All Channels
Popular
310°

Microsoft Will Most Likely Sell "Durango" Like A Cable Box

One strategy that Microsoft has done with the Xbox 360 is subsidize the cost of the console, and then have the consumer pay monthly for the Xbox Live service. With recent rumors and other indications, there is a strong possiblity that “Durango” will be primarily sold in this manner. There is a chance that Microsoft will subsidize their box, the “Durango”, and have the consumers pay every month for the service, Xbox Live. Here are a few reasons this seems logical.

Read Full Story >>
thestylishjerk.com
Root4822d ago

Probably with the way they've been going

Slowly transitioning out of the gaming industry, I mean they most likely would just drop everything now and say "We're done" but they don't want to loose the gamer audience they've built up over the years.

They could make it so much like a cable box with the odd exclusive Halo, Alan Wake, Fable to keep bringing core gamers back.

They are probably trying to see how long they can last before loyal Xbox fans start questioning them. I mean they've gotten this far while forcing casual stuff down our throats.

stylishjerk4822d ago

You said exactly everything I have been thinking. They will release the yearly Gears of War and Halo sequels. Then they will depend on 3rd party support to handle the rest of the gaming sector. Their main focus will be media and Kinect for their next system.

JoySticksFTW4822d ago

"They are probably trying to see how long they can last before loyal Xbox fans start questioning them."

We've already seen that happening to a degree.

Many primarily Xbox fans have declared they will be switching over to PS4 next gen, but not because of any released or rumored system specs.

They're seeing Sony's commitment to release new and varied titles late in console cycles. It happened last gen when greats like GOW2 and SotC were releasing when PS3 was coming out. And this gen it's been PSABR, TLOU, and Beyond releasing late in the cycle.

These last few years, MS have given us the shaft. Those games that got me and many other to buy 360's have dwindled or gone multiplatform as MS seems more focused on the casual market and conquering the living room now.

And we've seen some 360 fans are feeling fatigued from the same offerings year after year. MS needs to mix in quirky, different, and new IP's with their tried and true exclusives the whole generation. And there's no track record or anything that indicates MS understands this for next gen.

darthv724822d ago

their deal with ATT uverse that enabled the 360 to act like a uverse receiver. Unfortunately that deal expired and the service is no longer supported on the new dash but it is sort of what gave them the idea to continue to pursue TV relations with other providers as well as networks.

The idea of the one box that does everything isnt limited to MS. People often forget that sony tried it with the PSX DVR system in JP. Now had that come to the states or other territories, who knows how well it would have been received.

If the next xbox can do my uverse connection then Im sold. It saves me a rental fee for the box I have now. Chances are they will try to partner with various providers like Comcast, Charter, Verizon and possibly....even dish or directv.

Gamers dont want to hear this but the number of consumers out there that are looking at convenience in a single device far outnumbers the gaming community. By a long shot.

Ms is willing to take that risk while sony plays it safe. And to think, sony is more of a content provider than MS so why are Sony prolonging the inevitable? They need to be as serious about this as the rest of the industry.

Its no longer about MS vs Sony...both of these companies are having to compete with the increasing amount of smart devices that are out or coming to market.

Moonman4822d ago (Edited 4822d ago )

But it's sad...I think it will backfire on them personally. You don't bite the hand of gamers. I can't see my mom wanting a Xbox for cable...lmao.

stylishjerk4822d ago

As a gamer I feel sad about saying this, but this could be very lucrative for Microsoft. Let's say Microsoft starts working with Verizon. A "soccer mom" walks in and sees the shiny new Xbox. A store representative will talk to her, and then she will say, "You mean I can watch and record my shows by talking to Kinect and not need the remote and workout with Zumba..and little Bobby and his Dad can play Call of War or whatever they call it online. Sign us up."

subtenko4822d ago (Edited 4822d ago )

This is a dumb idea imo. People pay tv service for TV... Some people dont even watch much tv but are heavy gamers. This is flawed and I wouldnt want it to be like this personally. So areas cant get service with some companies. So a lot of people couldnt get this and/or would pay for something that they only use half of...Yea left M$ do this and they wont be in the gaming industry like they are now much longer.

That would REALLY make me not want the xbox 720.

Blank4822d ago

Excellent comment moonman & stylishjerk I mean MS is after money period considering they never tried to match PS plus in terms of throwing free games into the subscription not a damn single one! but im only speaking as a gamer wanting more from my leftover gold subscription duration im not gonna renew next year (damn you 35 dollar deals!) but at the sametime im not discounting MS until the they present their offerings for next gen after that ill see for myself if they are worth bothering to give a chance and a renewal

Bigpappy4822d ago (Edited 4822d ago )

I think this is genius. I think most 360 gamers have cable. This would mean one less device plugged in to the outlet. Saves rental fees, space and light bill. This has nothing to do with whether M$ makes more money loosing exclusives or their approach to gaming period. This could end up helping gamers to get an even more powerful GAMING system at a lot less that it may otherwise cost. Before you guys start getting wet dreams over the demise of Xbox as a gaming system, just watch and at least see how M$ presents all of this.
Edit:
stylishjerk gets it. Don't just thing things are bad for gaming because Sony did not do it first. It may not be a gaming feature, but it could turn out to be a big freaking deal.

