All Channels
Popular
60°

A Single Console World

A musing about how things would change if there were only one console format in existence. What are the implications of a single industry standard with no competitors.

Read Full Story >>
bestgamerintheworld.me
Chaostar5052d ago

I've thought about this a lot and I agree with the writer. While competition can breed excellence it can also choke a market, fracture game development and cause confusion.

If we look back at previous generations, there's always been one console that dominated the market but we never had a lack of quality games or paid DLC or insane DRM.

The developers and publishers are where the competition should lie, they can battle among themselves to make their game stand out. The upside to the developers is that they only have to make games for a single system focusing their efforts on making the game run as best it can on that platform without the worry/hassle/cost of porting or side by side development.

In the end, like most big business, it's all about control. The console manufacturers want to control the content you enjoy, to take their cut and promote their brand so there'll never be a single console. We're stuck with bickering companies and rabid fanboys until cloud gaming takes over, oh, and expect tons of whining about that too.

hennessey865052d ago

is only ever a good thing and as for cloud gaming taking over............when that happens I will stick with the last console I purchased.

Chaostar5052d ago (Edited 5052d ago )

Yup, that's the mantra alright but why? You used your one bubble to make the statement, you could have at least explained why you believe that. If you want to PM me with an answer I'll happily post it here for you.

I can understand things like battling for features, price points and such but when it comes to games I don't think the developers would have put any less effort in had they only one choice of console to work on. In fact, some multi-plat games may even work better for everybody, since everybody would have the same console.

If it's prices you are worried about then that is as much consumer controlled as it is marketing. If the consumer doesn't think something is worth the money they won't buy it, simple as. On the other hand, if popularity of a product dictates a higher price e.g COD maps, how is that different from now?

I'm not saying competition has no merit just that it's not the magical portal to better games/service that some believe.

JsonHenry5052d ago (Edited 5052d ago )

LOL @ it choking the market!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!

Competition is only good for the consumer. There is little to none (if any) downsides for the consumer.

A single platform however has so many downsides it would take several pages to list them all.

+1 to your Marxist stat Chaostar.

denawayne5051d ago

So if a single platform is bad then how many is good? Two, three, ten? I've always said there should be one console that is only restrained by specs. Each manufacturer, i.e. Sony, MS., Nintendo, could do what they want with it in terms of GUI, controller (as long as they have the same amount of inputs), and price point. It should be like a DVD player. Imagine if only Sony DVDs played in only Sony DVD players? How would that be good for the consumer?

Chaostar5051d ago (Edited 5051d ago )

Well, thanks for keeping it classy /s

I keep reading the same thing over and over but nobody has really explained why. If you read the article and my previous comments correctly you'd see that we're not making an argument against competition at all. More trying to point out the merits of a standard in hardware which would shift the competition to publishers and developers.

The only real problem with that (as hicken pointed out below) is companies would just try to secure exclusive content for their brand of universal console. Although I don't know how they would achieve exclusivity if the games work on all consoles.

"A single platform however has so many downsides it would take several pages to list them all."

Go on, give us ten then.

Darth Stewie5052d ago

If it were to happen than the console would be called Skynet.

Dms20125052d ago

Hmm, a MS, Sony, and Nintendo console. Wonder how that would turn out?

WeskerChildReborned5052d ago

Idk, if two groups teamed up, then it would make me wonder how it will end up.

Tone5052d ago

Thats what Trip Hawkins had in mind when he brought about the 3DO.

Capt-FuzzyPants5052d ago

If there was only one console they could just make it really really expensive. Theywouldn't have to worry about competition.

Show all comments (20)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay16d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn217d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn216d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown16d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay16d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay16d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac16d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger16d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300016d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde16d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde16d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
30°

Top Racers Need Top Gear – Introducing the Forza Horizon 6 Limited Edition Controller and Headset

Omar writes: "With the Horizon Festival coming to breathtaking Japan, you’ll need the essential gear to prove you’ve got what it takes to become a Horizon Legend as you cruise, drift and explore an open world full of spectacular driving experiences. That’s why we’re happy to announce the newest Limited Edition Xbox Wireless Controller and Wireless Headset collection, featuring inspired designs from Forza Horizon 6. The bright cyan and lime colorways celebrate the Horizon Festival’s recognition of iconic cars and hit music, with special features that are sure to impress any collector."

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
Killer2020UK23d ago

Oh my, that is one gaudy design

50°

44% of games industry professionals have considered leaving the industry as a result of redundancies

New report from Skillsearch found that 22% of those surveyed had been laid off within the past 12 months.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Cockney26d ago

Well if that 44% left im sure there would be a lot less redundancies