All Channels
Popular
390°

5 things PS4 needs to win next gen

GC writes, "PS3 was off to a rocky start. The incredibly high loss on each system was devastating, as was the billions in R&D costs. The launch line-up was lackluster and the $600 “get a second job” price was ludicrous. SONY endured through the billions in losses thanks to initial PS3 madness and has managed to take the brand back to profitability, but in the state their in now they need to of learned from their mistakes. The PS4 needs to be success. We have a few ideas regarding how".

Read Full Story >>
gamingcapacity.com
Jackhass4985d ago

I have a feeling Sony is going to have a nice rebound next generation.

blumatt4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

Sony needs a competitive price. $299/399 would be preferable.
They also would benefit greatly from either coming out before Microsoft OR coming out a couple months right after MS.

Keep the online free. That will still serve as a huge reason for people to choose the PS4. Keep PS+ as the premium option for free games and extra services but keep online gaming and cross game chat and a party system ALL FREE.

Other than that we need those network features we were missing on the ps3: cross game chat and a unified party system.

We know their hardware will be great and reliable.

We know the games will be there. Look at all the great games coming out on the PS3 lately and soon to come.

I'm also pretty sure the PS4 will have a new media standard in 4K Blu Ray discs capable of playing 4K movies. The games, for the most part, won't be 4K. Most will be 1080p and 720p. There might be some PSN titles like Stardust HD that do 4K but Uncharted 4 won't be 4K. New Blu Ray discs means even more storage capacity for games and media on the disc. They might finally start selling games and movies together on one disc as an option (e.g. Transformers movie and coinciding game).

We also know that Gaikai will play a big part on the PS4. Cloud steaming of games could eliminate the need for a PS5 anytime soon, possibly allowing for an even longer console cycle.

PS Home is a tricky one. They might axe it due to its niche appeal but they might keep adding to it and make it even more robust with more free games and social experiences.

@reddeaddan. (below)

Free online DOES NOT necessarily equal a poor service. Look at Steam on the PC and pretty much every PC online game. Plus, the PS3 is really only lacking cross game chat and a unified party system. Is that really worth paying for?

Swiggins4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

If the PS4 does all of that, then the only reason for me to keep using Xbox will be a couple of games and the controller....and I could always get a modded controller for the PS4 that's shaped like an Xbox Controller

Edit: That's not a slant against the Dualshock, it's an amazing controller, one of the best designed ever, but I just prefer the Xbox controller, fits better in my hands and I like the triggers more, the bad D-Pad doesn't bother me.

It would be beautiful!

-Alpha4985d ago

Yup,

-Humble price
-Humble hardware for devs to work with
-Before Xbox 3
-Strong launch line of old IPs and new
-Good slogan (PSFour + Lots of Four Sequels-- K4, UC4, GoW4, Jak 4, etc)
-Branded, overhauled PSN for free/Gaikai/Home (I think Home is too far in to quit now, and that Gaikai/new hardware will bring out a better potential
-Official, alternate controller for those uncomfortable with Dualshock to really win over the fans that just have trouble

BitbyDeath4985d ago

Don't forget Motorstorm4 XD

THESONYPS34985d ago

Dont forget with Gaikai the PSVita will be pretty ultimate, as we have built the PS4 to take advantage of the PSVita with an expirence the PS3 couldn't match. Also backwards compatability through psstore etc.

SolidStoner4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

All I want is a not cheap, but best system on marked possible, It could cost 600$, but it should be damn good with at least 7 year guarantee (to be supported with games). It has to be better then PC (not better then "THE" best PC, but average best home PC) if PS4 is that Im buying it anyway, cost is the last thing I care (I dont have much money if you think Im rich or something, Im not!). If I want cheap gaming or something I could buy X-box, no need to rage, Im not saying that its a bad or cheap console, its very good for its price, and I like any console as long as they have good games on them!

EDIT. I prefer SONY brand only for one reason its Gran Turismo series and other titles only Sony have, so in my case I will buy PS4 anyway, no matter what. I trust them!

b163o14984d ago (Edited 4984d ago )

One feature I would like to see, the ability to download off PSN while I'm playing online. It might seem illegitimate, but it'll be a plus to me.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4984d ago
FACTUAL evidence4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

I would say it needs basic online features of a 360 to even stand a chance for next gen. I will not give Sony my money and wait a decade for a decent feature. almost 7 years in and we don't have voice messaging, nor 1 button notifications? I'm not playing the waiting game next year with sony....I made this mistake once, not doing it again.

