger58d ago

You are playing with people's money and allow Nvidia to scam you.

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost. This is all lie to raise the cost of the graphic card.

Andrew33659d ago

Making characters look more realistic not ok because we want the developer to decide on how the game was intended to look. - Internet

Change entire game through mods thus changing how the developers intended the game to be is ok. - Internet

isarai_lee59d ago

Something consumers can do to a product after they have purchased it, entirely optional and can always be undone with a fresh install

VS

The leading gaming hardware manufacturer making this the next iteration of the main AA/Upscaling technique that is heavily relied upod by modern devs and is not optional in most games.

Not at all the same but nice try

jwillj2k458d ago

At the moment you need 2 5090’s just to get an image on the screen so this is all vaporware until proven otherwise.

Andrew33658d ago

The good news is you can just not use it as well.

Christopher58d ago

It's all about choice in the end. But, I would say that calling it 'more realistic' is quite a stretch. It looks like AI art, and that's rarely realistic.

Urrakia3458d ago

All the comments I see are reminding me of how we got to the current state of gaming when microtransactions were first introduced: "It's completely optional guys, we promise! If you don't like it just don't buy it!"

I think we all know how that ended up.

Popsicle58d ago (Edited 58d ago )

I had the same exact thought the first time this was brought up in a separate article about a week ago. Took me straight back to the conversations surrounding “horse armor.” Just don’t buy it they said. Years later, many IPs I previously enjoyed are so infected with monetization schemes that I don’t even consider purchasing them anymore.

DLSS 5 and the like are the same thing wrapped in a different package. History rhymes but many of us never learn from it.

blacktiger58d ago

Biggest Scam. Overrides lighting and shadow. So why keep Ray tracing? It's all a scam to raise graphic card. We now see Nvidia with Microsoft downturn anything against them. Sony is next!