All Channels
Popular
460°

Sony patents DualShock/Move controller

Sony has patented a new controller that is a hybrid of the DualShock and Move controls.

Read Full Story >>
arabicgamers.com
Snookies124935d ago

The Move itself might be alright, but the button layout on it was HORRIBLE. Oh dear god, when I tried using one, I just put it down after about five minutes and walked away.

Akuma-4935d ago

awesome idea. i know the final product will look amazing and be comfortable to hold.

i love the move controller in killzone 3 , resistance 3 and a few other games. i once hated the ps move and thought it was rubbish. i bought the move and nav-con and thought after using it for two hours that it was a waste. i started to use it again and decided to try to get through all of the killzone 3 campaign on normal. i started liking it after a few configuration to the sensitivity and loved it about a quarter way through killzone 3. the button layout is good and i haven't a problem with the placement.

i wish more games had move support. its very accurate and i think its amazing. it would be nice to have one controller that can also be used as a move and nav con. i dont want ps4 to have 3 different controller like the wii u. i hope this is for ps4 instead of ps3

Gazondaily4935d ago

I think that controller is a brilliant idea. If this turns out to be true, let's hope Sony's approach to this controller isn't half-arsed as the current Move.

torchic4935d ago (Edited 4935d ago )

@akuma

I don't understand how your comment is in any way related to Snookies12's comment.

Eyeco4935d ago (Edited 4935d ago )

Really , In some games i found move to be incredibly accurate, better than Wii motion plus, however in some games i found it to be pretty much broken, rendering some games almost unplayable.

The way i've seen it motion control depends on how well the developer uses it e.g, Red Steel was half assed, Metroid Prime 3 was phenomenal
This idea sounds incredible however, I wonder how it will look.

bigfish4935d ago

what??? the two balls at the top will get in the way of the index figure natural resting positions and where the trigger buttons would be,, how is this going to be comfortable to hold!

ChickeyCantor4934d ago

" awesome idea. i know the final product will look amazing and be comfortable to hold."

Gah...like...F this Imma go to bed.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4934d ago
WeAreLegion4935d ago

Oh, shut up and use it again. The button layout on Move is fine.

Snookies124935d ago

That's really friendly, telling me to shut up. I'm just simply saying why didn't they just map the same controls a normal Dualshock has to the Move? Would it really have been that hard?

WeAreLegion4935d ago

Yes, it would have been, given the Move's shape.

As far as the shut up thing goes, it's not exactly like me actually telling you to shut up. It's more of a dealwithit.jpg thing. Ya know?

GribbleGrunger4935d ago

Looks like a reworking of a really old patent they had about 4 - 5 years ago. It would make sense to package both experiences in with one controller.

No FanS Land4935d ago

yeah I remember sony's break apart motion controller.

himdeel4935d ago

Yeah I remember a video of the breakapart ds. The guy doing the demo was showing how you could simulate climbing up a ladder with it.

Conzul4934d ago (Edited 4934d ago )

[deleted]

LordZ4935d ago

OMG, that controller has some balls.

Braid4935d ago

Two, to be exact.

I'd take the regular controller over this though, if it's going to be a separate product that's fine, but I wouldn't want my PS4/PS3 to be packaged with one of these by default. Not everyone's interested in motion gaming.

Jinkies4935d ago

If this is the controler for the PS4, the main official controler then I'll wait for a classic one

I DON'T want to pay for crap that I'm not going to like while playing games, keep this stuff seperate.

NegativeCreepWA4935d ago (Edited 4935d ago )

I just want an option for a wand with a joystick, so left handed people can play games that involve walking comfortability.

nerdkiller4934d ago

please sony just stick to making a more powerful console and leave the innovation to nintendo.
i cant believe some ppl think this controler looks cool, you dont have to like everything your favorite company makes

FanboyPunisher4934d ago

Shit is a gimmic, more processing time on controls and movememt = delay.

This isnt for anything competitive, pure gimmick.
When they design a controller that has better response time than what we have already, then it'll be a viable option.

Waste of $$$

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4934d ago
-Mika-4935d ago

Um... ya, I don't know sony.

DragonKnight4935d ago

Then you're both on equal footing as Sony doesn't know you either.

SonyStyled4935d ago

probably the Duelshock 4, aka PS4 controller

WeAreLegion4935d ago

Sometimes, Miyamoto creates patents under Sony's name, just to screw with them.

Right?

RIGHT?!?

LOL_WUT4935d ago

That looks ugly with the two spheres on the top.

Show all comments (80)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
39d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted39d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8538d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele38d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk38d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay38d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 38d ago
Athlon10139d ago (Edited 39d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit38d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg38d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10138d ago (Edited 38d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14938d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
52d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_52d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle51d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit51d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog52d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog51d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad52d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_51d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage51d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda51d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

51d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong77d ago

looks god awful on the base systems