@ RememberThe357: Agree, tis is what happens when companies compete. Sony will jump on this in a second if it takes off. Just like Netflex and all the other stuff. Just like M$ will have to impress their gaming base after the PS4 reveal.

fei-hung4822d ago

It won't be cheaper because if MS sell it as a cable box, you will be paying rent on it on a monthly basis. XBL will be one of the subscriptions you will have to pay not to forget a possible one off join up fee to go with the box.

Another important thing you forget is, not all cable boxes are free. Here in the UK, SKY and Virgin both charge extra if you want their latest box. SO you end up having to pay for:

- installation fee
- box fee
- monthly subscription

in other words, it may be cheaper as you may not have to pay $400 on day 1, but over 5 years, you may end up paying $600+ as well as being tied into a contract.

Qrphe4822d ago

I agree as far as acting as a cable box, I was expecting this from the Wii U with TVii but it ended up falling well below expectations. Kinect-interactive TV programs sound pretty cool too.

Biphter4822d ago

I've been doing all those things for the last 5 years on my PS3. Cost per month? $0. Play TV FTW. One good thing about being in Europe I guess!

mcstorm4822d ago

@Bigpappy I agree this could work. 2 years ago I decided to ditch sky and got a play tv and skygo at home and switched between the 360 and ps3 for tv as I lived in a studio apartment and it worked out cheaper for me as sky could only offer me one input so I could not record. I had it for around 18 months and watching football games on skysports and using Xbox chat was a great idea especially when your team was playing a friends team.

I now have sky+ in my front room but got a 2nd Xbox for the back and a new ps3 for the front and have that setup for the bedroom and it still gets used but more by the other half.

If Microsoft can get it all right then why not. I now have a Wiiu and have spent quite a few weekends playing games on the Wiiu pad screen and had soccer Saturday on the tv. If Microsoft could offer something like this on the next Xbox ide be interested if it was not a sky high price.

People need to see all the next gen consoles are not totally about games as they will all offer things like Facebook twitter Skype YouTube so why not live tv?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4822d ago
Rageanitus4822d ago

The problem is Sony is more Geared to Media vs MS.
They have alot more content rights on the Market vs MS.
Let alone they do not have all the things you find in the living room for entertainment. Not saying Sony products are awesome... some really are NOT but they for sure have a stronger foothold in the Entertainment concept.

If MS is heading towards Kinect / Media combo, the future can be very shaky! but also unknown

Good_Guy_Jamal4822d ago

Seems SONY fans have more to say about the next xbox than anyone else these days. . .and its always negative but being that n4g is nothing but a playstation fret party the agrees are at a all time high.
I'll employ the wait and see option on the nextbox.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4822d ago (Edited 4822d ago )

"Seems SONY fans have more to say about the next xbox than anyone else these days."

cuz they are gamers who like companies who make games.
I know this makes no sense to you but it's true.

If they charge for multiplayer no buy.. fair enough?

Also if they release at the same price xbox will be $60 more for live. I would use that extra cash for a ps4 game. For most that would be xbox + $120 extra day 1 for a game and live. If MS was a car salesman they would charge you extra for the steering wheel.

JamieL4822d ago (Edited 4822d ago )

Really shutup? Because I have played a few games from MS, and I think it's more like you are just so insecure with who you are and what you're about that you cling to this "I’m THE extreme gamer mentality" so hard that what’s really important fades away. You are here all the time trolling, bashing MS while sucking Sony off. It’s really kind of sad. I remember when punk ass troll comments like yours bothered me, now they just make me shake my head and laugh at how petty your view of life is. Good luck finding a girl and having then raising kids with a world view like that, hope your PS4 keeps you company, but hell with all the new social features you’ll have a ton of new “friends”.

007Bond4822d ago

Haters gonna hate, go play with your move stick buddy

UnholyLight4822d ago

@Root

You must be pretty dumb if you cant figure out how to not have casual stuff forced down your throat. I don't seem to have any problem whatsoever.

Nobody is forcing you to play Kinect, can't rape the willing

miDnIghtEr20C_SfF4822d ago

Is it just me? Or are you people INSANE thinking that MS is abandoning it's gaming audience.

YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE TO THINK THAT!!!!

