All Channels
Popular
140°

Kotick expects 'no exception' in rising dev costs for next-gen

'In every single console transition we've seen an increase in expenditure'

Development costs will increase for studios creating games for next generation platforms, the CEO of Activision has said.

Read Full Story >>
computerandvideogames.com
NukaCola4856d ago

LoL, of course for AAA titles cost will rise. What I find funny is this douche has profited the most off a game that has ran off a modded engine from 2004. I am pretty sure the COD costs lest than the price of printing the game on DVD and this idiot wantsw to talk about costs. If Killzone 4 or Halo 5 come out, yeah then maybe it's justified at $65 or something, but unless they get a new engine and new ideas for once, then future COD games should cost no more than $40. Hell COD has some of the most expensive DLC and a $50 server app. Screw you Kotick.

guitarded774856d ago (Edited 4856d ago )

I'm not gonna defend the CoD engine, because it is time for a new one... but many of the tools we use in computer science are just refined originals. From programming languages to hardware (chip architecture). I don't know the specifics of the CoD engine, but sometimes it's better to make a piece of software better by just upgrading. But like I said, I don't know the specifics... they could be making the right decision by staying with it, they could be wrong. I hate Activision and Bobby Kotick, but unless we know the specifics of the engine, we can't really say they're doing the wrong thing from that perspective.

Oh, I didn't disagree with you... just my 2 cents on the engine thing.

LOGICWINS4856d ago

The problem doesn't lie with Kotick, it's with gamers. They're the ones who have popularized COD to the point that a $50 DLC pass is deemed acceptable. Kotick just happens to be the guy getting rich in the process.

TheGamerDood4856d ago (Edited 4856d ago )

He's already over charging for his outdated games as it is and now he wants to charge even more for supposedly next-gen games? lol Actually I was thinking just the opposite, that the cost of next-gen games should actually go down since they'll be going all digital.

The state of the COD franchise as it is, isn't all that great so I don't think he's in a position to dictate anything. The market and consumers will decide what they're willing to pay for a next-gen game and he should feel lucky to get any part of that cake.

0pie4856d ago

he want the dev cost higher so he can charge more for his activision shity games.

NastyLeftHook04856d ago

this tells me they want to keep call of duty the exact same way as its always been! OUTDATED!

majiebeast4856d ago (Edited 4856d ago )

I bet he is just saying that so he can make cod 70-80$. Its not like cod takes much to make. One guy he gets paid in 1 6 pack of beer, then he updates the textures and churns out a turd of a storyline.

LOGICWINS4856d ago

This will change very soon. People are beginning to open their eyes. It looks like Sony's coming out of the gate first this generation and IF Killzone 4 is demoed on the 20th, it's going to be a tough act to follow for any other shooter coming out in 2013.

Sorry, but Activision is a mediocre publisher. They aren't concerned with pushing boundaries, but more about making money.

dcbronco4856d ago

This is just pure greed. I knew Kotick would want to use the next generation as an excuse to try and raise prices. I don't believe it will cost more to make the games. I believe it will start to cost less.

Based on everything I've read, the hardware is getting easier. More complicated in design, but with the goal of allowing the programmer more freedom with how they use it. That didn't always seem to be the case. I've heard over and over how hard Nintendo was, each Playstation was. For all of the fanboy hate, gamers can thank Microsoft for making tools a priority. Sony and Nintendo have started to do the same.

That brings cost down. And as programmers get used to the new architectures that use HSA and program like DirectCompute and AMP C++, that trend should continue. If this is another 8 year cycle, cost will definitely go down. Which should lead to more innovation.

Kotick is just greedy corporate trash.

1nsaint4856d ago

The funny thing here is that activision spends more than 6 times as much on marketing then on development costs.

And that the development costs would rise is a given,
Most Devs are gonna have to buy new hardware and buy or create new engines

But rising the games price because of the high dev costs would be a dick move, but if there is money to be made i wouldnt be suprised if some companies will try it.

Luckily the norm is that high dev costs doesnt mean higher prices, look at GTA 4 and Red Dead Redemption which both have cost over 100 million to develop.

dcbronco4855d ago

Sure, you have to buy new development kits. But that's a normal part of the business and they would have had to do that anyway. That's the type of stuff they will write-off.

But better tools will bring their development cost down. That has been one of Microsoft's selling points to devs. This generation proved it true with the difference in cost for the 360 and the PS3.

elhebbo164856d ago

marketing, licencing and all that mumbo jumbo cost more to make than the actual game itself.

Show all comments (31)
30°

Co-founder claims Activision put "pressure" on Infinity Ward to make game about Iran invading Israel

Chance Glasco, one of the co-founders of Infinity Ward and creators of the Call of Duty franchise, has claimed that Activision once pressured the studio to include an invasion of Israel by Iran.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
50°

Kotick claims lawsuit objecting to MS-Activision deal was "tied to Embracer's desire to boost sales"

Former CEO describes lawsuit filed by Swedish pension fund as a "collateral attack" on Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
OpenGL132d ago

Yeah, the Microsoft deal has DEFINITELY worked out for everyone.

galgor132d ago

Can this mother fucker just get lost already

PRIMORDUS132d ago

He belongs in here ⚰️, hopefully sooner than later.

MrDead131d ago (Edited 131d ago )

Kotick Made $155 million from MS in the buyout, the little b*tch needs to stop whining. Thanks to this Microslop deal and massive industry consolidation thousands upon thousands of devs and other workers lost their livelihoods. This greedy piggie pervert needs shut up and f-off.

160°

Microsoft needs to listen or risk irreparable harm to Call of Duty

Windows Central: "The money may keep rolling in, but Microsoft is the custodian of one of the biggest selling video game series in history. If something doesn't change, I fear we'll reach a breaking point and irreparable damage will have been done."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
StoneTitan182d ago

Because ms is so good at managing studios, surely they will get it right

:P

franwex182d ago

In my view, they should probably merge MP with Warzone and essentially make it free to play like Halo Infinite. The campaign/zombies mode can be $30 yearly DLC. I know this would be insanity as most COD players essentially pay the full price of the game simply for the MP. However-with a shrinking player base they may have to consider it. Making it free would bring in a ton of players.

Profchaos182d ago

To late MW3 should have been a lesson but here we are two years later with a steaming pile a shite called blops7

bsingle40182d ago

Nothing lasts forever, eventually something will come along to make people forget about COD

182d ago Replies(1)
1Victor182d ago (Edited 182d ago )

@Oumba:”We’ve heard that story many times before 😂”
You know what we seen many times good franchises been run into the ground by bad management like h___o , f___a and most of the sports game oh I forgot the dynasty warriors
Oh forgot to say
Happy thanksgiving to all the N4G members
🥳 🍗 🦃

MDTunkown182d ago

Halo killer once arrived and technically call of duty killer also arrived, its name is Fortnite

dveio182d ago

Call of Duty was riding the revenue horse and charts for ~20 years. Whether undeserved or deserved.

But I endorse everyone to remind you that Microsoft could have decided differently when they took it over.

The money was certainly there, and they could have taken their time revamping the franchise:

Current-gen tech, manageable microtransactions, not imitating Fortnite and returning to core values of the franchise's origin.

They didn't.

Let's see next year. Hopefully without the then 13 years old PS4 and One hardware.

blacktiger182d ago

you need to stop saying "let see next year"

XBManiac182d ago

dveo is an alias of Phil Spencer?

XBManiac182d ago

dveio is an alias of Phil Spencer?

Show all comments (31)