All Channels
Popular
790°

Sony PS4 dilemma with PS3 game discs doubt

With details slipping out frequently on Microsoft’s Xbox 720 console, there has been a complete opposite of details for the elusive Sony PS4. We all know it is coming, but Sony and industry sources have remained tight-lipped on what kind of specifications and features we can expect to see when it releases. PS4 backwards compatibility however, may not be one of them.

Read Full Story >>
product-reviews.net
Zodiac4936d ago

Just keep your ps3. BC is nice for some, but i prefer to play games on their respected platform.

All ps2 gaming this gen was done on a ps2.

Ps1, N64 had to be digital because i'm not paying 500 dollars for zelda or whatever.

Played GC games on a GC this gen, Xbox games on an Xbox.

You get the idea.

Abash4936d ago

I am honestly sick of hearing about PS4 rumors and the same rumors being picked apart. Wait for the console to be announced, geez

animegamingnerd4936d ago

yeah same here to me the next xbox and playstation doesn't exist in my mind until they are announced

RioKing4936d ago

Because you guys want more secrecy (less info) for more SURPRISE! during the official E3 unveiling. At least that's how it is for me :D

360ICE4936d ago

It's their profession. You might as well not read the article.

morganfell4935d ago

No details are slipping out but backwards compatibility may be a problem...

Not even waiting, are they.

SolidStoner4935d ago

If PC can handle ps2 games than I cant see any reason for ps4 to be worse... what I really hope is that next gen console will be closer to PC, with all console priorities! that would be great for us gamers AND developers! Same goes for ps3 bluray games, if ps4 have bluray player I just dont understand why would they didnt work, since this is no alien tehnology....

AAACE54935d ago (Edited 4935d ago )

The thing i dont get is, how can it be so hard to play ps3 ga
mes on a ps4? I mean essentially it will be a more powerful ps3 becase it will probably still use bluray.

Btw... i dont plan on being an early adopter for either system. Usually the games arent that great but we make ourselves believe they are to justify the reason for upgrading.

My ps3 and 360 work fine... ill wait!

MikeMyers4935d ago (Edited 4935d ago )

@Abash
If you're sick of hearing rumors for the PS4 then why read them?

What I find rather ironic about this article (if true) is how Sony went from being a pioneer of bringing BC to game consoles and really benefiting from this feature, to now almost shying away from it and instead try and get consumers to buy the same game over again (remastered or original). Not everyone wants multiple systems lying around, which is why it was a popular feature to begin with. Another issue may arise if the next Xbox comes with this feature out of the box much like the Wii U and Sony being left isolated. It's not a huge selling feature but it's one nonetheless.

As for 4K resolution I just don't see that happening. I don't think Sony will once again use the Playstation brand to propel a new format and be the leader in the next phase. One would have to consider how much space would be required for 4K on a bluray disc for example. They may offer a streaming service later on down the road but I don't see it being applied for gaming.

The PS4 will be about providing the best value at a reasonable cost. Supporting 4K is just too early and they definitely don't want to be bringing out a new format that eclipses bluray. I think they will stick with bluray but have much faster drive speeds. Along with a much needed ramp up in the amount of ram being allocated.

pixelsword4935d ago

"Sony and industry sources have remained tight-lipped on what kind of specifications and features we can expect to see when it releases. PS4 backwards compatibility however, may not be one of them."

I was for talking about the PS4, until I was against it.

Quit the double-talk: until you know about something, you don't.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4935d ago
Amazingmrbrock4936d ago

That would be the nicest way to go about it but some people fund the purchase of their new console partly by selling the old one. 400+ isn't usually just kicking around in my bank account waiting for me to spend it. I usually have to scrimp and save for a few months, so being able to sell off my ps3 for 150 or so to get the shiny new ps4 is usually a great boon.

Beastforlifenoob4935d ago

TIP; Try to sell just before its announced you will get ALOT more money since once its announced alot of people will sell there PS3, so the supply will increase, yet the demand will decrekase... But then you are left with no console for some time.

kreate4935d ago

@beast

Hey sorry for being a retard but I would like to ask when the ps4 will be announced. So I can sell my ps3 just before ps4 is announced.

bangshi4935d ago

Save for a bit longer then.

You don't have to have it immediately. And if you want the PS4 to play your PS3 games, you're clearly content playing those older games - so why the rush to immediately buy the new console at the highest price it will ever be?

I find the argument of trading in the old console to save money on the new one a flawed case.

Dasteru4936d ago

N64 games aren't $500 lol.

Ocarina of time is worth $40 used
Majora's mask is $50

Zodiac4936d ago

I'm not into the idea of buying used cartridge games from 15 years ago.

If i was going to buy n64 or earlier, then i would like it new, but that is almost impossible for the games worth playing.

No fun buying used retro games.

konnerbllb4936d ago

Ocarina of time is less than two dollars right now on Ebay.

Dasteru4935d ago

@konnerbllb:

I think you need to learn how Ebay works.

Those are bids not buyouts.

The retro game list price for OOT is $40 for a grey cart and $50 for gold (used, No box)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4935d ago
Pillsbury14936d ago

Someone with common sense, I still break out my ps2 and ps1 when I want to play classics.

DeadlyFire4935d ago

I don't see how its sooooooo difficult. Sure you can't emulate it. Just put PS3 kit inside of PS4. Easy as pie. PS3 CPU+GPU all that are really necessary right?

Mr Tretton4935d ago

If PS4 isn't BC to PS3 discs, it's because there is more money to be made in selling new digital copies on PSN then giving people BC. Simple as that.

