All Channels
Popular
80°
5.0

MP1st - Far Cry 3 Multiplayer Review

MP1st - "If you're one of the many followers of the Far Cry series, then you'll know that it's quiet easy to get lost in such imaginative worlds that Ubisoft have created. Filled with dangers around every corner, beautiful graphics, and enjoyable gameplay, Far Cry 3 single-player is where it's all at. It's too bad the same can't be said about the multiplayer."

newflesh4885d ago

H'm, I should definetely check out Co-Op, sounds good

FrostyZipper4885d ago (Edited 4885d ago )

Thought this was for FC3 in general for a moment, then I saw the 'Multiplayer' and then it all started clicking.

Pretty pointless idea giving a review purely for multiplayer though imo. Like a certain magazine reviewing a certain multiplayer beta for a certain FPS mere hours after its release.

dazzrazz4885d ago (Edited 4885d ago )

Actually its pretty damn good to know multiplayer part is a complete pile of unplayable shit. All the websites give it high score but non of them even tried multiplayer or mentioned finding a game is just like having a good luck due to shitty uplay and ubisoft servers, nobody even cares to mention they removed vehicles from multiplayer and map editor freezes every 5 minutes...

shammgod4885d ago

Co op is cool but the rest blows

Hufandpuf4885d ago (Edited 4885d ago )

MP1st is a website dedicated to multiplayer in video games. They don't review singleplayer, just the multiplayer aspect.

Which is why it's called "Multi Player 1st".

BattleAxe4885d ago (Edited 4885d ago )

Well then they don't have too much in the way of credibility in my books after giving out a score like this. I've been playing the multiplayer on PS3, and its just as competent as Call of Duty is for the most part, and it blows Medal of Honor out of the water.

@Nitrowolf2

How exactly doesn't the multiplayer work? It works for me everytime. I will admit that I got stuck in a loading screen once and had to reboot my PS3, but other than that its been really good.

Nitrowolf24885d ago (Edited 4885d ago )

@battle
I've stated whats wrong with in the review.
Stats are keeping track, I didn't mention this but servers are constantly going down (look at ubisoft tweets for proof), the map editor has been crippled in comparison to the last title, and the balancing between weapons need sorting. The stat resets are crazy annoying.

I'm not the only one experiencing these issues. A quick jump to their forum MP feedback thread will show nearly every page with the same complaints. There's also lag that I didn't mention either.

I did mention in my review that if Ubisoft were to patch these issues it would have been a great MP title. BTW I didn't review MoH david did, and IMO that MP was trash and buggy as hell. For me Far Cry 3 MP almost feels the same, except I know it can be fixed with a few patches.

http://forums.ubi.com/showt...

there are also long lenghtly individual threads explaining what's broken about it.

Nitrowolf24885d ago (Edited 4885d ago )

we only review the MP portion of titles and it's good for those who are interested in the MP mode of the title. I did praise the co-op, seeing that it's the only thing that seems to work, but our demographic for the site are typically players who want just MP news, heck we have even tried in the past to include single-play on it and it doesn't suite well with our audience.

Plus considering that most sites out there only mentioned the MP as being a mode not to look forward to without going in depth is a bit troubling considering that they have not given any real explanation why.

Game0N4885d ago

Am i the only person who is enjoying the hell out of the multiplayer portion?

Nitrowolf24885d ago

if you can get into a game that works it's great and crazy fun, but for many (including myself) its broken in it's current state.

50°

Far Cry 3 60 FPS Trailer

The new trailer for the free 60 FPS update is here.

TriniOutsider124d ago

I'm happy with Part 3 & Blood Dragon getting the 60FPS treatment. I'll eventually try Primal, maybe this weekend.

240°

Far Cry Has Become A Shadow Of Its Former Self

Following a series of repetitive games, a formulaic approach, and a disappointing last entry, the Far Cry series has been run into the ground.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
JEECE672d ago

The trouble with most criticisms of this franchise is that they insist Far Cry 3 was the best game, but the things they claim to hate about the franchise are all the elements that 3 introduced.

Deeeeznuuuts672d ago

Couldn't agree with you more! I've always thought that, my personal favourite is two, the whole atmosphere, mystery, adrenaline, my vehicle steaming up because I've crashed too many times trying to escape and then getting in a shootout, having to pull a bullet out my arm while fire rages and bullets fly, can't beat it

JEECE672d ago

Yep, 2 is my favorite by far as well, and one of my favorite singleplayer games of all time. It was probably one of the last games Ubisoft made before they started homogenizing their franchises to be open world collect-a-thons with unnecessary RPG mechanics tacked on. I enjoyed 3 for what it was, but it was clearly an attempt to make the franchise appeal to a mass audience (which, in fairness, was successful).

