^^^ This is called denial

Except that's Forza 3. . .as in 2009's racing game of the year and the highest rated racing game of the generation, not Forza Horizon. I doubt Microsoft is still bundling those.
Come on bro, you should know. . .how to READ.

Yes, but people buy those bundles 'because' they have Forza ... it cuts both ways. Forza is doing well, so how about we just acknowledge that? It's only the same as the Uncharted bundles or the Infamous bundles. I'm Sony all the way but be fair.

So you reckon PASBR is alot higher? Because I've yet to see it in any top 20 charts since it's second week out. Even if VGCHARTZ were off, a 5 week old exclusive game being outsold this badly by a 2011 game (UC 3) is pretty disappointing no matter how you spin it. No?

You never, ever quote these numbers. because VGchartz admitted that these are just estimates. There numbers are way off base until it comes time for the official number to come out. Then that when they adjust their numbers to make it seems as if they're estimates were accurate the entire time. When European analyst firms can't even track EU/PAL territories, I doubt some two-bit, ex-neogaffer hosted site can.

@niceguy360

be kind and show me one comment where i said any thing about PASBR ??!!
i don't even own it
i'm talking about vgchartes ...not this game

******"Even if VGCHARTZ were off, a 5 week old exclusive game being outsold this badly by a 2011 game (UC 3) is pretty disappointing no matter how you spin it. No? "******

it's not "even if"
vgchartes numbers are always off
look for my comment history
even when they show ps3 numbers are higher
i still bash them and call them wrong
i only trust the numbers from Sony and MS
and you would be out of your mind if you even trust vgchartes
so tell me how do you use the top 20 chart when this chart numbers are not even real ??!!!
vgchartes numbers are not real ...so what your source ??!!!
i'm getting disagrees for stating the truth and something every one knows outside of this site
"vgchartes numbers are not real"

agree somewhat. not sure what Sony were thinking when they came up with this, from the moment it was announced I saw low sales written all over it. I don't think it sucked but was more "meh"

instead of funding this game they could've just put all that money into potentially buying back the rights for Crash Bandicoot / Spyro because that's what we want.

we never asked for this.

oh...you guys who haven't even touch the game!

it's a pretty good game and it's very well executed! the online works since day 1 and no lag even playing between PS3 and Vita! and the fact that it comes with the Vita version for FREE is a huge bonus and me and my brother are having a blast playing team online while he is on PS3 and me on Vita!

it may not be selling too well as it's a niche type of game and fighting games aren't as big as they used to be anymore! aside from big name like SF, Tekken and very few others, no fighting games has done too well this gen! that's just fact but it doesn't derive anything from the game as personally, I think it's awesome!

Played this game for a couple hours, besides noticing the terrible net code... I realized this game just doesn't have the fun factor that brawl did. It's a shameless rip off that doesn't have that super close hardcore gamer attention to detail that the smash bros series had.

The buttthurt is strong with you.

The word decimate comes from the Latin word decem which means ten. Black ops is not selling ten times as many copies on 360. So your statement is false.

Hah... The more you know. Then I will take back the word 'decimate' and replace it with 'thrashing'.