All Channels
Popular
260°

What to Expect From Sony at E3 2012

PS3Center.net writes: "Here’s what you can expect from Sony’s E3 conference this year, will a PSThree slim be at the expo? Or will Agent be shown?"

Read Full Story >>
ps3center.net
NastyLeftHook05122d ago (Edited 5122d ago )

(games)
1. the last of us
2. god of war ascension
3. kingdom hearts collection
4. agent
5. guirella games new ip
6. 3 new ip's

(hardware features)
1. new ps+ news.
2. possible slimmer ps3.
3. perhaps a price cut.

( handheld)

1. new ip's
2. new features
3. new apps

(move)

1. a couple new games
2. some new features to use ps move in the menus.

(wish list)

1.ps4 (metal gear solid 5 bundle coming christmas '12.

LOGICWINS5122d ago

I'm most excited for GG's new IP or Killzone 4. I need something new to play with my Sharpshooter!

Chitown712915122d ago

I want Sony to make a shooting game with head tracking for the move. That would be so beast!!!

LOGICWINS5122d ago

I played the demo for R3 and its not for me. Resistance favors filling the opposition with as many bullets as possible till they fall. Kinda one dimensional combat, with the exception of the unique weapons. In Killzone, patience and accuracy wins the day. And compared to KZ3, the physics engine in R3 is garbage.

TheFirstClassic5122d ago (Edited 5122d ago )

Um, I REALLY disagree with you about Resistance 3. The areas in the game usually have ways to flanks enemies, you always have to be mindful of where the health packs are, and the creative weapons and different types of enemies offers a lot more strategy than Killzone 3 does. I love Killzone for the multiplayer, but Resistance just had one of the best shooter campaigns of this gen.

Can't say I disagree about the physics engine, not that it makes the game. Killzone really has that down.

Muffins12235122d ago

Killzone 4 should not be made by GG or not made at all,cause it would be financially shitty for sony,due to them losing money every killzone game.Even though im going to get disagrees on this,the last 2 had some pretty low sale numbers

LOGICWINS5122d ago (Edited 5122d ago )

Your right. Killzone 3 sold less than Killzone 2 within the same time period. I'm happy Killzone games are still in the works though. I'm assuming that GG will try to make a HUUUUGE impression this time around considering that so many people felt that KZ3 wasn't worth buying.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5122d ago
xursz5122d ago

Add The Last Guardian and Quantic Dream's project on there and you've got my agree.

morganfell5122d ago (Edited 5122d ago )

Sony purchase of Gaikai and new deal with Nvidia as part of purchase

First look at Dust 514 on Vita

Infamous 3 for PS3/Vita

Syphon Filter for PS3/Vita

Exclusive Bioshock title on Vita

Call of Duty on Vita

Assassin's Creed 3 on PS3/Vita

Splinter Cell 6 on PS3/Vita

Gran Turismo Vita

MGS5 for PS3/Vita

Revamped Warrior's Lair for PS3/Vita

God of War Ascension on PS3/Vita

Dead Space 3 on PS3 /Vita

The Getaway 2 for Vita

SOCOM 2 HD for PS3/Vita

Full remote play for Vita

New Eat Sleep Play title announced

Massive number of reduced titles announced for PS+ members

New Sony Santa Monica title with Stig Asmussen

PlayStation All Stars Battle Royale for PS3/Vita

StrongMan5122d ago

Agent
The Last of Us
Sly Cooper 4
The Last Guardian
New Quantic Dream game(makers of Heavy Rain)
New Guerrilla Games game(makers of Killzone)
God of War: Ascension
LittleBigPlanet Karting
PlayStation All Stars Battle Royal
Syphon Filter 5
Infamous 3
Jak & Daxter 4
The Getaway 2
8 Days
A few new IP announcements
Some new VITA announcements
New PS+ features
New apps
Cloud gaming

BrutallyBlunt5122d ago

Not gonna happen. Vita will take about half the show because Sony knows there needs to be a major push for that device. Talking about the PS4 would be disastrous because they still need to make money on Vita and the PS3 is still over $200. I expect a price drop on the PS3 and bundles on Vita. The downside will be the Move. Sony still won't stand behind the product as much as they should have early on and there will be very little support, especially for games that require it.

Sony will show lots of PS3 games, more than that for games on Vita. I am hoping the rumours of Gaikai or Onlive are true.

BitbyDeath5122d ago

Sony will no doubt be showing a ton of games for Vita but really if Sony were that worried about sales all they'd have to mention is two words.

"Price Cut"

I know it seems bleak that the PS4 will show but Nintendo releasing already should force their hand to at least make mention of something.

Hopefully all 3 will at least mention their next console.

PS. Not caring for onLive as it probably wouldn't work down here in Australia, best connection i can get at this time is a 20mb. And once that reaches my PC it's around 10-12mb and once it reaches my PS3 it's around 4-7mb.
So not something i'd care for.

BrutallyBlunt5122d ago

I'll have to disagree on a price cut for Vita. The device is already being sold at a loss and they had projected a timeline to break even. Cutting the price this early would not spell confidence in the product. It worked for Nintendo because the system was overpriced to begin with and the biggest marketing campaign was about the 3D that many didn't seem to care about. There is nothing wrong with Vita aside from requiring a memory card that adds to the overall cost. Include a 4GB card and create valued bundles, that's what I'd do.

BitbyDeath5122d ago

It's not being sold at a loss, as it only costs $160 to make.

http://vita.ign.com/article...

They are currently profiting off each device sold.

BrutallyBlunt5122d ago

http://www.engadget.com/201...

It also states it only costs $100 to make a 3DS. What you forget is the costs associated with that device from marketing, manufacturing and everything else.

http://www.examiner.com/art...

Kaz Hirai stated long ago about Vita being sold at a loss initially.

BitbyDeath5122d ago

Ok, i stand corrected.
Bubs for proving me wrong :-)

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5122d ago
yesmynameissumo5122d ago

A whole lotta badassery across PS3, PSN, PS+ and PS Vita fronts.

NBT915122d ago (Edited 5122d ago )

Disappointment

Honestly, I dont know why people are expecting so much from E3 this year

gaffyh5122d ago

Probably because we're all hoping that the Wii U will push MS and Sony to show more than usual.

NBT915122d ago

Maybe, but I mean they didnt really show much of the WiiU last time, and we already know that Vita can in theory do the same tricks that the WiiU can ( being used as a input device, proper remote play etc).

I would love to be proven wrong, but E3 has been so lacklustre for a few years running now that im not really feeling the hype for it, then again its the unexpected announcements that make a good E3 so by not going into it with much in mind I will prolly be blown away =D

BitbyDeath5122d ago

Same reason people hope for good Xmas presents :-p

Show all comments (43)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
42d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted42d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8542d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele41d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk41d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay41d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 41d ago
Athlon10142d ago (Edited 42d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit41d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg41d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10141d ago (Edited 41d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14941d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
55d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_55d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle54d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker55d ago (Edited 55d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit54d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog55d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_55d ago (Edited 55d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog55d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad55d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_55d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage55d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda54d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

55d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong81d ago

looks god awful on the base systems