150°

PS Vita: Sony’s Pulling In The Wrong Direction

With its slow start and lacklustre sales can Sony's triple-A PS Vita line up save the console? NowGamer's Editor In Chief doesn't think so.

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
5004d ago
MastaMold5004d ago

How cutie still more doom & gloom after Gamescom as Sony delivers more games

Sent from my PS Vita

joeorc5004d ago (Edited 5004d ago )

Playstation Mobile when it officialy launches this fall will have 30! once again that is 30 of these Quick pick up and play type of games that he was claiming Sony does not get this part of the market anymore..god, Sony is selling 7.4 million xperia smartphones per sales quarter, android has the commanding lead for OS's powering smartphones and he's really saying Sony has learned from the PSP with the PSVita?

Like you cannot offer both style's of Game playing on the system or something?

MrBeatdown5004d ago (Edited 5004d ago )

As do I.

Last I checked, GTA, Peace Walker, God of War, Crisis Core, and plenty of other large-scale games did quite well on PSP. All these years, I've been playing GTA, Syphon Filter, Midnight Club, Burnout, God of War and Metal Gear.

If this guy wants to play Angry Birds, he can. I tried all the Minis I got with my PS+ subscription, and they felt more like time wasters than a way to make the most of my time.

If I need a quick fix and I'm not sitting in front of my TV, I'll take a quick round of team deathmatch or a few minutes crashing through billboards in Most Wanted over some oddball puzzle game or whatever it is that this guy sees as the right fit for handhelds. If I wouldn't even consider playing it on my PS3, why the hell would I want to play it at all? Whether I have three hours to play or 15 minutes, I want to play something good.

And he has completely missed the point of the whole "cross buy" thing. It's not about beating the game on PS3, then playing it all over again on Vita. It's about being able to play through it once no matter where you are.

Outside_ofthe_Box5004d ago

***"If I wouldn't even consider playing it on my PS3, why the hell would I want to play it at all? Whether I have three hours to play or 15 minutes, I want to play something good."***

Exactly, besides using popular franchises I think is the way to go early on in the Vita's life cycle as long as they aren't ports. If R* were to make a full scale GTA spin-off on the Vita I'm pretty sure the author would be singing a different tune.

As you said, it worked well with PSP. If you were to ask people what their favorite PSP game was I'm sure one of the games you mentioned such as Crisis Core would pop up from time to time. Once the Vita has a solid amount of owners new IPs will certainly come.

Gamerpeanuts5003d ago

I like the Vita its a powerhouse amd is handsdown the best handheld. I hope its sales go up, the line up looks god...except for CoD declassified...even thoigh i despise Killzone with all my heart knowing for certain its...NOT A HALO KILLER PEOPLE!! KILLZONE WILL NEVER LIVE UP 2 HALO! JUST PRE-OREDER Halo 4! BOOM! maybe ill even pick up Killzone. I just wished people got Vita rather than a 3DS or wasting money on their stuipid iPhones to support somthing that can change hand-helds forever. But no...Yet i belive Vita wont die...and im gonna suck it up and help sony although i dont use my PS3 i use my xbox, and help them with the Vita....

sent from my Vita :D

wardestroyr5004d ago

I also disagree completely. Just look at the hit-mongering headline - someone is obviously dismayed at the fact that PS Vita is finally getting a bit of love after months of unrelenting, and more importantly, undeserved bashing.

Give the device a break. It's only six months old. I find it absolutely incredible that no matter what Sony does to try and please it's userbase, the same bitter, attention-seeking individuals have to dive out of obscurity and condemn whatever is presented.

The Vita will sell well this holiday season. It probably won't outsell 3DS, but it will easily sell at least 6 million devices worldwide from Sept-Dec 2012. Combine great bundles (Black Ops Declassified), an increased budget for marketing, and positive word-of-mouth with a variety of appealing titles and you have a recipe for success.

TGS 12 will restore faith in PS Vita in Japan. Just look at how the handheld was presented at Gamescom 2012. Sony are on a mission with this device. I would definitely expect Monster Hunter to appear for Vita at TGS, in addition to old favorites such as Final Fantasy, Metal Gear, Resident Evil, and new 1st-party Sony titles. Vita has a bright future.

GribbleGrunger5004d ago (Edited 5004d ago )

I've been thinking about the number Sony wants to hit by the end of the fiscal year. 10 million seems a mighty large number, even if sales do increase (and I believe they will).

At the current rate, I'd put the figure nearer 7.5 million... So why are Sony so optimistic? There is one possible answer and the only answer that makes any sense. Sony have said that there is not going to be a price drop, so we can discount that. What we do have an inkling of is the new builds of PS3s that are due out later this year (assuming the rumours and pics were true)

Nintendo have been keen on hiding their pricing for the Wiiu... why would they do that? The industry has eyes we unfortunates are never going to see with, so perhaps they know something we don't.

A price drop is out of the question but how much will the rumoured 16GB PS3 be? If it's priced correctly and bundled with a Vita around Christmas, this could shift quite a hefty amount of both console and Vita and of course it would compete directly with the Wiiu.

