All Channels
Popular
160°

No Thanks for No Games, Microsoft

MMGN Summary: Microsoft’s lack of commitment to original exclusives is baffling and disappointing.

The current console generation has introduced and established many new fun, innovative, and otherwise noteworthy exclusive intellectual properties alongside existing heavy-hitters. From the likes of Gears of War to Uncharted, Alan Wake to Heavy Rain, and Crackdown to inFamous, the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 have gone head-to-head over the last six years to win over gamers with their platform’s new and unique gaming experiences.

As the current gen has lasted much longer than previous ones, it is only logical that both companies would use their extended time and assets wisely to appease the fans of both consoles who crave more unique gaming experiences to help them survive the long, harsh hardware winter.

But alas, it’s 2012, and while Sony seems to remain dedicated and focused on bringing exclusives and new IPs to their fans even six years on, Microsoft remains unsure or perhaps content with primarily relying on Halo, Gears, and its Kinect-based affairs to chug along until this gen is over.

Read Full Story >>
360.mmgn.com
AngelicIceDiamond5110d ago (Edited 5110d ago )

In honesty, I know this sounds typical, but Multiplats really keep me satisfied and busy. I really don't have a problem. Halo and Forza look really good, as well as Gears no new Ip line up, But the exclusives are there. Ascend new gods and Day Z (whenever that comes out) Looks very promising I wanna see more on LocoCycle and Ryse soon.

At the moment Multiplats is doing its job keeping me entertained I'm happy honestly its cool with me.

Sony's line up couldn't be more healthier with Last Of Us and Beyond those 2 games that look amazing, and hopefully it turns out great. As well as Sly and GoW prequel next year looks very bright for PS3 owners.

AAACE55110d ago

I kinda get what youre saying, however i abandoned 360 because they lacked variety. Yet i went to ps3, i still find myself playing the multiplat games more. Still works for mebecause i dont have to pay for xbl. But the tradeoff is that games like cod dony look as good on 0s3 as they do on 360. I get kinda jealous when i watch cod on 360 and then play it on ps3. But thats the price i pay.

cobblestone195110d ago

I meant to disagree with you. Just thought I'd let you know.

EVILDEAD3605110d ago

LOL @ another fan blogger article that literally has to pretend that the 360 has zero games on it while supposedly other do.

Heres are the facts..The biggest 4 franchises that have graced the 360 are Halo, Gears, Fable,and Forza..But THESE are not the ONLY exclusives on the 360.

When Micrsoft releases ANY of these franchise Fan Bloggers MUST pretend they don't exist to make their point.

If you were a core 360 gwamer from day one then you know the big games ended up later becoming multi were Mass Effect, Elder Scrolls, Bioshock, Rainbow Six: Vegas, GRAW, etc..

NOTHING has changed EVERY single one of those games still come to the 360 and are supported in a HUGE way by the 360 core. But to make a point NONE of these gamers exist anymore AND Micrsoft should compete AGAINST them instead of supporting the fact that these are what your core want to play.

XBLA has so many amazing experiences on it that it's easy to lose count. Even in the wake of lauded games like my personal fave Shadow Complex,last year's Bastion and the upcoming Dead Light, fan bloggers MUST pretend they don't exist to make their point.

Kinect was released and of course it's biggest two franchise have been Kinect Sports and Dance Central which have both done amazing numbers for a peripheral.

But sibce it's Kinect, these games Don't exist.

Then there is the new IP argument which JUST started the day 'Last of Us' was announced at the VGAs.

Why it's hilarious is that NO major new IPs was released by ANY of the major 3 consoles for 2011..And no matter how the article is pretending there are NO Major NEW IPs coming for the 3 consoles in 2012.

So explain how the 360 has NO games..Oh that's right Witcher 2 (last year's PC champ) and Minecraft (the new XBLA champ)..literally don't exist because umm they were on a PC not a console..PC).

Halo 4 with it's 200-man team simply by the auther is simply just another title. When we all kjnow it's the biggest exclusive of 2012 and will have thousands and thousands on midnight lines in a fervor to play it when it drops in November. Name another game not named Call of Duty that can say that THIS year.