In my honest opinion Sony took way too much from us than what they really gave us this gen. A lot of fans try to deny it but they all know it's true. Thank god for the games, but even recently the sequels to half of these games were a disappointment.

I really hope Sony does have a plan for next gen because I have lost faith in them. I used to love ps to the point of collecting every trophy. Now if I bother to turn on my ps, it's for corny ass mw3 for just quick action, or scrolling through the boring xmb looking at my friends list. I'm just tired of MS and Sony...I think I might not even be a gamer next gen the way this is shaping for me.

Rhythmattic4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

"I will not give Sony my money and wait a decade for a decent feature. almost 7 years in and we don't have voice messaging, nor 1 button notifications? "

Does this really matter to you on a gaming system? I dont need either to enjoy gaming. Just good damn games is what matters to me.

And for your closing comment, It seems your not actually a gamer "this gen".......

Seraphemz4985d ago

Voice messaging??? How about a "basic" feature like WEB BROWSING...?? The 360 rocked that right out of the box huh?

extermin8or4985d ago

wtf because voice messaging is the be all and end all of whether a device is any good.....

50Terabytespersec4985d ago

If they release GT6 on PS4 then I will surely not buy another Sony product again. why? cause then what? GT 7 on the PS5 lets be real this is BS..

The PS3 is still Amazing and minus the blurry crap visuals GT6 better be coming to PS3!! Same with another Killzone and more Metal Gear Games!

calis4985d ago

There is no reason to think GT7 will be a PS5 game.

blumatt4985d ago

I'd rather they take their time with GT games than try to make three of them on one console like Forza. That's called over-saturation. At least there's been a lot of updates (free) to GT5 since its release.

GT6 as a PS4 launch title would be ideal and would be an amazing launch game.
Just release one GT game per console and give out free updates and more track packs and cars as DLC.

Gwyn-Lord-Of-Cinder4985d ago

im pulling 4 them . i use to be all about xbox untill i saw how much support sony had to the hardcore gamers . they really do desrerve to lead the way this genaration.

andibandit4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

Sony seriously needs to shift a couple of gears up this coming generation. Microsoft has already realized that the hardcore gaming market is too small and are now gunning for apple in the battle for the living room. Nintendo struck gold with the casual market and are trying more of the same. Im am a bit worried that sony will get left behind with a smaller hardcore userbase and all the developers will focus on whatever console has the biggest userbase, and ps4 will get a slew of ported games like we did half thru this gen.

WeskerChildReborned4985d ago

Hopefully, i can't wait to see what next gen will look like.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4984d ago
NastyLeftHook04985d ago

the same 5 things sony did to win this one.

1. exclusive aaa games (uncharted, lbp, infamous, metal gear solid 4, heavy rain, god of war, journey, the last of us ect..

2. reliable hardware

3. free online

4. bluray (maybe 500 gigs( ps4)

5. crossplay.

ReDDeaDDan4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

But they didn't win this one. They came dead last.

Free online = Poor service - FACT

EDIT: Online Console service.

BitbyDeath4985d ago

'Free online = Poor service - FACT'

You do realise PC has always been free and is the best online service available?

one2thr4985d ago

@Red
Pc online gaming is free, and it has been a fantastic service for me so far...

**Remember, one does not simply has a better online service just because they paid for it**

Because at the end of each day, and pay period your only giving the company your paying money to, the right to charge you use your OWN BANDWIDTH, and the other 50% of your purchased games that have a multiplayer option... Think about it...

NastyLeftHook04985d ago

im talking from a gamers perspective.

ziggurcat4985d ago

@ reddeaddan:

sure, if you consider hardware sales to be the defining factor, but even then the wii would be the victor. the reality is that the quality of the gaming experience (i frankly don't care about the ability to chat with people while playing a different game or creating a party) has been vastly superior (in my opinion) on the PS3.

so in that respect, i believe sony came out on top.

also, free online =/= poor service. PSN is just fine, i've had zero problems with their service. free online means not having to pay an extra $60 just to play half of the game you already paid $60 for...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4985d ago
CommonSenseGamer4985d ago

The big winner this generation, like it or not, has to be MS for establishing themselves as a real player in the console gaming market. In terms of market share Sony is this generations biggest loser.

youndamie4985d ago

LOL real player? by abandoning their hard core gamer market?. At the start of the generation I would agree, but as of now Sony is the clear leader.