When you look at the cross buy and the fact that they're adding cross play via a firmware update, you can see that this is quite the probablity, especially when you know that LBP2 is going to get DLC that allows cross play and cross create.

Don't just disagree for the sake of it. Consider that, I really think it warrants scrutiny

DeadlyFire5004d ago

Only thing I say that would top off Vita would be if I could see PS3/PS4 games on Vita playing PS3/PS4 players at home with same game with say with something like GaiKai.

Or ya know a downloadless GaiKai powered PSN for Vita would be awesome as well.

That is well for the fans of that. Don't know about bandwidth charges and all. That would be my only concern with that.

Fez5004d ago (Edited 5004d ago )

I agree with the article.

I would have no use for Vita. It's too big to fit in my pocket so it's not going to be carried around with me all the time. I too would not be interested playing a game like AC for 20 minutes at a time (which I think portable gaming should be - short burst of fun) - most Vita game seem like they would be best for longer play time.
Also the games and memory cards are too expensive for me.

I have a PS3 which provides a similar but better gaming experience and I've just bought a Sony smartphone so Vita really has no use for me. It's a good bit of hardware but redundant for someone like me who just wants a quick time waster for portable gaming and a deeper experience on console or pc.

Knushwood Butt5004d ago

Each to their own.

I regularly walk past a guy on the way to work who plays Solitaire on his phone while walking.

Solitaire.

While walking.

Apparently, he likes it so much he has to play it while walking to work...

Each to their own.

Personally, I'll stick with Metal Gear Solid 2 on my Vita for now. I have to admit, I don't play while walking.

Mounce5004d ago

Well Fez, naturally you should stop wearing such god damn TIGHT PANTS! Thats your problem ;o Too big to fit in your pants? Sheesh, let the women wear the tight-tight ass-pants, Silly Fez...

Aaah, 70's Show.....

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5003d ago
skyward5004d ago

Black Ops Declassified looked lacklustre - more things like Gravity Rush please.

NukaCola5004d ago (Edited 5004d ago )

Blops Declass is a game made by terrible developers and it shows. But they have time to take in the feedback and fix it. A Beta would help to promote it as well. Activision doesnt care about Sony, just their money so who knows how it will turn out.

Killzone Mercenary is looking pretty good. The graphics re pretty and it looks like a good pick up and play style game. Hopefully the Online with rock too. I mean if you need an FPS fix.

The Cross Buy with Vita is pretty awesome. I am excited to take my Allstars on the go and Sound Shapes too. Plus the interaction with Vita with the new Sly Cooper game. (Has that GB with Tingle from the Minish Cap vibe) and they are really trying to make the Vita and PS3(4) one spirit if you will.

We have originals like Tear Away and brain crazed game Smart As. Sony is hitting the hardcore and the casual and the families and the true gamers of the world. They are in fact pulling in the right direction.

Mustang300C20125004d ago

@ NukaCola

How exactly do they have time to fix what we saw of BO: Declassified in just 2 months?

NukaCola5004d ago

Pray it's old footage..I don't know my friend.

shadow27975004d ago

@RedHemi300c

Because it looks like they created it in 3. It likely took much longer, but the entire game is recycled Black Ops assets. Surely they can work on mechanics and polish it up in two months, at least a little.

The Vita is supposedly really easy to program for. Tearaway only took a year with 15 people working on it.

I'm not saying we'll see a drastic change, but there is still hope.

dafegamer5004d ago

another doom gloom article by an obvious nintendo fanboy

majiebeast5004d ago (Edited 5004d ago )

Plenty of good original games coming to vita with Tear away,Soul sacrifice and Dragons crown to name a few. Still hoping for sony to announce LOTD 2 for vita at TGS. Sony should buy out Nippon ichi and make them their flagship psvita game developer.

Protagonist5004d ago (Edited 5004d ago )

This guy will never get handheld gaming. I said it many times before, handhelds and handheld gaming is a lifestyle. I game on my PSVITA all the time, In such extend that I stopped using my PS3 connected to my 40" Sony Bravia. I do not want "the game world to wash over" me
, I want the games close to me so I can almost feel it and I prefere it on a dedicated amazing piece of handheld gaming device called the PSVITA. I dont play on my PSVITA to kill a few hours...smh. I play on my PSVITA because I freaking love it, but I guess Nick Jones will never get it.

Nick Jones: "Sitting down in front of a TV with a game that’s as epic in scale as an Assassin’s Creed game is a major commitment in time and effort. You want the game world to wash over you, to become absorbed in that particular digital frontier. It’s really hard to replicate the effect of having your vision completely filled with a game world on a 5” screen...Most people play portable games in those moments when they’re trying to kill a few minutes or hours of time: when you’re on the bus, or train, before you nod off to sleep or while you’re guiltily killing time till the weekend starts."

Show all comments (37)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
3d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted3d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy853d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele2d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk2d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay2d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Athlon1013d ago (Edited 3d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit2d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg2d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon1012d ago (Edited 2d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz1492d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
16d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_16d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle15d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit15d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog16d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog16d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad16d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_16d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage16d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda15d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

16d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong42d ago

looks god awful on the base systems