Nah..but it's just umm another Halo..so it does not exist in fan blogger world.

Forza Horizon doesnt exist because CLEARLY it made more sense for Micrsoft to release Banjoo Karting. THEN and ONLY then would the title get ANY recognition.

Fable; The Journey definately doesnt exist because it's Kinect. Although I remember plenty the the usual bloggers allowed to use Sorcery in their argument for the last couple of years.

Bottomline in fanblogger world NO GAMES on the 360 exist, but LOG OFF and guess what? All of those games that getr panned online, all of those games that DON'T exist are being played right now and will be on 360s..the same goes for Sony and Nintendo.

Evil..

Redgehammer5109d ago

@Evil
I agree 100%. I have so many games to play right now on my 360 that it is a chore, sometimes, to decide what type of experience I am looking for, when I am ready to play. Yet, the 360 is somehow lacking and inferior. Maybe I am delusional, but I truly prefer my delusions over the delusions I read, on N4G, daily.

maniacmayhem5109d ago (Edited 5109d ago )

@Evil

110% agree with you.

The 360 is on it's last leg it has been out for 6(?) years now? Its winding down, the proof is out there that MS is gearing up for not only Surface but its next console. Every major console in the past has had the same ramp down near the end of its console cycle. How is this any different?

otherZinc5109d ago

@ EVILDEAD360,

That was an absolute Masterful Piece you wrote!

And I support that writing!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5109d ago
Blacksand15110d ago (Edited 5110d ago )

Your Satisfied? If I had a 360 I would be mad as hell, there not giving use no games but Halo,Forza,Gears and Fable. If I was paying I would call and ask Microsoft what the hell going on here, I need more then Kenect and Smart Glass. I need Games!!!!

Rob Hornecker5110d ago (Edited 5110d ago )

MS and Sony have the same way of thinking and have turned hardcore gaming into to much of a family entertainment hub and not stayed with just having a game console. Thank goodness that there are still 3rd party game companies out there to compensate for both consoles lack of exclusive titles.

We have come along way from the days of a magnovox odessey 2 and every game console in history has tried to turn it into something in wasn't built for.

I have been a hardcore gamer for over 35 years now and will continue to love it till I can't hold a controller anymore!

With the PS4 and Xbox720 right around the corner,it will be interesting to see what will happen in the future. Being that your both alot younger than me,you should let your thoughts on gamings future be heard.

They didn't have web sites,twitter,blogs and the internet when I started gaming. Social media is the best way to let these game console companies know what you want to see.

YOU ARE THE FUTURE!

AngelicIceDiamond5110d ago (Edited 5110d ago )

@BlackSand1 And that's just it, when you go to sites like this, this kind of stuff gets under ppls skin no Ip's and no exclusives and such. But when I shut off the internet and a brand new game gets released like BL2 or AC3 for example. I'm having a great time playing it. I don't think "omg its multiplat its bad" or whatever. I dunno, its hard to explain, I guess its more a personal feeling.

I guess what I'm saying is, when the internet is on, all this no Ip exclusive stuff, I guess "matters" but when the internet shuts off all that goes away and I'm having fun with games with my friends.

glennco5110d ago

it is really just fanboys. everything is black or white with them.

Rob Hornecker5110d ago (Edited 5110d ago )

Oh how true! Having BF3 since its day of release I have spent countless hours playing the VS mode and just recently started the single player.

The xbox/xbox 360 and PS3 took gaming to the next level...The internet! I now can play a game 24/7 with people ALL over the world! There is a big difference between the xbox and 360 as far as the gaming experince itself. The 360 ( as well as the PS3 ) got to family! Censorship has taken alot of the cool Gamer tags I use to know and also killing off there inhouse game development teams. ( Bungie comes to mind )

To me what has killed gaming is to many young kids on XBL/PSN. In these days of me,me,me, foul mouth little spoiled brats has really been a turn off. As Glennco stated the term "fanboy" wouldn't be around if not for them! and there the ones that bitch the most about EVERYTHING!
And I should know because I work with these kids 11 months of the year.

