All Channels
Popular
190°

Why Sony’s Gamescom Showing Is Both Impressive and Worrisome | RipTen

Coming out of E3, Sony had some problems to address. While the PlayStation powerhouse showed off impressive exclusives like The Last of Us and Beyond: Two Souls, they also suffered from the momentum-breaking Wonderbook and an utter lack of a push for the PlayStation Vita. Having attended that conference in person, I experienced firsthand the ups and downs of their demonstration that failed to excite the masses as it otherwise should have. Last week at Gamescom, however, Sony saw the error of its ways and delivered the conference fans wanted at E3.

Capt-FuzzyPants5025d ago ShowReplies(3)
smashcrashbash5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

So the only things that worry you is a single game and the fact that they didn't announce a price drop which they already explained that they would be using bundles and won't be dropping the price until next year? Talk about reaching for problems.

Vivalajmax5025d ago

Well first of all thank you for the comment on the article, always appreciate someone reading my work, but I think if you read my work a little more closely you'll find my problem with the Vita is slightly different than what you say. I do address the price drop concern I have and say it can be brushed aside because of the Cross Buy functionality. I may not mention the bundles but I am well aware of them and that is why I do not harp too much on the price, so I'm sorry if you thought that was one of my primary points.

My main problem with the system, and this is as a Vita owner, is that the release of quality exclusive titles is too few and far between. Granted, the Cross Buy games are great selections, but they aren't true exclusives. I'd love to see a Sound Shapes, a Gravity Rush or a Lumines style exclusive released more than every couple of months. I think that's what the issue is because enough quality exclusives with quality multiplatform releases in between can really turn those who are not sure, at least that's what I think.

And when one of the most important exclusives is given to an unproven developer, that worries me even further. Those were my main concerns, the lack of games and the problems with one very key title. I don't believe that is reaching for problems, but I think to say the Vita has no issues is ignoring the fact that the system isn't selling for a reason. This happens to be the reason I believe, but that's just my thoughts about it.

miDnIghtEr20C_SfF5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

How dare you say anything bad about Sony, or the Vita!!!!11!!!one!!111!

@sway_z below.. why did you forget to mention the 360? Is the 360 hate on this site justified or something? Or did you just forget to add that to your list of things to be shameful of?

tiffac0085025d ago

I am also worried about CoD: Declassified.

Not because its made by an unproven developer but because of the development time.

I always believe, even a middle tier developer can do great things given the time but if the time is constraint, even the best developer will have problems making a quality game.

I hope I am wrong but for a big title like this. I think rushing it would be a bad thing.

GribbleGrunger5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

Vivalajmax

You say quality exclusives as if a high tech handheld like the Vita can conjure them at will. High quality requires time and effort and the more powerful the machine, the bigger the expectations. The expectations for the Vita aren't actually that far from the PS3 so you should expect a similar development time.

It's been on the market for a little over six months. Now I'm sure you would be the first to complain if 3rd party devs did just push lower class games, even if there were ten a month.

It's a choice you made when you bought the Vita. It's inherent in that purchase and so it was inevitable that the games would take longer to make. I knew that but I bought one at launch anyway. So, if you are going to complain about the lack of games, you better also expect lower quality games if you get what you want.

I'm sure if you did, this article would be slightly different and you would be complaining about that instead. I always find it telling when people write articles like this. They assume that everyone has exactly the same taste in games. What you want is not what everyone wants, but of course these articles will always draw in those that HAVE got similar tastes to you, even if they're in the minority.

many people are very happy with the software lineup. Some people are very happy that they can play PSP games too. I'm happy to have played only Golden Abyss in wait for LBPVita, but do you see me complaining about the lack of games? No, because I can only speak for myself and would never assume I am in the majority

joeorc5024d ago

" I'd love to see a Sound Shapes, a Gravity Rush or a Lumines style exclusive released more than every couple of months."

would that go for everyone? but let's go back to reality for a min. There is no way on god's green earth that is even remotely going to happen!

The more indepth, the more extensive the game is going to be, the more time it's going to take to pass QA, if you don't than your going to have bug's that quite frankly in all likely hood break the game. If you do not expect it, than your not being very prudent, in making sure the game can release without as much bug's and glitches as you can.

beside's what your asking for Playstation Mobile is set to address those very concern's

the Number of developer's and publisher's have increased not shrunk, So sony must have reached some of the 3rd party developer's that were on the fence about developing for the Playstation Vita.

Those are Still Playstation Exclusives, your devices has to be compliant and on top of that, SCEE will be making Game's for the Playstation Mobile.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5024d ago
OhMyGandhi5025d ago

..and we thought the Syrians had it bad.

Zechs345025d ago

There's always something to bring Sony down with isnt there

Xperia_ion5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

Worrisome for my wallet, *wallet cries* shhhh *slaps it*.

sway_z5025d ago

So called 'Gamers' should hang their heads in shame for the hate the Vita, Wii U & PS3 are getting.....

A real 'Gamer' would be happy there is choice and difference in our industry...instead willing failure.

Show all comments (16)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
27d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted27d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8527d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele26d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk26d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay26d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 26d ago
Athlon10127d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit26d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg26d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10126d ago (Edited 26d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14926d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
40d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_40d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle39d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit39d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog40d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog40d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad40d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_40d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage40d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda39d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

40d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong66d ago

looks god awful on the base systems