All Channels
Popular
210°

Why the Wii U Doesn't Get It

With the recent release of Nintendo’s Wii U, much has been made of the company’s continued disinterest in the importance of graphics, even this late in the game. The Wii U, while not a particularly underpowered machine, is not a forward-thinking device. Nintendo, perfectly satisfied with releasing dated technology that is supposedly comparable to the aging Xbox 360 and PS3, continuously writes off the fact that graphics matter to gamers. Whether you’re a retro gamer or someone who obsesses over plant tesselation, graphics are an important component of video games that shouldn’t be ignored.

Read Full Story >>
safetys-off.com
tehpees34911d ago

The irony behind this article is Nintendo used to make some of the most graphically advanced systems.

MegaLagann4911d ago

Shh, no one remembers the SNES, N64 and Gamecube.

fossilfern4911d ago

THANK YOU! I have been saying this for a while! People have forgotten how powerful the SNES, N64 and GC were.

Moncole4911d ago

Many people started gaming this gen and think Nintendo always made weak systems because of the Wii.

Yi-Long4911d ago

... both in terms of 1st party games as well as 3rd party game.

The problem started ofcourse with the N64 and continued with the Cube and Wii, in that there just wasnt enough quality 3rd party support across all the 'core' genres, so many of these systems lacked a nice library of serious race games, sports games, shooters, etc etc.

Not sure what to make of the WiiU. I had high hopes when Nintendo announced they were aiming to please both the core as well as the casula gamers, but so far I don't feel they delivered on that promise, and most of the recent news has been disappointing, from launch-games being disappointing, to 5GB updates, to system-locked accounts, etc etc.

Not in a hurry to pick it up. I doubt I'll ever will, which is a real shame, cause I'm sure it will have some quality releases.

bothebo4911d ago

Maybe you have forgotten that Nintendo completely changed their marketing and development strategy?

guitarded774911d ago

I picked mine up yesterday with about 20 other buyers in line. The interesting thing was all buyers were mid 20's - early 40's core gamers. I think most core gamers own every piece of hardware they can afford, and understand it's all about the gameplay experiences. I'm a computer scientist (glamorous title I know), but I could give two poops about specs... I'm concerned with games. All that said, I do have a few "not likes" about the Wii U after spending 12 straight hours with it yesterday, but the "likes" far outweigh them.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4911d ago
Godmars2904911d ago

They made 8 and 16 bit systems. That is all. That is all there needed to be really.

KenAdamsNSA4911d ago

And all of them weren't used to their potential by anyone but Nintendo. That's not their fault necessarily, but it speaks volumes about their timing and the way they view the industry.

DrVosknocker4911d ago

Wrong...Actually Rare did, and they always beat Nintendo on technical prowess (although Yoshi's Island was pretty sweet). BTW, I used to be a Nintendo fan, til Wii and Wii U...

DrVosknocker4911d ago

The Disagrees are from young or uninformed gamers...donn't forget NES..also for all the disagrees. Go watch old Nintendo ads! They're catch phrase was Nintendo Power! and they always talked about their power.

jmc88884911d ago

"Now you're playing with POWWWWEEERR!!!!"

eagle214911d ago

The sad part about these noob gamers is they don't understand why Nintendo sells so much. They think of Wii Fit and not Link To the Past. pfffft!!!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4911d ago
NYC_Gamer4911d ago

Wii-U is only for those who enjoy Nintendo first party software..

Venoxn4g4911d ago

I'll just enjoy all good software :)

Deku-Johnny4911d ago (Edited 4911d ago )

Wii U is for those who enjoy everything gaming has to offer instead of just 'core' titles.

KenAdamsNSA4911d ago

I thought the Wii U was Nintendo's attempt to appeal to those very "core" gamers?

4911d ago
Trago13374911d ago

i usually don't care for console graphics, because i already have a PC, but do Nintendo's art styles REALLY need bleeding edge tech? i mean, sure, third party devs are potentially screwed, but nintendo games end up looking amazing. Look at the Mario galaxy games.

the way i see it, if you only plan on owning a Wii U next gen, may God bless your soul, but if you're really getting hung up on graphics, then get a PC, you'll have the best graphics ALWAYS.

it's like console gamers care about graphics, but don't care at the same time. if you're gonna have all the systems, or at least two systems next gen, and you know you're not getting multiplats on the Wii U when the others come out, why do you care in the first place?

i'd like to know please.

Venoxn4g4911d ago (Edited 4911d ago )

my next gen will be with PC & Wii U and maybe PS4 if the games will be good on it.. but Wii U & PC in the first place

I'm not a graphics maniac, thats good.. I always laugh when I see comments, that on x console are better shaders, on y console better shadows.. but mostly game looks the same on each.. for me Wii U graphics will be enough, for me actually PS2 graphics level is alright, I even love retro games.. but mostly I am a console gamer, not PC, but I love indie games on PC :) I hope I answered your question.. or maybe not :D cheers :)

btw Nintendo games..yea, for me even there are better looking games on Wii than on HD consoles, they are soo colorful, art style, music and everything else.. I hope Wii U will get lots of exclusives from 1st, 2nd & 3rd parties great games.. plus I wish luck to Sony (not Microsoft) :D

Trago13374911d ago (Edited 4911d ago )

yeah, i plan on owning all the systems next gen. i'll get the majority of my multiplats on PC, not unless there's exclusive content on one of the console version, like AC3. I'll have all the exclusive games on each of the consoles, it's a win win situation.

and yeah, even if you don't game on PC, most people who visit this site will own multiple consoles, so it's still a win win situation. even if the Wii U had better tech in it than it does now, i STILL wouldn't care, i rarely buy multiplats on nintendo platforms anyhow.

Venoxn4g4909d ago

edit to my comment :)

I wish luck to PC, console and handhelds, but not to smartphone gaming, because it is killing proper gaming

dark-hollow4911d ago (Edited 4911d ago )

Nintendo cannot afford to get into a pissing fight with giants like Microsoft and Sony.

Gaming is their bread and butter and if they sold a mega powerful expensive console at a loss and nobody bought it they are in deep shit. Not like Sony or ms who can rely on their other departments to ease the loss and push the console till it breaks even.

They know what they are doing and they know people buy their systems for their exclusives. There is a reason why they still in the hardware business for more than anyone else while Atari and Sega failed miserably.

Captain Qwark 94911d ago (Edited 4911d ago )

well to be fair at the moment sony cant even afford to piss in a bathroom because they can barely afford the rent and yet they are making it work

Kalowest4911d ago

@dark-hollow

Captain Qwark 9 is right about Sony. Nintendo is worth more than them right now. If Apple or MS felt like buying out Sony they could sadly.

KenAdamsNSA4911d ago

I don't think Nintendo is in as bad a financial crisis as you think... :/

Deku-Johnny4911d ago

All of Sony's departments are in big trouble, if their gaming department goes down they can't rely on other departments in fact even if Sony's gaming department is successful next gen there probably won't be a PS5/6. Nintendo could afford to make huge losses for the next few generations and still be able to make consoles.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4911d ago
Show all comments (51)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7730d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer55d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi54d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer55d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot55d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno55d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay55d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno53d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK53d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)