All Channels
Popular
300°

Will all Three Next-Gen Consoles be Unique?

While we have a pretty good idea about what the Wii U is and what Nintendo’s strategy is going to be, details about Sony and Microsoft’s next consoles have been very limited. However, based on comments made by these companies, I believe that the next generation of gaming will feature three very different consoles with separate strategies and functionalities.

Read Full Story >>
zeldainformer.com
Phil325018d ago (Edited 5018d ago )

I hope so. I don't want stagnation in the industry.

decrypt5018d ago (Edited 5018d ago )

Well the next Xbox and Playstation will be very simular, as they will essentially be locked down low end PCs. This isnt a bad thing at all, Sony and MS know console gamers dont care about graphics. A few hundred million spent on marketing campaigns will easily have the console gamers convinced that the tech being used is really high end.

Both will be using simular low cost packages from AMD. The only differences u may get will be gimmicks like move and kinect were, the differences wont be really game changers. Then alas u also have the exclusives, the way things are going more and more developers are finding it difficult to survive of just one platform. I think only the really big exclusives will probably survive. Everything else probably will go multiplat.

@below

Sony has always said alot of things. Remember the promises about being 1080p capable, well only 5% games this gen were able to run in 1080p, 95% games ran in 720 or sub hd. Or remember how they claimed most games on PS3 would run at 60fps, yet 95% games run at 30fps or below. Id take comments from a console maker with a grain of salt, history just has a way of repeating itself.

There are more hints at Sony ditching the Cell and diteching BC along with it. More chances they go AMD, Sony fans may be but hurt over this. But later on they will be cheerleading what ever Sony says :)

BitbyDeath5018d ago (Edited 5018d ago )

Low end pcs?
Read Sonys quote again.

“It’s about being the best. If you can build a better machine, and it’s going to come out a little bit later, that’s better than rushing something to market that’s going to run out of gas for the long term. Ideally, in a perfect world, you want the best machine that ships first, that’s cheapest. But the number one goal is to be the best machine, and that’s what we’re always focused on.”

Sony are not aiming low.
Also it is rumoured Sony will be using cell again not amd

Silver-Hawk5018d ago

I can't wait for ps4. I would pay it off in full right now if given the chance because that's how excited I am to get the console. I have no doubt that it will be amazing with cutting edge technology

reynod5018d ago

@bitbydeath

PS3 was perhaps Sonys most ambitious attempt at making high end hardware. I dont think Sony will be repeating the attempt as it caused them tremendous losses. Infact they havent yet been able to recoup the losses even though the gen is about to end.

However even when we consider PS3 vs PCs of its launch time. PS3 was strictly Low to mid range in comparison.

PS3 used a 78XX series GPU which was significantly butched comapared to a standard 7800GTX.

Cell tried to do 2 things at once and ended up performing badly at both the tasts. Be it CPU taks, Cell would get slughtered against a dual core cpu. When it came to graphics tasks, Cell was terribad which is why Sony had to opt for watered down 78xx series gpu from Nvidia.

Everyone knows the memory implementation of the PS3 was so limiting that you cant even have cross game chat.

PS3 launched with 5400 rpm Hard drives, which were strictly low end.

Hence from no angle would i categorize Sony best attempt at going high end a good one. It was strictly mid range at best.

Now in todays day and age, With all the Losses sony has taken its not possible they make the same attempt like the PS3. PS4 will no way be such an aggressive attempt.

Sony just dont afford it. Just for the record Sony was valued at 200billion usd back in 2000, today they stand at a mere 14billion usd. So no i dont see Sony making an attempt even close to the one they made with the PS3. It will be an attempt to make money asap. Which means PS4 will be low end to mid range at best at launch.

1upgamer995018d ago

Good luck with Sony. Sony will NOT be able to sell PS4 at a loss for 5 years like it did with PS3. The shareholders will NOT allow it. A base PS3 was $499 at launch so if you think PS4 is going to be this HUGE graphical leap you are in for a let down. There is just no way most gamers are going to dish out $650 on a PS4 when PS3 just started selling really well in the past 2 years because the price came down.

BrutallyBlunt5018d ago

I think Microsoft and Sony need to identify themselves more this coming generation from each other. Microsoft had XBOX Live going for them and Sony had BLURAY. Sony has basically caught up to XBOX Live in many ways (while still offering the core service for free) but BLURAY never really made the dent Sony wanted when it came to gaming. Microsoft went with Kinect but that was midway through the console cycle.