one2thr4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

@Common
Kinect, viva pinata, the game where players can tickle a tiger, a racing game that requires no effort to play, 3 ip's compared to 10 ip's from both nin and sony, RROD(which caused gamers to buy multiple xbox's, so that people can boast about sales figures), lacking HDMI for about 3 years since launch until system revision, doesnt support HD-Dvd's, and its media format is DVD-9 which doesnt have the option to increase storage capacity like regular dvd's, proprietary components; harddrive, memory card, etc., giant non-rechargeable battery looking power supply, scratches its own disk when reoriented, can't copy music, pictures, videos, etc. to various storage devices, doesnt support 1080p, its best selling game wasnt system compatible and went through a series of updates, and it was an exclusive title to that system, and its new exclusive title is a continuation of 1 of the 3 mentioned worth talking about ips, i'll make it 4(counting Alann Wake)....

The list goes on, but why bother....

And MS (Xbox), won this generation how?....

And oh the PS3 was out selling it since launch apparently...

tommygunzII4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

In terms of gaming, Xbox customers are the biggest losers lately.

thorstein4985d ago

As everyone knows there were no "winners." Nintendo, Microsoft and SONY all released enormously successful platforms. If you compare sales to the PS2, well, no console has come close to that behemoth.

This gen was solid from the start and is finishing even stronger. But the BS about "winners" or "losers" becomes completely moot once those systems reach 10s of millions of units sold. And as hardware figures go, SONY and MS pale in comparison what Nintendo does. So, sales do not make a solid argument that sales equal quality (see Apple).

AAA Games and Exclusives have been argued to death with the PS3 crowds yelling about the plethora of exclusives and MS crowds screaming that their exclusives have better quality.

Reddead claims that the Free Online for PSN is a poor service and that it is a FACT. Which brings me to the worst part about this generation: fanboys spreading lies about the other system. Online gameplay differs in one aspect between the Xbox and PS: cross game chat. (Note: just talking about online play and NOTHING ELSE). I have heard so many lies about the Xbox and so many lies about the PS3 that if they were all to be believed both systems would have been so bad that neither would ever have been able to play games let alone be connected to a television without blowing up entire city blocks.

Enough with the BS. No one really believes it. You sound like democrats and republicans arguing about which of their guys is better. The only difference is that if you put a room full of PS3s or Xbox360s in a room by themselves they could govern the USA better than the current crop of idiots.

Malice-Flare4985d ago

the important #6 - a big marketing budget with a competent marketing dept...

Treian4985d ago

Sony has never been focused on winning. They have been focused on delivering quality games and entertainment...

JellyJelly4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

Yes. Multinational corporations like Sony love losing money. Are you really that gullible? They went into the console business because they saw a market window. Sony took a large market share with the PS1 & PS2 that they have lost most of to MS and Nintendo this gen. Judging by the Vita they aren't doing anything to change their strategy for the better.

Some of you need to drop this childlike mentality towards the gaming business.

wishingW3L4985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

if they keep delivering then gamers will naturally flock to their systems. Don't you think this is a better business plan for us and for them if it works? Gamers aren't stupid, they will chose the system with the better games. Or at least this is what I think....

Treian4985d ago

hey I am just quoting what one of the sony higher ups said. don't hate.

Blu Ray34985d ago (Edited 4985d ago )

Sony needs to invest in ADVERTISING in the USA to outsell the new MS console.
Ps4 will have cross chat.....GAME OVER:)
Hell,they've beaten them worldwide.
Blu Ray is an amazing perk!!
As long as MS doesn't jump on the bandwagon like they always do.
If Sony can go head to head with MS on the USA advertisement front,they'll have no prob taking back the crown:)

CommonSenseGamer4985d ago

So, is the getting the crown back important or not? The post above yours would suggest its not important to Sony.

Hicken4981d ago

What makes you think they can't do both? Blu Ray3 mentions things that shouldn't at all hinder what blahblah346 quoted. Can they not "get the crown back" by "focusing on delivering quality games and entertainment?"

Seems to me like doing the latter would put you in a good position to do the former.

Show all comments (79)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
4d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted3d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy853d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele3d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk3d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay3d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
Athlon1013d ago (Edited 3d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit3d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg3d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon1012d ago (Edited 2d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz1493d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
17d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_16d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle16d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit16d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog16d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog16d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad16d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_16d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage16d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda16d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

16d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong42d ago

looks god awful on the base systems