All Channels
Popular
210°

Could Next-Gen Consoles Cost $99?

Analysts say Microsoft's low-priced subscription offer for Xbox 360 could be a Trojan Horse for its Xbox 720 strategy.

Read Full Story >>
xbox360.ign.com
zeeshan5078d ago

Hell no! Even with all that Windows 7 and upcoming Windows 8 money, even Microsoft can't pull a $99 launch and I really doubt this Contract thing is going to work out. May be I am wrong but I just don't see a $99 next gen console even with some sort of contract. Heck the mobile companies charge $199 and upwards) for cellphones that we ALL know carry bloated prices. It's all about profit especially at launch where both the companies already have a bad experience of bleeding money.

Mintyrebel5078d ago

The only way this could even have a sniff at happening is if it was fully cloud based like an onlive system but even the $99 is a push for the big 3!

ALLWRONG5078d ago

"I really doubt this Contract thing is going to work out" that's what they said about cell phones.

Hicken5077d ago

Who said that about cell phones?

Shepherd 2145077d ago (Edited 5077d ago )

Yea screw that, I'll go back to older generation games from the ps3, original xbox and even n64 that I missed for awhile before I'd even consider paying for a monthly plan that will eventually add up to way more than what a brand new console would cost.

However I admit I pay for Live now so if MS just condenses everything into a small monthly payment, it may not matter to LIve subscribers much depending on how much it could cost If they do this.

Still means bad signs for core gaming too.

dcbronco5077d ago

Cellphone companies have been doing it for years. If $199 comes with a two year contract it's no different. But they would have to have a premium service that adds up to more than $60 a year.

But these consoles might be a lot cheaper to make than people think. None of the new console will likely have a separate CPU and GPU. They will most likely be the same die. That cuts the cost of a new console by a third on day one since those are the two most expensive parts. Plus these aren't built with a huge expensive die size. These will be 28 or maybe 22nm chips. They will be far cheaper chips to produce than the ones in the 360 and PS3 at launch.

The cost of consoles drops as the generation goes on because of parts prices being re-negotiated. But mostly from die shrinks. Instead of getting 20 90nm chips from a $100. You get 80 28nm chips from the same wafer for $100(just example numbers). So you can make 4 times the consoles from that wafer.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5077d ago
NoFanboyRequired5078d ago (Edited 5078d ago )

Who knows? Maybe you can have an option on paying in full, or doing the payment plan with the console. I would of course pay in full so its mine right away. But the payment plan would be good for the people who cant afford it in one sitting. I think its a great idea.

SilentNegotiator5078d ago

So....'rent to own'? Yeah, that'll revolutionize things.

/s

Summons755078d ago

yeah and I will be the next president

doogiebear5078d ago

Lord knows that will never happen

Summons755078d ago

lol very true seeing I have 0 interest in politics

5078d ago
5078d ago
Show all comments (32)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
33d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted32d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8532d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele32d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk31d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay31d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 31d ago
Athlon10132d ago (Edited 32d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit31d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg31d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10131d ago (Edited 31d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14932d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
45d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_45d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle45d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker45d ago (Edited 45d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit45d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog45d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_45d ago (Edited 45d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog45d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad45d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_45d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage45d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda45d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

45d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong71d ago

looks god awful on the base systems