All Channels
Popular
230°

PlayStation 4 should have a subscription based pricing model

It has recently been revealed that Microsoft is widening its offer with retailers to allow customers to buy an Xbox 360 with a two-year service contract. The contract consists of users paying a reduced upfront cost for the 360, $99 and they must subscribe to two years of Xbox live service for $14.99 a month. While many people may be against the subscription based pricing model, it is done all the time in the phone industry. Most people don’t buy new iPhone until their contract is up. If people had to pay the upfront cost on their iPhone like they did with the PS3 at launch, than the iPhone might not be the runaway success it is today. I really think the subscription based pricing model could benefit Sony moving forward, in particular, with the launch of the PlayStation 4.

Read Full Story >>
sony-gamer.com
Godmars2904951d ago

For game discounts and movie rentals, separate Gamefly and Netflix-like subscriptions - one more for music? - which could be combined for one-umbrella discount, but not internet services and game related features. At this point MS should back away from that for XBL since they're targeting non-gamers as they push their gaming/media system.

Or is that media/gaming system?

WrAiTh Sp3cTr34951d ago (Edited 4951d ago )

Sony has already mentioned that they are somewhat interested and they're waiting to see how it does for MS before doing anything like this. And this article is practically agreeing with my sentiments from the article linked here... http://n4g.com/news/1106998...

CraigandDayDay4951d ago (Edited 4951d ago )

I would much rather buy the PS4 outright and not have to pay some sort of cell phone-esque monthly payment for it. However, I can see at least some people who would be interested in this. Could be a cool way to draw in more gamers. Offer the system for "free" or for $99 and make small payments each month for a couple years to pay the rest of it off. Makes sense for some people. I'll be buying it outright, though.

BTW, that is a pretty cool looking PS4 mock-up. Can't wait to see what the PS4 looks like and what it can do (visuals and features).

Knight_Crawler4951d ago

But what if you could not afford $600 all at once and you really want to play Killzone 4 or Uncharted 4?

CraigandDayDay4951d ago (Edited 4951d ago )

Then I suppose you could do this deal, but I for one would rather wait and buy it straight out.

Bobertt4951d ago

You can already do that just depends where you buy it. If you have a best buy card you can pay something off over 6 months. For $600 system thats $100 a month.

DigitalRaptor4951d ago

@ Knight_Crawler

PS4 will not be $600, you can be sure of that.

Lvl_up_gamer4950d ago

I have enough money to buy a console outright. I plan on buying the PS4 outright and the 720 outright.

However, not everyone who is a fan of gaming can afford that. Aside from kids who have to depend on their parents to buy them consoles or have to pay half, even some adults just don't make a lot of money are cautious on what they purchase.

These types of offers are a great thing. Simply because it offers another option. Options are good for everyone, even the companies that are offering them.

Sure in the long run the consumer is paying more...but they are playing sooner rather then later.

I know that if I was tight on money and I wanted to be father of the year for my kid/kids, I would greatly consider these types of deals. Initial cost for the console is only $99 instead of $300-$400 and then I only have to pay around $15 a month for 2 years? That is a cost which is very feasible.

I like that corporations offer choices and options, would consumers really NOT want options?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4950d ago
ABizzel14951d ago

A subscription model for the PS4 would allow the console to be sold for $600+ if that's the amount of tech they put into it, over 2 years.

$300 + 24 month subscription to PS+ to cover the price of the PS4.

PirateThom4951d ago

Let me refute this by saying "no, it shouldn't". It's a ridiculous idea when Microsoft do it and it's a ridiculous idea if Sony do it. Fact is, it's just another way to limit what you can do with the hardware, by tying you to it for x amount of time.

FXGAMESKILLEEN4951d ago

While I agree that gamers may be tied to their system longer its just an option and the old pricing model could still be used in conjunction for those that want to sell second hand

GribbleGrunger4951d ago (Edited 4951d ago )

While I agree with you, PirateThom, something tells me this is on the cards for Sony. Gaikai is almost certainly going to be used in this way. I don't think it will be ONLY subscription based though. They'll sell the console as normal too, if you want.

Ducky4951d ago (Edited 4951d ago )

A future where you don't own your games nor your console.

Moneysuits must be creaming themselves at the mere though.

Anon19744950d ago (Edited 4950d ago )

I've got no issue with this at all. As the article mentioned, people do it all the time with cell phone contracts (I know I do). Offering subscription based programs for new consoles is just offering more consumer choice and I have no problem with that.

The issue I have is how much extra is charged over what it would cost if you bought the system outright and paid regular subscription fees. I have no issue with companies charging a premium for this option, but there's no reason they should be making over $100 over two years for this in my opinion. That's a bit much.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4950d ago
4951d ago
Hicken4951d ago

It shouldn't, and I hope it doesn't.

Heavenly King4951d ago

what happens if you dont pay? The console will stop working or something??

Show all comments (35)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
17d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted17d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8517d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele16d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk16d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay16d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 16d ago
Athlon10117d ago (Edited 17d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit16d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg16d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10116d ago (Edited 16d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14916d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
30d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_30d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle29d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit29d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog30d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog30d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad30d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_30d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage30d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda29d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

30d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong56d ago

looks god awful on the base systems