All Channels
Popular
150°

How often should new consoles be released?

TGBuzz: With the release of multiple new consoles including the Xbox 720 and PS4 just around the corner, their release dates beg the question of how long should it take for new consoles to come out? It has been almost eight years since the Xbox 360 first appeared in 2005, and it will be seven years since the PS3 came out. Waiting seven or eight years for a new console seems absolutely ridiculous to most people, because it is!

iGAM3R-VIII4831d ago

How is waiting 7-8 year ridiculous for people. It can't be earlier because a console needs to live for at least 5 years in my opinion, and the longest is 10 years. Personally I think the current stages of this are perfect.

SethAFitzgerald4831d ago

Because by the time it reaches 5 years, the hardware is far outdated. Compare a console right now to a gaming PC, amazing the difference right?

iGAM3R-VIII4831d ago

Yea thats what i am saying, I think a console can live for at least 5 years but 8-10 at max

Godchild10204831d ago (Edited 4831d ago )

If I'm a console gamer, I don't need to compare my console to a gaming PC. Most gamers or people that purchase consoles, are not worried about what the differences between the games they can be played on a console that they are buying and what can be achievable on a PC that they had no prior knowledge of.

I'm not trying to say console gamers lack the knowledge, but they don't care because they don't know. I could've bought a PS3/360 for 400 dollars a few years back, but back then and even now it would cost me close to 600-800 dollars to buy a great rig to play Crysis 3 or Watch Dogs.

When you think about it, I can upgrade my home console(s) every 5 to 10 years, while PC gamers would have to do it, maybe 2-4 years just to play the same games, kinda sucks right. Please correct me if I'm wrong, because I know little about PC gaming.

EDIT: The only reason I say 2 to 4 years, because all I hear is how a new graphics card is coming out each year and how some (Not on this site) PC gamers are getting it to play X game on higher setting because their old Y card can't achieve that level.

Just look at it, home consoles are getting Crysis 3, Watch Dogs, Battlefield 4 and other PC Multiplatform games. Whether it's with less players or whatever, home consoles still got/getting it, 8 years into it's life cycle. So, 5 to 10 years is not bad for the console gamer.

classic2004831d ago

I think 5 or 6 years should be the deadline for new hardware.

Hicken4831d ago

Who cares about PC when talking about consoles? Given how quickly PC advances, it's realistically just a year or two before consoles are outdated.

But I don't buy consoles to keep up with PC specs.

knowyourstuff4831d ago

It isn't always about graphics for some people. Some of the biggest sales volume of consoles are made even after the next console is released. This may sound crazy to some people but the PS2 was still selling 90,000 units a month right up until they stopped production. 7 years is plenty long, unless you do what Microsoft is planning, where you will never need to buy another console. This means they will either work on streaming games, or allowing people to buy upgrades to their console.

unapersson4831d ago

I don't really see that it matters that much, the graphics and effects may be nicer but the games are hardly a big jump over what you get on a console. A big gaming rig may be packed with power but it rarely seem to be used for more than keeping up with the higher resolution of PC monitors.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4831d ago
4831d ago Replies(1)
solid_warlord4831d ago

Who cares about PC. Its not not mainstream. U got to youtube, people that talk about games or do commentary are usualy playing on console games. Consoles are tailored for the average joe. U think that most console gamers care about how much better PC graphics and frame rate are..then ur deluded. When u look at console games like CoD. It makes 1 billion every year. It dominates in industry software sales. Its hardly a game that is an example of graphical masterpiece. People on PC hardly play CoD. The needs and breeds of those those two different oriented gamers are in a different league. Console gamers come in differet variety... casuals, core and the real hardcores. PC are for hardcores and enthusiasts who are willing to spend and upgrade every year or two for expensive latest tec. Consoles and PC should not be compared as they used to.

SethAFitzgerald4831d ago

No, if you get good graphics cards and cpu's when building a PC, you can make it last for 4-5 years.

Summons754831d ago

Before 5 years was acceptable. Now it should be 10 starting with ps4 - ps5

riverstars864831d ago

Definitely not, the PS4 and 720 will be inferior to PC games from the outset, 10 years from now, I better be playing a PS5.

dirthurts4831d ago

I feel like 4 years is the perfect amount of time.
After that, I just start getting bored :/

tigertron4831d ago (Edited 4831d ago )

Five - six years is acceptable to me.

Show all comments (39)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio26d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing26d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9226d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit26d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing26d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9226d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
29d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted28d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8528d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele28d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk28d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay28d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
Athlon10128d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit28d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg27d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10127d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14928d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay28d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn228d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn228d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown28d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay28d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay28d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac27d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger28d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300028d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde28d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde27d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)