All Channels
Popular
220°

Analysis: Has Sony already won the cloud battle?

Amid all the excitement of the PS4 announcement, Sony also made a strong case for cloud gaming. Nate Hales has some thoughts on what it means for gamers and developers alike.

Read Full Story >>
press2reset.com
GribbleGrunger4836d ago (Edited 4836d ago )

I don't think you can say they've already won the cloud battle, but what you can say is that they've put themselves in the strongest possible position. What people are overlooking is the probability of the Gaikai client being actually pre-installed on future Sony laptops, Pads, Phones and TVs. Now that's when it will be HUGE. Other companies are likely to incorporate Gaikai too, so like I said, I don't think they've won the cloud battle yet, but they're in a very strong position to make that a reality.

Just for a side note, because I like predicting trends: Sony have said that you would be able to test ANY game out and see if you want to play it. Now if ALL third parties get behind this we will probably see many games made with an incredible opening 30 minutes (assuming that's the play time for demoing games). This could go one of two ways. Devs might abuse the system and pile all their resources into that first 30 minutes just to get the sales, or they may opt to match that first 30 minutes throughout the game to avoid a major backlash. It's going to be interesting to see which companies do what.

nhales804836d ago

Interesting thought about the 30 minute opening. It is kind of the same idea as a killer demo. If companies are dead set on tricking consumers, that is a viable way to do it, there always has to be some trust.

I hadn't thought about Gaikai being on all Sony products, but the idea the Sony could license Gaikai to third parties is also interesting. It all depends on how they want to position PS4 and mores specifically the Playstation brand. Is "Playstation" a platform that exists on multiple devices and "PS4" just happens to be the first one?

MariaHelFutura4836d ago

Gaikai is doing some borderline magical work, it`s gonna be hard for anyone to match that right now.

pandaboy4836d ago

Gribble and his Pachter-esque predictions at it again.

cervantes994836d ago

Great comment and interesting take on the Gaikai demos.

If Sony can pull off everything they said they could with PS4/Gaikai integration, then this could be a wow moment in gaming.

Time will tell.

MysticStrummer4836d ago

Analysis: Is More Groundless Speculation What Gaming Needs?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4836d ago
iNathan4836d ago ShowReplies(1)
Godmars2904836d ago

Wouldn't you have to see such cloud features in action to make such a claim?

nhales804836d ago

Absolutely. This is an analysis on what Sony has promised and speculation on what it could mean if they deliver. It doesn't declare that they are the winner, just looks at the steps they are taking to position themselves at the top of the console heap. If they can't deliver that is a problem.

GalacticEmpire4836d ago (Edited 4836d ago )

We've heard absolutely nothing from MS on cloud gaming, as far as we know they don't even have it on Xbox 3.

It's most likely that they do though, or they are busy trying to build an infastructure as robust as Gaikais as quickly as possible.

Didn't they hire some guys from the failed Onlive platform? How did that compare to Gaikai?

MariaHelFutura4836d ago

Onlive had massive problems and failed (pretty badly TBH).

Capodastaro4836d ago

So did Gaikai... Why do you think Sony whipped a company which had over $700 million in investments sold for just over $300 million, which before hand Gaikai were looking for a $500m takeover.

A failure, but a bargain for Sony if it takes off how they intend it to.

Dragos754836d ago (Edited 4836d ago )

"Didn't they hire some guys from the failed Onlive platform? How did that compare to Gaikai?"

Onlive didn't fail. They just sold out just like Gaikai did. For you that don't know Onlive was worth way more than Gaikai but it sold for a cheap price. Onlive was worth over one billion but sony bought Gaikai for just over 300 million. MS doesn't need to go guy any cloud gaming company. They are capable of creating their own. They are a technology company, you know. Believe me Sony won't have the full gaikai up and running for a long time and expect to have to pay for some of the services too. Don't think you are gonna get it for free.

LessThan2Tflops4836d ago

Lets see how well it works first, remember onlive wouldn't even work over wifi at first

Show all comments (32)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
28d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted28d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8528d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele27d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk27d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay27d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 27d ago
Athlon10128d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit27d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg27d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10127d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14927d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
41d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_41d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle40d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit40d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog41d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog41d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad41d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_41d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage41d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda40d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

41d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong67d ago

looks god awful on the base systems