210°

Killzone: Shadow Fall High Resolution Screenshots

SonyRumors has gotten their hands on the official 1080p HD trailer and high resolution screen shots from the upcoming PlayStation 4 exclusive, Killzone: Shadow Fall.

Read Full Story >>
sonyrumors.net
aquamala4802d ago

welcome to 1080p gaming console gamers!

bebitech4802d ago

Yea, the fact is that with next gen consoles like the PS4, every game will be native 4K

chaos-lockheart4801d ago

Worldwide Studios boss Shuhei Yoshida said Only movies or photos can be in 4k, games are not

givemeshelter4801d ago

Not a single game will be 4k native on the PS4...If there are games native 4k, those will be last generation title arcade games.

DeadlyFire4801d ago

At 3.5-4.0 Tflops then yes. Not at 2.0 Tflops.

SnotyTheRocket4801d ago

The PS4 does 4K images and Video, not games....

bebitech4801d ago

Yea, I completely miss spoke. I meant 1080p. Currently, only select games run in 1080 but with new hardware, there is no reason that any game should be running in 720p.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4801d ago
Rhythmattic4801d ago

Umm, detecting your sarcasm.....

You could be welcomed to fantastic exclusive games in 720p (or less) on both 360 and PS3....

If its pixels that you only care about, just realise someone out there can run more than you.

Skate-AK4801d ago

And is it great to be here.

GUYwhoPLAYSvideoGAME4801d ago (Edited 4801d ago )

ps3 ran lots of games in 1080p, it will be nice to see all of them do that now though

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4801d ago
Link0794801d ago

Not a very detailed game so who knows might well be 1080p ? who cares Native 720p at 60fps with more detailed graphics is the way to go.

Cryptcuzz4801d ago

Not a very detailed game? Are you crazy? Its either you're in major denial or you simply have very unrealistic standards.

majiebeast4801d ago

His name is Link079 he probably thinks ZombieU looks as good as this.

calibann4801d ago

everything in the background is blurred out, how can you tell?

Bahpomet---4801d ago

he aint bout dat talking he aint bout dat life bitch i bend em niggers

1nsomniac4801d ago

...What does that even mean!!!??

MasterCornholio4801d ago (Edited 4801d ago )

"Not a very detailed game"

How about we play a little game? :)

I will prove to you that the PS4s best looking launch title looks much better than any of the Wii Us launch titles. And to be fair in my comparison i will use games from the same genre and will display the pics at the games native resolution plus i will only use launch titles.

Zombi U VS Killzone Shadow Fall

Zombi U is the best looking FPS on the Wii U and it runs at a native resolution of 1280x720
http://forum.beyond3d.com/s...

Screen Character Models

http://media.edge-online.co...

Screen: Enviroments

http://media.edge-online.co...

Killzone a FPS that is comfirmed to run at a native resolution of 1280x720P

Screen: Character Models

http://www.227gaming.com/wp...

Screen: Enviroment

http://images.gamersyde.com...

Well i guess your wrong Killzone Shadow Fall is a fantastic looking game while Zombiu looks like garbage in comparison. And dont justify this by saying that developers dont know how to handle Wii U hardware because Killzone Shadow Fall is also a launch title which means that the developers have very little experience with game development on that platform.

esemce4801d ago (Edited 4801d ago )

Well I think the new Killzone is very detailed and gorgeous but sadly I think they will aim for high detail and 1080p @ 30fps which is fine for SP but I for me I need multiplayer first person shooters to run at 60fps.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4801d ago
Eyesoftheraven4801d ago (Edited 4801d ago )

1920x1080p/30f is far more acceptable than 1280x720p/60f.

Except maybe in texture quality, these new Killzone graphics easily equal and in some ways surpass Crysis 3 on a Very High PC.

By the way, Crysis 3 on PC low doesn't look so different than it does on Very High such as the difference between low and high in Crysis 1 which is massive.

givemeshelter4801d ago

I am running Crysis 2 and 3 on a Crossfire based High end PC and based on that footage of Killzone and the very game I am playing, no, it does not look better.
I am not the only one saying that either. When Eurogamer did a breakdown, they said the very same thing. Put the two games side by side and you will see right away.

Eyesoftheraven4801d ago (Edited 4801d ago )

I have my own very fast PC and can play Crysis 3 maxed out with solid frame rates, it is in my opinion that the new Killzone footage looks at least as good as Crysis 3 does maxed out--even through YouTube.

SlyFamous024801d ago

This is all great and I love it but I am seeing a serious lack of Infamous: Second Son on N4G.

1nsomniac4801d ago

yea I noticed that was pretty much the only game we didn't see any gameplay footage of :(

Very interested to see it though..

DeadlyFire4801d ago

Well they actual said the cinematic was made with their in house game engine for the PS4. So that was realtime. If you compare it to UE4 Elemental sprites, and UE4 Samaritan demo Epic showed with the lighting of the police car and all it adds up really well to being built off a custom build of UE 4.

-----------------
In fact, this trailer was produced in-house using our game engine – can you tell we’re having fun with the new GPU, tools, and our new VFX system?
-----------------
http://blog.us.playstation....

madcowz644801d ago

So are we seeing 1080p with 60fps all the time?(wishful thinking) But anyway it also looks like this game has like 8x AA I don't see any jaggies. I can't wait to see more from this console.

GuyManDude4801d ago

Killzone: Shadow Fall will be running in 1080p at 30fps. It's not yet known (to my knowledge) if the footage they showed was developed for 4GB RAM or 8GB RAM. If it's 4 (which I think is likely), then their next game could very easily be 60fps.