A PC can emulate any console pre-current gen, that has ever existed. Emulators made by hobbyists. So how is a multi million dollar company not 'able' to emulate a previous console on the next? No money in it. Only a small number of people pass on a console due to no BC.

extermin8or4935d ago (Edited 4935d ago )

well I for one would quite like backwards compatibility, the way the rumours are working etc i expect we'll see a similar announcement time as vita had last year so a playstation meeting event in london or new york or maybe even Tokyo or somewhere like that in feb/march with a planned launch in approximately a years time (the vita was expected to launch worldwide before last xmas the earthquake/tsunami slowed production and that wasn't possible) and as I'll be at uni (but still fully intend to get one :P I should probably start saving soon actually) I would love backwards compatibility just so I can still play the games I've kept and not sold when bored of, so mainly the ps3 exclusives and arkham city etc plus that will save me needing to buy new games. Also if the ps4 is announced soonish and has no B/C with ps3 games I'm going to find it a real struggle to justify purchasing say The Last of Us or GTA5 so close to them being superseded; yeah my ps3 will still be at home and they can be played on there but.... It does at least need to be able to play PSN/PS£ games off psn really and the ps1 and ps2 psn games for certain- after all people will be annoyed if digital stuff also becomes redundant on the new console especially seeing as it tends to carry a higher price than retail and that could harm their digital ambitions for the next generation of consoles really with people reluctant to buy digitally earing loosing it all again come the start of the gen after next :O

SkyGamer4935d ago

There are a few problems with bc on ps4. First let's take into consideration of the CPU. The Cell and amd a8 or a10 will be different architecture. Then with memory. The ps3 uses only 256 but of high speed memory so that developers use their memory different, that will be an issue if they have more, obviously but not as fast, probable. Then on to the video card. Will nVidia charge sony royalties and manufacturing for their 7800gtx? Much like they did with Microsoft and the Xbox? So there are three major points for bc becoming a BIG deal in the ps4. Like the above poster states, just keep your ps3. I still have a launch date ps3 60 gb model with firmware right before the loss of other os.

bangshi4935d ago

This.

I didn't hear people moaning that their CD walkman didn't play their old cassette tapes or that their DVD player wasn't playing their VHS tapes.

People are just WANT WANT WANT, NOW NOW NOW.

If you can't afford it without trading in your old console, save a little more.

Simple as.

Vortex3D4935d ago

If you still have the launch PS3 console, you can play PS1, PS2 and PS3 and then PS4 console for PS4 games.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4935d ago
Lucreto4936d ago

I don't believe a word of it.

The developer in question so far have made one game for the PS3. Even that is a PSN game.

andibandit4936d ago

Which developer, the article seemed to keep it anonymous?.

Lucreto4935d ago

I went back to the interview the developer is from Clever Beans and they made When Vikings attack.

extermin8or4935d ago

I believe it; look at the spot on vita rumours they came from the same kind of developers as these are coming from; if the small devs are making sony exclusive games timed or permanently they are likely to share new tech info with them to work on stuff for launch so it has a variety of launch titles both online and off.....

BitbyDeath4936d ago

Guess these guys missed the flood of PS4 rumours that have been ongoing for quite some time.

moodgamer4936d ago

If i buy a new Playstation or Xbox i will not care about this dilemma. If i have a Ps3 i play my PS3 games on hit. Like a still play some PS2 games on the PS2. Its cool to have backwards comptibility but its not the purpose of a new console to play different and new games? That's why its a new console.

The Great Melon4936d ago (Edited 4936d ago )

New and different games games don't necessarily mean recently released. I only played the original Metal Gear Solid this generation on my 60 GB PS3. I didn't own PlayStation, so was very happy to enjoy older games that I missed out on when I was narrow-mind Nintendo fanboy as a kid.

As I witness more and more console generations, I have a growing appreciation of PC gaming. Practically every game released in my lifetime can still be played on my current computer. Media may cause some slight issues, but its nice to now I can still play something like Starcraft which came out over 15 years ago.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4936d ago (Edited 4936d ago )

also hd remakes are more than just hd..
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Even if my pc is not the most high end like the opion to have the new tech at any time.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
you might want to watch that in HD.
and then there is steam.

on topic:
but I really want to see sony return to there glory days. Seeing ps3 surpass 360 after selling 70 million+ and the fact that 360 had a year start? lol yeah ps brand is still strong.

Also I think gaikai will be used some how for old games.

ConstipatedGorilla4935d ago

@ShutUp

"but I really want to see sony return to there glory days. Seeing ps3 surpass 360 after selling 70 million+ and the fact that 360 had a year start? lol yeah ps brand is still strong."

Why is this so important to you? Do you own Sony stock?

Muerte24944935d ago (Edited 4935d ago )

early adopter kind of pays off. I bought a refurbished 60gig ps3 in 2007. It still works til this very day and I also keep my BC because at that time, EmotionEngine was built in. My theory is this, unless they have a incredible launch line up like WiiU (re-releases) then BC is a must. You want to wait until your library is substantial enough before removing it (i.e xbox360-ps3). It may not remain that way for the entire gen, but I can see being there at launch.

urwifeminder4936d ago

In the very least i hope the next xbox is backwards compatable im sure it will as it will use similar tech.

RioKing4936d ago

Screw the next Xbox... this is a Playstation article, boy!

bozebo4935d ago

"it will use similar tech."
you are talking total tripe.

etownone4935d ago

Yeah, I really hope it is.

Show all comments (111)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
28d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted28d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8528d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele27d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk27d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay27d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 27d ago
Athlon10128d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit27d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg27d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10127d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14927d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
41d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_41d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle40d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit40d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog41d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog41d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad41d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_41d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage41d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda40d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

41d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong67d ago

looks god awful on the base systems