
Travis Bruno of Capsule Computers writes:
"Lately, whenever developers try to add something new to a popular franchise fans react with outrage and there has never been a better example of this than Dead Space 3. Over the past few months leading up to the game’s release, we’ve seen outrage over the addition of online co-op, Kinect voice work, human enemies and of course microtransaction DLC.
With all of these questionable additions added into Dead Space 3 by Visceral Games, many fans of the series have wondered if the game will still provide the same experience as before. As such, is Dead Space 3 everything fans have been hoping for or have these improvements only bogged down a great franchise?"

If EA and Motive Studio plan on remaking all the main Dead Space entries, they have to change a lot of what made Dead Space 3 so divisive.
Simple, do not bother with a Dead Space 3 remake. Rather have a new entry for Dead Space.
Remaking 3 would need to be a reworked and somewhat changed remake as 3 was flawed in most peoples eyes and the worst entry.

WTMG's Kyle Nicol:
"Was Dead Space 3 really that bad?
Well, it’s a complicated question. Dead Space 3 is undeniably the weakest of the trilogy. It’s a game that deviates so far from the original formula, that it throws a lot of what made Dead Space special in the first place out of the window. Although, where it does make up for it is one of the best cooperative shooters on the market, even after all this time. Do I recommend playing this game ten years later? Hell yes. But make sure your expectations are in the right place. It has a lot of problems that bring it down."

With the upcoming Dead Space Remake, we replay and rank the original three games.
Dead Space
Dead Space 2
The Callisto Protocol
...
...uhm...
...
...Lost Planet 3?
They need to seriously continue this ip with a new entry. Even if it's just another movie I don't care I love everything about this game.