All Channels
Popular
150°

What Could Microsoft Surface Mean for Gaming?

Confirmed by the company today, the Microsoft Surface tablet will release in October the same day as Windows 8. Aside from competing with Apple in the tablet market, what ramifications might be in store for gaming?

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
5038d ago
Christopher5038d ago (Edited 5038d ago )

Nothing tablet gaming hasn't already done, IMHO. In fact, it will be playing catch up the first year or two to Android and iOS devices. And, then, even though it has shown some nice hardware specs, its software end may not last as being the best out there considering a new iPad is expected and new Android tablets are put out every six months.

As far as operating like other console controllers, a purely tablet based device will work poorer than actual gaming devices with extra controls and a focus on integrating similar OS-based devices.

dark-hollow5038d ago (Edited 5038d ago )

the surface PRO is running the full windows 8 experience which means it can run PC games (depends on the game requirements and the hardware to play it) but seriously no comparison.

the surface pro blows any ipad, android tablet out of the water!

mcstorm5038d ago

I cant wait to get a surface pro. It is going to replace my laptop and moto xoom as with the ipad and android tablets you still need a pc to carry out some simple tasks like printing archive emails edit full office and full we browsing.

Add game to that it makes the surface one of if not the best tablet we have ever seen.

Christopher5038d ago

We don't know if surface blows anything out of the water yet, first. Second, the next Android and iOS tablets could blow this version of Surface out of the water. You know, it's that thing where technology continues to advance.

And, trust me, I love the concept of the Surface. I'm not sold on it, I need to see some reviews and apps on it. But, it's a huge contender for replacing my iPad in October.

dark-hollow5038d ago (Edited 5038d ago )

you still dont quite get it.
there are two version of the surface, the regular one and the pro one.

the regular one is cheaper and runs on windows 8 RT which is a basically windows phone 8 for tabelts, it runs on ARM cpus and cant do everything the normal desktop can do. its a media consumption device at it core, and a direct competitor to the ipad and android tablets.

the surface PRO however is a total different beast!

the surface pro is a FULLY FUNCTIONAL LAPTOP!
that can get detached from the keyboard dock and act like a tablet on the go! it run on X84 CPUs just like desktops and will come with intel i7 processor.

it have the same version of windows 8 on desktop, but this time windows 8 is more optimized for multitouch inputs in comparison to the half assed windows 7 tablets.

it basically runs windows full apps (EXE) its not just a half assed mobile OS in a tablet!

IOS 6 and jelly bean just dont compare to a full OS like windows 8 on the surface (PRO)

nukeitall5038d ago (Edited 5038d ago )

@cgoodno:

I think the power is in the MS eco-system whereby their tools are highly unified and the main advantage that nobody else has is Xbox Live integration. Also, the ability to start a game on one platform and seamlessly jump to another is fantastic.

I think there is a reason why Valve is upset, because Xbox Live and the app store might just be a valid contender!

I know for a fact, Android is shit and performs like it. iOS though is solid, but lacks some of the things XBL offers!

We will have to see, but the ability to have a tablet with x86 perform like a desktop would do wonders for gaming in my opinion. Wish they built in that Wireless Gaming adapter for the Xbox 360 controller and you got pure gaming bliss!

Christopher5038d ago (Edited 5038d ago )

***I think the power is in the MS eco-system whereby their tools are highly unified and the main advantage that nobody else has is Xbox Live integration. Also, the ability to start a game on one platform and seamlessly jump to another is fantastic.***

SmartGlass is going to give everyone Xbox Live integration.

I don't think the majority of games will be corss-platform compatible, either.

***I think there is a reason why Valve is upset, because Xbox Live and the app store might just be a valid contender!***

Not because it's going to be a contender, but because it's going to be a cooked in contender with built-in advertising towards it. There's no way to compete with the OS maker decides who sees what first. This is akin to standard PC OS moving towards the closed OSs of phones.

I think there's going to be a lot of issues with this type of move. At least I hope there will.

***it basically runs windows full apps (EXE) its not just a half assed mobile OS in a tablet!***

It doesn't "basically" run full apps. It's just like mobile devices, it runs apps made for it. It's just like the other OSs out there for tablets/phones (Android/iOS).

***IOS 6 and jelly bean just dont compare to a full OS like windows 8 on the surface (PRO)***

I disagree with that. A lot. Especially as far as application purposes.

You look at Transformer Prime tablets, they run laptop quality applications on it. This is what Surface will do as well.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5038d ago
givemeshelter5038d ago

It's running a full blown OS unlike the iPad and all the Android Tablets.
This is the HUGE advantage of the Surface PRO.

aviator1895038d ago

It's a tablet-sized device with tablet/pc capabilities, so it's essentially already superior to the ipad and android tablets through functionality already. In terms of execution, we'll just have to see but I'm pretty darn sure that ms won't release a half-baked product.

andrewsqual5038d ago

Or more importantly for Microsoft "What Could Microsoft Surface Mean for Games for Windows Live Gaming?" Absolutely nothing because Steam is da shit.

h311rais3r5038d ago

The only ones disagreeing with you are console gamers lol. They don't know how aweful gfwl is...

Oh sorry you restarted your pc while I was saving? I guess you don't want your games saved. DELETE!

NOOOOOOOOoooooooooooo....... Cough

the worst5038d ago

it means nothing
Microsoft Surface will be a bust
just like window mobile

Saryk5038d ago

I don't know. I would have never thought MS would be were they are with the Xbox. I wouldn't bet against them.

nukeitall5038d ago (Edited 5038d ago )

I wouldn't either. Time and time again, if MS really wants it they get it. They will outspend everyone, and put humongous resources on it. Only huge companies like Google and Apple can stand against them.

Just pray MS isn't hungry and stays that way.

@Saryk:

Nobody would have believed it during the first Xbox console. It was the laughing stock and look at it now!

WeskerChildReborned5038d ago

I thought Microsoft Surface was just a tablet/laptop, i didn't know it was gonna have something to do with gaming.

ExCest5038d ago

It's not even running a gaming graphic card. It's an ultrabook. Nothing less, nothing more. It has enough graphics to get you minecraft running.

Show all comments (22)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio17d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing17d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9217d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit17d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing17d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9217d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay19d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn219d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn218d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown19d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay19d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay19d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac18d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger19d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300019d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde19d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde18d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7520d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_18d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.