TheKayle4822d ago (Edited 4822d ago )

lol....why a company that have the same marketshare as sony (while is on the market by the half of sony time) and get from that marketshare more money than sony (we already know how much they lost with ps3,psvita,psmove) should go out from the gaming industry saying "we're done" ....

i think that ppl will eat back everyword about the new xbox...and at the end will be such funnn

before ms leave that market ..looking at the right things is more probable that sony bankrupt

now obv they will sell ps4 already in loss....lets see if ms give them another big kick in their ass like they did last gen with the x360 (moneytalking of course)

im seeing more the opposite..Sony adding social......a gimmick share button.....a low specs..copy of a kinect camera (without any sensor)....mediamolecule going soooo casual with a gimmick game that can target childrens by 6-8 years old

@root
yeah they going casual..adding just some games like fable,gears,halo,destiny,watch dog,bioshock infinite,pgr,forza,forza horizon,star war 1313,crysis,bf,cod,etc etc etc.........damn u right they dont have that great ps4 puzzel game "The Witness"....they r dooooomeeeed!!!! ahahaha

but at the end...r u serious approving bullshit article from a guy that in the same BLOG post this shit?

" http://thestylishjerk.com/2...

" http://thestylishjerk.com/2...

pls guy....close this topic...is so much stupid

is better he continue to do some jerk

Aceman184822d ago

meh i already have cable with FIOS, and i dont need my game system to be a cable box. besides when i buy my consoles i just pay the upfront cost.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4822d ago
Godmars2904822d ago (Edited 4822d ago )

There will be two Xboxes. One a full console, the other a cable box. Both will be useable as a box, but there'll still be an option for a standalone system.

And of course the standalone will be expensive, while the box is cheaper. Available via a lease through a cable provider.

dcbronco4822d ago (Edited 4822d ago )

That's what so many aren't seeing. This could be an option from your cable company. There have been rumors of two 720s. One that was just a STB with casual features. The other a full Xbox. The thing is a lot of people pay $12-15 a month for a DVR. If MS handled the DVR services and provided full gaming for $15 a month including Live on a full 720, that is a better deal.

And remember the leaks from last year were of a modular system that most thought was about upgrading. Instead it was about making parts that could be reconfigured for different purposes. TVs, STBs and many other things. Even if they sell fewer consoles, they will have the potential of selling a whole lot more games because there are a lot more people with cable than there are gamers. The standalone could still be really cheap because the APU is cheap. Especially if they go withan ARM APU and AN AMD APU like the leak outlined(It had two ARM, But one will be AMD).

This is the cheapest way to get a $400 dollar console into as many homes as possible quickly. Pay $99 to the cable company and DVR charges for 2 years and then it's yours. They could even undercut Motorola(The Motorola boxes suck anyway) and replace their STBs for all customers. They could be going after Tivo on top of Sony.

Look at the MS document on this site. It was their plan all along.

http://gamerant.com/xbox-72...

RememberThe3574822d ago

An interesting why to separate themselves from the pack. But I'm not sure that will work out. Sony could easily counter whatever MS puts forth with their own content. MS could loss gamer interest by focusing too much on services and also loss to Sony in the services category. I really love how competitive this is shaping up to be. We're going to see the best from both of these companies.

Godmars2904822d ago (Edited 4822d ago )

Like the article says, if the strategy works, they wont have to care about "hardcore" gamers. Not directly.

Edit:
I think all Sony needs to do is allow GoogleTV on the system and - boom - DVR. At no cost to either them or the customer.

RememberThe3574822d ago (Edited 4822d ago )

True, and I don't really disagree with the article; it looks like that's where MS want to take the Xbox brand, and more power to 'em. But it also seems like they're risking more than Sony is. Sony could still maintain a grip on the services and gaming. That could leave MS with nothing, and the boss men at corporate pissed off.

Maybe I'm taking this too far (these are just thoughts anyway) and it could be a beautiful neck and neck run again this coming generation. I just want MS to stay on its p's and q's and remember that gaming consoles are for games first. If they want to make the internet version of a cable box they better not try to sell it to us at E3.

EDIT: @EDIT: Thats a thought too. And with the immense memory in the system it shouldn't have a problem running a service like GoogleTV or at least a service like it.

kryteris4822d ago

this is the one way to eliminate (legally) jail-breaking/hacking of their console. Because it would their hardware, not ours. A pay to use said product/service. Not own. This is very smart, I'd do it at $15 a month including the live features! Would not pay anymore. Maybe 20 w/ some insurance policy. Cancel anytime, return to gamestop. Everyone could easily have the console. Not just for gaming but for many entertainment, or productivity uses.

nevin14822d ago

Man I can't wait see MSoft Xbox reveal. Based on rumors about no used games and needs online to function, just what will be their reasons for this direction?

Show all comments (55)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot14d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle14d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7714d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk7719d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
20d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster300019d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv7219d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit19d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

19d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania19d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit19d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot0719d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr19d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box19d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr19d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire9519d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv7219d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--19d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv7219d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket19d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm19d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde19d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster9219d ago (Edited 19d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
maximusprime_19d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

19d ago
BeHunted19d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

19d ago
CrashMania19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit19d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster9219d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

18d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
shadowT19d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers19d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz14919d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot0719d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)