All Channels
Popular
330°

PS4 announcement predictions

Gaming Capacity - PlayStation 4 news has gone into overdrive with the more than likely announcement, rumours started from a trailer released by Sony, of its existence on the 20th February. With our past articles of ‘What to expect’ and more recently why it could be announced with AAA titles, what exactly could announce about the PS4 on the 20th (if it’s a PS4 announcement).

Read Full Story >>
gamingcapacity.com
Tonester9254838d ago

I soooo need to stay off of this cite tonight lol

Kevin ButIer4838d ago (Edited 4838d ago )

Lol me too, see u tomorrow at the internet meltdown

http://i.minus.com/ibv4NFbg...

Merrill4838d ago

ENOUGH ALREADY!! You're too late, nothing you can say here will be worth reading and hasn't already been said better or by 100 other redundant, boring articles from every other sites, blogs, forums etc..

Just stop....please.

FACTUAL evidence4838d ago

But they can't stop, it has something to do with Sony.

Axonometri4838d ago

I predict Sony will talk about the game consoles it has produced over the years.

Chaoslegion84838d ago

I believe the topics covered tomorrow will be gaming related. I could be wrong though. Nah!!!

riverstars864838d ago

A lot of individuals on this website are going to freak out when it is announced that PS4 will not have free online multiplayer.

Axonometri4838d ago (Edited 4838d ago )

possible but why would Sony take away the one biggest factor its online service has against ( edit )competitor? *true only live charges

@riverstars86
I agreed. Point well received either way.

riverstars864838d ago

@Axonometri
A simple concept that most persuades all companies, money!!!!

MikeMyers4838d ago

You mean competitor, not plural. Currently I think only Live charges a fee for basic online play. I don't see Sony abandoning that. What I do see is Sony further enhancing the reason gamers will want to pay with things like Plus. Gaikai could also be a game service that comes with a subscription based model and also a rental service.

MattyG4838d ago

I don't think they will charge actually. If they did, PS+ subs would dip waaaaay down. If it was like $15 a year for online, sure. But if they do $50 or $60, no one will pay $120 for PS services per year unless the console is dirt cheap.

riverstars864838d ago (Edited 4838d ago )

PS+ and paid online multiplayer will be integrated together for a $50 or $60 annual fee. Chances are if multiplayer isn't free, consumers will be forced to pay for the premium service. This is what I think Sony execs see as a way to make a lot more money.

@BitbyDeath
When the PS4 launches, what is going to persuade people to pay for PS+? There isn't going to be a lot of software for a good bit and you won't get free games for the PS4 anytime soon after the launch. I know that Home and PS+ make a good profit, but it is pennies compared to what Microsoft makes from Xbox Live.

MattyG4838d ago

Well then that wouldn't be bad at all, seeing as how PS+ isn't just multiplayer, and is actually a good deal. If they charge just for MP, I'll be pissed, but if they are integrated that's fine by me.

Axonometri4838d ago

I could see PS World or plus being multi play combined

BitbyDeath4838d ago (Edited 4838d ago )

Nah, paying to get online is not the future.
Sony already earn tons of money through both Home and PS+.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4838d ago
Show all comments (31)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
23d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted23d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8523d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele22d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk22d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay22d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 22d ago
Athlon10123d ago (Edited 23d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit22d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg22d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10122d ago (Edited 22d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14922d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
36d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_36d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle35d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit35d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog36d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog36d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad36d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_36d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage36d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda35d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

36d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong62d ago

looks god awful on the base systems