All Channels
Popular
70°

NextGen Xbox720/PS4 - Why backwards compatibility is important

DLB talking about the Next gen systems and gives his reasons why backwards compatibility is so important with the next gen consoles.

Read Full Story >>
dlb-network.com
GalacticEmpire4833d ago

I disagree I think it's overrated and, although a nice bonus when implemented properly, superfluous to the reason I buy a new console.

Gamer19824833d ago

I agree its a nice bonus but if Sony use Gakai do we really want to buy our games again for backwards compatibility? As you will certainly have to! Also the new ps4 won't come with CELL so it wont support ps3 games without serious emulation.

I got a PS3 already and when PS4 drops it will be worth very little so no point in trading it in towards ps4 so therefore no point in backwards compatibility.

However if the new xbox supports it and the PS doesn't the xbox fanboys will make out like its a really important feature when its really not just like with cross gaming chat. They did when the original 360 launched and eventually people just gave up with them.

GalacticEmpire4833d ago (Edited 4833d ago )

We won't necessarily have to pay again if the PS4 can just recognise a genuine PS1/2/3 disc it could unlock the game on Gaikai, as long as the disc is in.

I agree that it will be blown massivley out of proportion if one console has it and the other doesn't.

NYC_Gamer4833d ago

It's not important to me since i'm buying the consoles to play new software

fluffydelusions4833d ago

Sony/MS + 3rd parties make too much off HD remakes to care about bc IMO.

MadLad4833d ago (Edited 4833d ago )

Microsoft really didn't have their hands in the whole HD remake craze this generation.

The only one I can think of is Halo:Anniversary, and that was them actually redoing the game in a new engine and adding some extras.

They did all right, not great, with their BC support for the 360.

I think the xbox is the one most likely to do backwards compatibility. Depends on the complications that comes with changing their primary disc format next generation.

GalacticEmpire4833d ago (Edited 4833d ago )

Only a select few xbox titles work (without a hitch) on the 360, MS didn't really support BC as much as they should have. They kind of lost interest and dropped it like they dropped the Xbox.

Gamer19824833d ago

There will be no HD remakes of ps3/360 games on ps4/720 though.. As why would people buy them? Unless the consoles have some amazing feature we cannot live without on our old games. But then would they be compatible? HD remakes worked as we got better graphics and games that wernt available anymore thats not the case this time around. We had great graphics this gen.

black9114833d ago

From a Business standpoint No. From a Consumer Standoint Yes.

MightyMatt1014833d ago

In my opinion it doesn't really matter for Microsoft but I feel like its almost a must for Sony. Something about the ridiculous collection of solid games spanning all the way back to PS1 warrants the ability for backwards comparability to be featured in the PS4

Show all comments (18)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
16d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted16d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8516d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele15d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk15d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay15d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 15d ago
Athlon10116d ago (Edited 16d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit15d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg15d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10115d ago (Edited 15d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14915d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
29d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_29d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle28d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit28d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog29d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog29d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad29d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_29d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage29d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda28d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

29d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong55d ago

looks god awful on the base systems