There are some GREAT games out there for both systems that aren't from inhouse game companies...You just have to find them!

Blacksand15110d ago

You right i buy AC3,NCAA,GTA and more I'm just say how these company taking our money but not pleasing us with good games you have a computer for the other stuff, I just won't to play good hardcore games.

gazgriff2k125110d ago

evildead360 we know the games exist we just don't care and are bored to death with the same four exclusive games.

C0MPUT3R5110d ago

Exclusives don't matter. I like paying more for less.

Intentions5110d ago (Edited 5110d ago )

IMO exclusives are only for console sales that's about it. Mainly people play multi-plats anyway, sure I own a 360 (and ps3) and play Halo etc, but i mainly stick with multi plats.

The 360 is doing well for "No Games" ay, otherwise microsoft wouldn't announce halo 4 etc and developing the next gen xbox.

dcbronco5109d ago

Exclusives don't always sell consoles. If they did, the PS3 would have passed the 360 a long time ago. It hasn't because all of those exclusives that fanboys keep talking about haven't made a difference. Gears and Halo have sold more consoles than all of Sony's exclusives combined.

None of Sony's exclusives are a factor in the mainstream. Not many outside of the gaming community knows what Resistance, LBP or InFamous are. But there's a chnce they know what Halo is. They might know Mario or Ms. Pacman. But not Killzone. System movers attract everyone. Sony doesn't have a title like that. With all of the advantages Sony had coming into this generation, they are still behind. And this generation is almost done so that is where they will remain.

ginsunuva5109d ago

Exclusives can take full advantage of a system and its capabilities. Look at Uncharted.

tehpees35110d ago

Halo is a massive seller. Of course Microsoft will use it. They do seem to be under the impression that the core want nothing but Halo, Gears and Forza with a side of Fable and the odd sequel there.

Microsoft have tonnes of games but don't use them.

dcbronco5109d ago

They might be under the impression that it is a small group of people that say exclusives matter. Sales numbers and console sales say that they don't matter.

Sony released four of their biggest exclusives last year. Resistance 3, LBP 2, Killzone 3 and InFamous 2. It should have been a huge year for Sony. Those are some of the titles the fanboys love to brag about. What happened? Xbox outsold the PS3 worldwide for the year.

Exclusives don't matter.

Biggest5109d ago

Barely and for the first year in their shared existence. Microsoft also released their new thing last year which was meant to drive sales through the roof. But while they made a killing during the holiday season they barely beat the PS3. Which would actually point to exclusives meaning a LOT. The PS3 only had exclusives. The 360 had "Like a new console launch". The sales of the Kinect and 360 show that the initial release gave a huge jump that died down. The sales of the PS3 show steady sales and growth with only the original hardware and tons of exclusive games (and that snazzy PS+ program).

dcbronco5107d ago (Edited 5107d ago )

New thing, old thing. It doesn't matter. Sony fans say exclusives matter and that is the difference. But it wasn't. They sold fewer consoles with four of their heavy hitters. It was a six year old console beating the console that supposedly started the generation. There are no excuses. And considering most of those exclusives barely sold any copies, how can you claim they mattered?

SO I agree that new equipment sells consoles. Kinect sold consoles. But Sony exclusives didn't you put all together yourself and still seem to want to avoid acknowledging it. And they are on their second version. PS3 Slim is not the original configuration.

And if by PS+ you mean PSN+, you do realize that is just a way to get you to pay for online multi-player? Ask yourself how much it cost Sony to give you those games that were on the server anyway? Most that they own outright. Others they might have financed or got for cheap. It's no different than MS throwing in Halo: Reach and keeping the price of the Premium $299. It cost them less than $200 to make a Premium. But if a free game gets you to pay an extra hundred, it's great for them.

So things aren't as snazzy as they seem.

Show all comments (45)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio54d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing54d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9254d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit54d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing54d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9254d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay55d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn256d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers56d ago (Edited 56d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn255d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown56d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos56d ago (Edited 56d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay55d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay55d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac55d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger56d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300056d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde56d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood56d ago (Edited 56d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde55d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7557d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_55d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.