All Channels
Popular
410°

What did Sony omit from its PS3 evolution video?

Something missing from the PS3 evolution video which seems a shame, but why?

Read Full Story >>
cramgaming.com
GribbleGrunger4878d ago

At last some inspired speculation! This is good food for thought and my guess would be Sony are going to move HOME and make it browser based so that the PS3, PS4 and the Vita can access it. And of course, we can't discount any other Gaikai enabled device.

Conzul4878d ago

I think it's more likely that Gaikai and Home will be unified past any recognition.

sonic9894878d ago

i think it just needs more OS integration more like in your face user you must use this and not optional
it worked for MS ans nintendo dunno why sony arent doing yet but still ps4 holds many many possibilities

Sci0n4877d ago

Indeed that's very believable since when I last signed into PS home they made me load all my digital home belongings to there server. I actually think gaiki is already being implemented now. Also other clues are now when you check people on homes profiles it tells you they are on the PS3.

GribbleGrunger4877d ago

Very interesting! I had heard tell of a change but that's the first time someone has pointed out the differences. Yep, HOME is going to become server based. Let's hope that those loading times will become a thing of the past.

GalacticEmpire4878d ago

Although Home has been a commercial success, it was not what most gamers were expecting. So now, whenever Home is mentioned there's always a negative connotation with gamers and gamers are the people Sony are focusing on.

Hellsvacancy4878d ago

I actually forget there even is Home, ive only ever used it a handful of times, to play chess

Blackdeath_6634878d ago

LOL exactly the same. i really hope i they don't get rid of it despite the fact it didn't click with gamers i feel it has massive potential they just need to give it a new purpose as a hub of some sort to connect people or for event or something. it will be a real shame if it amounts to nothing.

Rainstorm814878d ago

If Home was built into the OS like Xbox avatars or Miis, I think it would get more use from gamers. But since your avatar can only be seen in home and the disconnect between Home and games makes it a casual haven.

If anything Home needs to be pushed more to that market since they gravitate to it the most.

zebramocha4878d ago

@hell how can you forget about home?it's under the ps store icon unless you deleted the app,it doesn't makes sense on how you could miss it.

Donnieboi4878d ago (Edited 4878d ago )

@Galactic:
It's free. So these disappointed "gamers" you mentioned need to suck it up. It's a fine distraction away from usual gaming. It's for social purposes, and for that reason, it succeeded. No one has negative connotations towards PS3 having apps like netflix, hulu, etc. So why should they be upset about Home? Home is an app for PS3 owners to enjoy, for free. "Gamers" do other things than play games. So, when I make a new friend via gaming, it's nice to be able to do something together once and a while on my gaming system, that isn't always competitive--WITH friends. Plus, did I already mention it was a FREE addition?

@Rainstorm81:
What you said is a GREAT idea. A connection to games would be a nice feature. I used it for downtime away from gaming/competition, but having some games, demo's, beta's built in would be a great way to advertise games, without forcing ads on us via PSN or PS Store (the way M$ does it). Home would be a great, optional venue to learn about new game releases. Good idea.

GalacticEmpire4878d ago

Steady on fella, I wasn't having a go at Home, I'm actually one the gamers that appreciate it for what it is just like you.

You can't really argue that it hasn't got negative connotations for a lot of gamers as they're constantly giving it an unjustified bashing in comments sections around the net.

k2d4878d ago

@Donnieboi: Yeah, imagine Sony telling their fanbase to suck it up. The ball is in Sony's court, and their obvious choices are to either let pass in silence or revitalise it.

Godmars2904878d ago (Edited 4878d ago )

They've got two days before announcing the PS4 to look back on the PS3.

Edit:
Wait, you mean *THIS* video?

smashcrashbash4878d ago

I love how people try to pretend that there isn't a Home and no one knows about it but somehow Home is never empty and there are always people in all the different worlds. People always think because them and their circle of friends ignore Home that everyone in the world does.

ThatXboxGuy4878d ago

Exactly.I hope on from time to time and every space is packed every single time.And everybody has custom outfits, accessories, pets etc.Stuff that probably takes one guy, one day to make, sold for $1 each to millions of people.

Home is a pure cash cow for Sony.

Soldierone4878d ago

Not to mention the "fee's to play" area's are constantly filled with people too. Thats people paying to play games.

All the spaces built to advertise games was also money paid to Sony to advertise the games.

If Home was really failing like people want to believe then it would be long gone by now.

GraveLord4878d ago

Home is pretty much irrelevant. It's not something to brag about.

Godchild10204878d ago (Edited 4878d ago )

Home in a way is like Miiverse, just not integrated into the PS3 as Miiverse is with the Wii U.

I only used it a few times and found it enjoyable. Its like any social network on the web, and it can only get better as time goes on. I used it during Sony's E3 conference the past 2 years.

smashcrashbash4878d ago

Irrelevant to you maybe.Not so much to people who use it. Don't assume something is irrelevant because you don't like or use it. Other people like Home just fine.If they didn't Home would always be empty and no one would be buying the stuff that they sell or playing the games. Have you ever been to Home on New Years or Christmas or Halloween.Obviously not or you wouldn't be writing such rubbish

cleverusername4878d ago

Everyone must've been playing hide and seek when I've visited then!

Rainstorm814878d ago

That's like saying the Xbox avatars are irrelevant, both rake in cash for both MS and Sony with relatively little work.

Personally I use my Xbox avatar more than Home avatar because its right on the menu for everyone to see, to this day I have yet to buy any items for home

firelogic4878d ago

Sony makes a ton of cash off of HOME. Micro-transactions fuel PSN for you so you should pray that it stays successful.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4878d ago
Show all comments (44)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
62d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted62d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8562d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele61d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla61d ago (Edited 61d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk61d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay61d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 61d ago
Athlon10162d ago (Edited 62d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit61d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg61d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10161d ago (Edited 61d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14961d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
75d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_75d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle74d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker75d ago (Edited 75d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit74d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog75d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_75d ago (Edited 75d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog75d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad75d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_75d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage75d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda74d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

75d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong101d ago

looks god awful on the base systems