All Channels
Popular
140°

Digital Foundry vs. Wii U

It's safe to say that last year's Wii U E3 debut left us with more questions than we had answers. It was clear that Nintendo has once again stepped back from the technological arms race that had cost its competitors billions in losses, and was focusing on controller-driven concept games that it felt had a greater chance of mainstream success. However, at the same time, the console was being released seven years after the debut of Xbox 360, so surely it had to reflect the generational leaps in technology we've seen since then............?

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ProjectVulcan5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

Includes Batman Arkham City screenshot comparison between console platforms:

Wii U: http://images.eurogamer.net...
X360: http://images.eurogamer.net...
PS3: http://images.eurogamer.net...

Wii U: http://images.eurogamer.net...
X360: http://images.eurogamer.net...
PS3: http://images.eurogamer.net...

It does seem Wii U has the edge here in these shots, especially the last set. Maybe it is not significantly faster, but it would have been crazy to launch a machine LESS capable than 360 and PS3, so i doubt that rumour is true after seeing these shots.

Moncole5083d ago

You can see the Wii U has better textures and lighting.

Computersaysno5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

Looks like better implementation of FXAA as well for Wii U, slightly smoother edges. Most noticeable in the arched window frame in the first set, and then the water towers on the left and bottom spikes of the centre building in the second set.

You can see that whole building on the Wii U version is much cleaner and more detailed. Of course Rocksteady have changed quite a bit there which would help, but it does look better.

Its closer in quality to the PC version than the other consoles.

http://images.eurogamer.net... Wii U
http://images.eurogamer.net... PC

DigitalAnalog5083d ago

But no doubt, 6 months is more than enough time to implement final polish, question is, will it run 60FPS?

Boody-Bandit5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

We wont know until the game launches how the WiiU multiplats compare to the PS3 and 360. These shots looks very similar in comparison and in the end that is all they are until we have the final product in hand.

Than we can truly compare frame rates, video tearing, stuttering, slow down, loading, texture loading, pop up, draw distance, etc. That is what is going to determine what the WiiU is capable of while comparing it directly to what will than be several years old technology.

All I am saying is there is a lot more to determine graphical fidelity than screenshots and early demo being compared to full retail versions.

I am on the fence about the WiiU. Their first year line up plus hardware pricing will have to be intriguing for me to want to go out and purchase a console that will be far surpassed in nearly every way with in a years time. Nintendo needs a couple of the true marquee titles and I don't think that's going to happen in the first year.

ProjectVulcan5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

Of course, Rocksteady have a little more time to sort the final version. We have known that Batman AC was gonna be on WiiU for a long time though, so it isn't as if this is a super early build....

PLUS if Wii U was significantly faster, we would surely know it by now. We would surely see it in a game like Arkham City. The shots favour the WiiU version, but they do not show a leap you would EXPECT from a machine that is a lot faster than PS3 or 360.

Be realistic now. You can improve games up until launch, but if there really was a massive gap we WOULD know about it seeing screens and videos. It would be obvious in stuff like ZombieU, Pikmin 3 and this. I can pretty much guarantee right now WiiU is not significantly faster than Ps3 and 360.

The more you look at all WiiU videos and shots, the more obvious and the more it adds up to plainly seeing WiiU is not a next gen powerhouse....

2EHO5083d ago

Seriously we are talking about a demo not even the retail version. Nintendo judt recently got their final dev kits in the hands of developers. So we are gonna have to wait for the 2 wave of games on the console(6-12 months after launch) before we start seeing the true power. That's just for those who wanna nit pick and actually believe this console is only on par with current gen... Which are a lot of gamers who believe that.

Grap5083d ago

you do realize that after 1 year we could see a next gen console. keep in mind what holds PC from next gen game is the current consoles.

Computersaysno5083d ago

It is true. Time to really exploit the system is time Nintendo don't really have if we are expecting brand new machines considerably more powerful in less than 18 months.

Nintendo will unveil their best looking brand new Zelda or Mario title at E3 next year exploiting more power from Wii U.......Just as Microsoft and Sony demo ridiculous looking next gen games on vastly more powerful hardware.

Doh!

ShaunCameron5083d ago

<Just as Microsoft and Sony demo ridiculous looking next gen games on vastly more powerful hardware.>

Yeah. And lose them even more money than the 360 and PS3 did before 2009-2010. Given Sony's current situation, I don't know if they're even in any position to do that.

Computersaysno5083d ago (Edited 5083d ago )

So ShaunCameron you think Sony and Microsoft will go for weak next gen machines then, that aren't next gen? Neither of them will build a fairly powerful machine despite seeing what UE4 can do?

Don't be crazy. Of course at least one of them will build a machine faster than 360 and PS3 and no doubt Wii U, quite a lot faster i bet.

Look at Vita for more evidence, did Sony change their plan? Build a cheap low tech machine?

No, they went mad yet again. Wake up- they are far more likely to build a powerful next gen machine!

5083d ago
2EHO5083d ago

You guys are expecting way more than what's going to be coming. Next gen is going to be a lot closer than you think. But you will have to wait and see. It won't matter for graphics whores they will point out a jaggie on a blade of grass as proof a system is underpowered.

50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7740d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer65d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi64d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure63d ago (Edited 63d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer65d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot64d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box64d ago (Edited 64d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno64d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay64d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno63d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK63d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)