All Channels
Popular
110°

System Sellers - Fact or fiction?

Games Fiends follows up yesterdays open discussion about system sellers with todays article on the subject.

They say:

"“System seller”. It’s a phrase we’ve all heard. It’s a phrase I’ve used scores of time when writing about new consoles. System Seller is often bandied about during the lead up to a consoles release or in the following months after until said console is deemed to be established. But what exactly are we talking about? Is there such a mythical beastie and if so how does one quantify one? Also, should we really care?"

Read Full Story >>
gamesfiends.com
DivineAssault 4956d ago

I miss pack in system sellers w consoles.. These days its rare for a system seller to launch with a console let alone a pack in..When i have to cough up extra money for a good game, it starts to get really expensive..

Vita set me back around $400 for the system, a decent memory card, & a game.. Wii U will eventually set me back around $500 the day i get it having to buy the console, HDD, a game, a headset, & a pro controller.. Same goes for when Orbis drops & that sh*t hurts.. Even worse if there arent any system sellers to buy & having to settle for something that isnt exclusive or thats mediocre.. I remember geting a N64 & not having enough money for a game (only 2 to choose from at launch lol) but when i got mario 64, it was pure bliss

admiralvic4956d ago

I honestly don't see whats to debate here. With the exception of the PS3 (which was at the time the cheapest / one of the cheapest bluray players), you would be a complete moron to buy a system just in hopes down the road good games would come. I mean, look at the 3DS. Pokemon is certainly a system seller, but it's already got a huge price drop without a new Pokemon releasing for the 3DS. Realistically, I would feel stupid if I didn't wait for the game I wanted to come out. Hence why the concept exists in the first place.

tweet754956d ago (Edited 4956d ago )

all the way back to the NES days without a doubt the system would not have been as huge as it was without super mario brothers. Super mario was the system seller That opened the window for zelda metroid etc in the next few years. With out super mario the system might have been dead before those franchises came to be .

jmc88884955d ago (Edited 4955d ago )

I know, it's funny he didn't mention Super Mario Bros.

It's stupid he said, Wii Sports was a fluke. Ummm...did it get people to buy the system? Yeah.

But he also errors in his logic that, there can only be one, and that everyone has to agree it's the same one.

The thing is, for each console, whether it's a packed in game, whether it's at launch or later, it's irrelevant, each person can view a game as a system seller.

You see it all the time, oh I'll wait until Zelda comes out someone says....well then....Zelda to HIM is THE system seller. Or Halo 3. Whatever it is, I've read hundreds of people's messages over the years where people say when X game comes out, that's when they'll buy.

So the whole premise of the article is flawed to the extreme.

Whatever game gets you to buy the system, is a system seller to you. It's not like everybody that buys a system, buys it at launch.

Those that did usually buy it, because either a game packed in or a game they could buy with it, got them to buy it.

So the author created a false, limited premise, recreated the universe to fit his viewpoint, and then deduced he was correct.

TheDivine4956d ago

Hell yea it exists. I bought (my parents bought) a n64 after playing Mario 64 in Toys R Us. I got a ps2 after seeing Gta3. Got a gamecube after seeing Metroid Prime/Wind Waker. Got a 360 after seeing Gears and Bioshock. Got a ps3 for Mgs4 and Demons Souls. Got a wii again for Xenoblade and The Last Story. Got a 3ds for RE Revelations. Got a Vita for Uncharted. Got a psp for Crisis Core and Portable Ops. Il get a Wii-u for whatever amazing game it gets. Most likely Metroid, Bayonetta 2, or a new Mistwalker or Xeno game. Im the type to say F it and grab a system for one game if its good enough. Every system winds up having at least 4 to 5 must play games. I might wait till its cheaper but il def get it eventually.

moosehound4956d ago

But you, like me, are in the minority here I think. Most "Joe public" consumers will not be straight on to a system for launch. :)

You kind of summarise the point of the article in the last part of your post "Every system winds up having at least 4 to 5 must play games. I might wait till its cheaper but il def get it eventually."

At some point the build-up of great games, mixed with a lowering price point makes a sale to the larger buying public :)

70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio32d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing32d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9232d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit32d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing32d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9232d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay33d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn234d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn233d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown34d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay33d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay33d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac33d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger34d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300034d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde34d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde33d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7535d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_33d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.