Silver-Hawk5018d ago (Edited 5018d ago )

You fanboys of inferior technology are so upset because whatever you support will never get the support like Sony does for PlayStation or the hardware that Sony makes. You guys can beat around the bush all day saying that other systems get supported a lot but its not even close to the content playstation gets.

ps4 will be amazing and powerful and get a lot of software support like ps3. when you look at all other systems they have less ips and barely any new games on the horizon for them. PlayStation has more games on the horizon coming out this year and next more than Nintendo, Microsoft

cee7735018d ago

The only reason Sony took so much losses on ps3 is because of research & development costs which was over 4 billion because of the cell and 200 dollar loss on every ps3 sold because of blue ray

Ps4 will not lose billions on r&d next Gen
And they have blue ray at under 12$

So Sony could still put some beefy tech in ps4 and not lose much next Gen has to be powerful because if not then mobile will take it over spec wise mobiles will be more powerful tan even wii u in a couple years but next Gen will be USB 3.0 so maybe we can add upgrades via USB 3.0

SilentNegotiator5018d ago

You know what they say about assumptions.....

Well, obviously, YOU don't, but uh...

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5018d ago
3-4-55018d ago

Same here. I feel they have done a decent job of giving us something different if you really take the time to compare differences.

Xbox = best online gaming experience you can have.

Nintendo = Best games that will still be GREAT 10+ years from now. Also they have solid hardware.

Sony = Your going to get GREAT JRPG's and imports from Japan.

Sony & Nintendo = Both are Good at giving us Console Specific IP's that are not only good, but stand the test of time.

Xbox lacks in exclusive content , but they also have Great indie game support.

All 3 already offer a ton of differences , but most people think they know everything already and fail to look logically at all the facts.

I'm confident that all will give us something different.

Nintendo is 100% going that route, and even if they won't admit it, it does put CREATIVE pressure on Microsoft and Sony.

Outside_ofthe_Box5018d ago (Edited 5018d ago )

That would be ideal. All 3 consoles would so unique that not owning all three would be a crime. MS has next gen kinect and Ninty has the game pad, so we all know those 2 consoles won't very similar. It's all riding on Sony now. I hope they bring something that the others haven't/aren't doing next gen.

Reverent5018d ago

It's already a crime to not own all three. Every console this generation has amazing perks. Although I only own a PS3, I've always felt like I am not getting 100% out of my gaming experience because I keep missing out on games like Halo or Zelda. The PS4 will for sure be the priority for me next gen, but I really hope money won't be so tight and I will be able to expand my gaming vocabulary to all possible games in the time to come.

joab7775017d ago

They are already beginning to separate themselves. I love Sony and I do believe that they will dominate the next 2-3 years of this Gen. But I think Microsoft has the leg up on next Gen as an extension of the pc in the living room. They may b looking to sell the next Xbox like a smartphone getting an Xbox in everyone's living room for a small monthly fee. Also, it will be seamless with everyone's pc running win.8. They may even try f2p models to become the place to go. Also, they have partnered with time Warner to offer some type of cable service too. And as much as I hate kinect, I love minority report and the idea of operating everything with my hands is appealing.

So, Sony won't be doing the same things. They do have gaikai so what they do may be unique unto themselves. Yeah, games may be similar but with the vita and Xbox new app, the way we play games is going to be different. And, Sony has shown serious commitment to exclusives so look for them to win people over that way. Does anyone think that a ps4 tv model would sell? Yeah, I operate on tangents.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5017d ago
NYC_Gamer5018d ago (Edited 5018d ago )

The big 3 console brand owners will launch their hardware with unique features/software to attract customers

iamgoatman5018d ago

Love that you can clearly see when people got tired of the joke.

Reverent5018d ago

That, or people REALLY just hate the number "8".
:P

SilentNegotiator5018d ago (Edited 5018d ago )

I hate the number 8 so much, I hit disagree just to change the count to 9.
lol

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5017d ago
Ben_Grimm5018d ago

I'm hoping there will be, but seeing how the PS3 and 360 are pretty similar I'm guessing the next consoles will be too.

Oh_Yeah5018d ago (Edited 5018d ago )

other than their alternative controllers and exclusives, theyll be like restricted pc's once again. unless virtual reality starts up.

hellvaguy5018d ago

Restricted from most viruses and online cheating. Yes, hopefully.

Oh_Yeah5018d ago (Edited 5018d ago )

good points, porn is best viewed on consoles because viruses havnt been written for them, not that i know of, i also prefer the trophies/achievements over steams current setup. but were talking about "unique" features here. its going to be a hard task for the 3 to come up with ways that really separate them from just being called restricted computers. features that are totally EXCLUSIVE

ill put it in perspective, the wii is already emulated on pc in 1080p, you can also use your wii motes too. PC also has a version of kinect...so whats making consoles unique at the moment other than exclusives on the ps3 and the lol 3 exclusives on the 360? nothing much...so the likes of virtual reality, streamed game controllers etc. are going to be those innovations. once again though...pc can just tack those features on with ease, its going to take some patents to keep them away from going to the pc.

Show all comments (66)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio25d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing25d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9225d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit25d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing25d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9225d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
28d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted27d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8527d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele27d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk27d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay26d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 26d ago
Athlon10127d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit26d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg26d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10126d ago (Edited 26d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14927d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay27d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn227d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn226d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown27d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay27d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay27d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac26d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger27d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300027d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde27d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde26d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)