Show all comments (34)
80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
2d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_2d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle1d 15h ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit1d 16h ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog2d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog2d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad2d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_2d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage2d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda1d 15h ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

1d 23h ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong27d ago

looks god awful on the base systems

90°

PS5 Sales Pass 92.2 Million Units, Beating Nintendo Switch 2 in the Holiday Quarter

Sony announced its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2025, alongside the traditional update on PS5 shipments.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
70d ago Replies(5)
italiangamer70d ago

Sony and Nintendo are both thriving and I'm happy, thank goodness for them or otherwise the whole gaming industry would be in shambles if they only had PC to rely on!

dveio70d ago

• Total G&NS revenue: 10.5 billion USD
• Operating profit: 900 million USD
• Hardware sales: 8M units shipped
• Software sales: 97M units
• PSN MAU: 132M

vs. Xbox:

• Total gaming revenue: 5.96 billion USD
• nothing else gets reported

__y2jb70d ago

Xbox operating costs are without a doubt eye wateringly high, way way way higher than Sony. GP is costing them an absolute fortune to operate.

Tapani69d ago

That is a very solid operating profit. It's not net, obviously, but still a very healthy amount of cash you make after cost of debt and taxes (+ other expenses), and can invest into R&D and future endeavours. And give back to your shareholders or buy back shares.

DivineHand12570d ago

It would be in Sony's beat interest to not rush next generation. Let 2029 or 2030 be the start of next generation. There is clearly plenty of demand for the PS5 and gamers are not asking for more at this time.

S2Killinit70d ago

Yup especially with the price of tech going up. They already have the PRO to hold them over.

__y2jb70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

Exactly this. Let Xbox wither on the vine for a couple more years and there will be nothing left.

fr0sty70d ago

I fully agree for 2 reasons:

1. Microsoft seems to be in a hurry to release the new Xbox, if they do at all... AMD speculates a 2027 release. This will hurt them in the long run, because:

2. Datacenters are buying up ALL the RAM, and some RAM manufacturers have stopped making RAM for consumer products entirely, while the other remaining ones are scared to ramp up their production capacity to make more RAM because they're worried this whole AI thing is a bubble that is about to pop, and they don't want to be caught holding the bag when it does pop. So, for now, it costs $300-400 for 32GB of DDR5. That's the MSRP for some entire consoles.

If Microsoft drops the new Xbox now, it's going to cost them a fortune. If Sony holds their cards a moment and lets PS5 cook for a while, as it's showing no signs whatsoever of slowing down in sales, then by the time PS6 is ready to drop, RAM prices should have stabilized, allowing Sony to devote much more of their budget towards making PS6's CPU and GPU more powerful, in addition to the tech itself maturing and the available CPU and GPU parts being much more powerful for the same price point than they would be if released today. So, we'd get a super powerful PS6 in say, 2029, that won't have to cost $700-800. They speculate, based on the current specs, that the new Xbox will cost north of $1,000, and that was before the RAM shortage came into the picture. It's definitely going to be even higher now that RAM costs so much.

MS will be shooting themselves in the foot (again) if they try to drop a new Xbox now, and Sony would be wise to capitalize on that mistake by holding their cards a while longer, raking in more of those PS5 profits, and then dropping a new console as soon as the hardware market stabilizes from this AI datacenter BS.

darthv7269d ago

7 years is a hurry...? Its the same amount of time between XBO and series. The same amount of time between PS3 to PS4 and PS4 to PS5. The 360 was 8 years between it and XBO.

If they do release first, and then Sony a year or two later... is it not possible for prices to come down in that time?

repsahj70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

I think Switch 2 beat PS5 during December 2025 that is why the gap decrease to 1m units. Because during black friday, I know PS5 sales is 2:1 against the Switch 2.

And I just want to add that the PlayStation 5 is currently 1.94 million units BEHIND the PlayStation 4 when you align launches. While Switch 2 is 10M ahead against the Switch 1 when you aligned covering it's first 7 months.

S2Killinit70d ago

I think you are forgetting to mention the chip shortages for PS5.

salis84470d ago (Edited 70d ago )

No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly.

PS5 being less than 2m behind PS4 is not a big deal; PS5 had to deal with COVID and ongoing supply and pricing struggles that clearly still exist today. Sales of software are incredibly strong, and the size of the community is bigger than its ever been.

PS5 is well on pace to exceed its early (2021) estimates of 110m by end of life even if that's 2027. PS5 will hit 100m before November and then sell another 6-8M in November + December.

PS5 is doing great, and so is Switch 2, it's good for everyone that they succeed, pitting the two against each other is more damaging than anything related to the sales of the two consoles individually.

repsahj70d ago

"No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly."

majority on this site tells otherwise.

Dexterio70d ago

@repsahj
Yup because they’ve been the anti consumer they are for so long and needs to be humbled 😆

CrashMania70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

I'd be lying if I said I didn't regret my purchase a bit. I mainly bought it for Mario Kart World, but I find it pales in comparison to 8. I'm annoyed that Nintendo charged money for a super barebones 'upgrade' to Jamboree, no new minigames? No new boards? Just some gimmicky low res camera mode. Oh and Midtroid Prime 4 let me down as well, yet to go back and finish it.

I don't want the Switch 2 to fail, it's contributing to a healthier console market with the death of xbox consoles. I'll get use out of mine long term, but some of Nintendo's decisions like the ones above just annoy me lol.

jznrpg69d ago

@respahj the only thing I want Nintendo to badly is the 80$ games so they lower the price.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 69d ago
Show all comments (37)