LucasRuinedChildhood672d ago

That's not the issue. If Far Cry 3 never existed and they just made another 5 or 6 games that were increasingly generic copies of Far Cry 2 instead, would that make FC2 the real problem?

No. It's the lack of creativity and effort that followed that's the real issue.

And there are things that are genuinely different about FC3. Simple example - the story was easily the best. Best main villain by far too but it also has strong themes and wasn't afraid to explore controversial topics. The sequels are much blander.

Comparing the fun and creativity of Blood Dragon to the DLC in the sequels ... also says a lot about how Ubisoft fell off.

-Foxtrot672d ago

Yeah like even Far Cry 4 was decent, not as great as FC3 but they still gave us an interesting story, setting and villain. Pagan Min's random calls to Ajay were pretty funny.

They just got lazier and lazier, pumping them out while making it a little more streamlined each time. I mean Jesus, they gave us a silent protagonist with FC5 which really hurt the main story and are obsessed with pleasing everyone by trying to do two characters, male and female rather than just settling on one to tell the best story they can.

neutralgamer1992672d ago

I started FC6 and yes the game works fine but I just wssnt Fun. Do many Ubi games are huge playgrounds but feel empty and doesn't give the feeling of a world which is lived in

JEECE671d ago

I have found that the more recent FC games work better as what I call "background games." Basically what I mean is it's nice to have an active save in one of them going for those times you have 45 minutes to play games and just want to have fun and don't want to get bogged down playing a game online or starting a new game and spending all your time into an annoying tutorial. Like I haven't touched FC4 in years but I know if I had 30 minutes to an hour to play I could hop in and easily be back in the swing of things and attack an outpost and have a good time.

I think a lot of people use big RPGs like Skyrim or Cyberpunk in a similar way.

isarai672d ago

Yes because FC3 executed those aspects better. Every game since FC3 has just been Frankensteined off the bones of FC3 with half the effort.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 671d ago
Michiel1989672d ago

you could say it's a far cry from what it was

wesnytsfs672d ago

Ubisoft gets a lot of hate for their content filling of maps. Personally I enjoy the mechanic when i play an open world game I like revealing hte entire map and doing all the side mission stuff before i go into main missions. Far Cry and the RPG AC maps where a joy to play.

RaidenBlack672d ago

Far Cry 2 was soo unique ... it was ahead of its time and is often misunderstood (thank you Clint Hocking, can't wait for his next game Assassins Creed Hexe)
(yes, FC2 was a departure from from FC1, so in strictest sense, Crysis 1 & 3 are the truer successors)

JEECE672d ago

Yep. Unfortunately there has been so little since then that has scratched the same itch. Really the closest thing has been BOTW, which uses a lot of similar systems (though ironically FC2 came out before Ubisoft put the Assassin's Creed towers in Far Cry, while BOTW had Ubi towers). Obviously it isn't a shooter though. I keep hoping that that some indie dev will put an FC2-esque game out on Steam, but so far I've been left wanting.

Sircolby45672d ago

I actually enjoyed Far Cry 5 and New Dawn. Far Cry 6 was a joke. It was a step backwards in every way. That was probably the worst Far Cry I have ever played.

Show all comments (26)
80°

Why Far Cry 3 Was The Best Of The Franchise?

Far Cry 3, an open-world masterpiece that redefined the series. Gameplay and storyline makes it a timeless classic that still inspires today.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
Deeeeznuuuts705d ago

It's gotta be Far Cry 2 for me, the feeling of that game I'm still yet to find again, just everything about it, I'd kill for a remaster, I'd even be happy with just a bump in resolution and frame rate, occasionally go back to it, think I'm gunna have to do just that now 😂

porkChop705d ago

A remaster of Far Cry 2 would be amazing, especially with the mods that fixed the broken stealth system and the dumb checkpoint respawns. Include those fixes and it would be a huge upgrade over the original.

JEECE705d ago

Enemies respawn in Far Cry 2? Terrible! It's a broken system! Make me a one-man army who can inexplicably hold an entire region!

Enemies respawn in Dark Souls and Zelda? Brilliant! So much more hardcore! Glad the devs took risks!

porkChop705d ago

The problem isn't them respawning. It's that they respawned after just 5 minutes. Like you'd still be in the area looking for diamonds, loot, exploring, etc, and the enemies would just respawn with you there.