120°

PS3 vs. Xbox 360: video services compared

The console wars have faded into the background, but two of the protagonists, the Xbox and the PlayStation, are still fighting it out to be more than just a games console, but also an integral part of your home-theatre set-up.

Unless one of the major console-exclusive titles is launched — we're looking at you, Gran Turismo 5 and Halo — or a game geek starts a flame war about which console produces better textures, no one really pays attention to the ongoing war.

That's because many of us have picked a side or taken an each-way bet, and are happy with what we've got. But for those who have yet to add a current-generation games console to their home-entertainment set-up, Microsoft and Sony figure that a plethora of entertainment options are likely to be as tempting as a few exclusive game titles — and possibly even more so.

hennessey865080d ago

It has far better streaming quality, it is also faster. I have both my PS3 and 360 wired so they both are equal yet the PS3 is so slow to load anything

KyRo5080d ago (Edited 5080d ago )

Sounds like you need to check your internet settings mate.

I only use Netflix so I can't speak for LoveFilm but I use it on both consoles and both only take about 5 seconds, 10 maximum to load and that's with my PS3 using a wireless connection.

stage885080d ago

I have to agree, can't speak for other services but Netflix is far superior on PS3. I get horrible streaming quality on the 360.

Gamer19825080d ago

I agree I have both 360 and ps3 and stuff like skyplayer is unusable on 360. Yet netflix works perfect on ps3 even in HD. Games online works fine on 360 though so its not my net i'm guessing thats more skys problem. As for load times the PS3 starts faster especially if you use Kinect (Kinect takes anohter 5-8 seconds on top of consoles to boot!).

portal_25080d ago

5 years of consistent media playback says otherwise, but nice try trolling saddo.

bahabeast5080d ago

i dnt see how you could say 360 wins when u hav 2 pay twice and is exact same on ps3 wii pc ios android all free

black9115080d ago

3d bluray player, and web browser to stream live shows & movies free. Also ps3 webrowser has PS3youtube which allows you to watch all youtube videos in HD aswell as download them to your Hard Drive. Their are hundreds of sites like this on the PS3.

mcstorm5080d ago (Edited 5080d ago )

It all depends on how you use them depends on which is the best. I find I use my 360 for BBCI Player, 4OD, C5OD, Netflix, Youtube, Skyplayer and zune. I use the PS3 for streaming movies from my HomeServer as it seems to streem my HD files better and I have sony sync so my tv will control my PS3 and I also use the PS3 in the back for Playtv.

Its all personal choice to be honest and which works best for you as they both have + and - points.

gamer78045080d ago

This one has to go to the 360. Sure alot of their services are the same but xbox 360 has voice and gesture support. Xbox also has zune, which allows you to download your videos as well as stream

Xbox 360 also does better streaming through the pc with support for HD-Surround and windows media center and its tv files etc.

Xbox 360 will soon be getting a web browser.

Sure you have to pay for xbox live gold, but we aren't talking cost here, we are talking end result.

Show all comments (13)
40°

15 Years Ago, Mortal Kombat (2011) Saved Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise

A brutal reset, a smarter story, and a return to what made it great—Mortal Kombat (2011) revived the series.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
italiangamer7d ago

"Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise"

Press X to (seriously) doubt.

DarXyde5d ago

Underrated comment. I used to hate that game so much that any time my siblings asked me to play it, I just picked Hom and shut myself down mid-match.

Soy5d ago

And then MK1 killed it again.

DivineHand1255d ago (Edited 5d ago )

15 years went by so fast. I remember playing through the story mode at launch.

90°

PlayStation legend Shuhei Yoshida says Jim Ryan fired him because he didn't listen to him

Why did Sony push Shuhei Yoshida out of his role leading PlayStation's first-party games? He'd overseen some huge successes. Well, apparently, he didn't listen.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Relientk777d ago

Yeah I can see that for sure. Shuhei Yoshida should have been in charge not Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga7d ago

It should be free highway for him now.. but Sony are too stupid to see this, especially that moron Hulst

S2Killinit6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Wtf why all that anger. PlayStation is dominating on every level. Besides I think there is a little more to hiring a CEO than just who is available. Its not like its a athlete your team wants to buy.

neutralgamer19926d ago

S2Killinit

live service failures, chasing trends, closing studios. yes dominating

Cacabunga6d ago

Sony is Dominating because competition is not existing. Compared to previous gens this is the poorest in terms of software offerings.

Last gen we got Uncharted 4 Lost Legacy and TLOU2 from ND alone.

This is so far a remasters gen, with no competition to lift up the quality

1nsomniac6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

..."PlayStation is dominating on every level"....

...Really???

PlayStation are soon heading into a new generation in the not to distant future. They currently have the worst customer satisfaction they've ever sustained as a company. The company is heading for a huge crash while at the same time they'll need to be planning how they are going to try and win back that favour and the build up to their new releases.

Yes financially they're winning but they're going to have to ride out this complete public corporate disaster. No one has faith in the company or the product anymore. They've damaged their public image so much this generation. Greed can kill anyone.

medman6d ago

Hulst is a disaster......

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6d ago
blacktiger6d ago

He would've done the same thing and fire Jim Ryan and Shuhei would be the villain. Why?
Because Elite creates the narrative and distraction for gamers, users and citizens.

Outside_ofthe_Box7d ago

More confirmation that Jim Ryan is the culprit for what has happened to Sony. Hulst needs to go too. What sucks is that a lot of the good top heads at Sony are no longer there. I wish that guys that were forced out prematurely by Dumbo Jimbo like Shuhei and Layden came back.

robtion6d ago

Yep. Yoshida was responsible for bringing one of the best games of this generation to playstation (Stellar Blade). He is an actual gamer and is in touch with what gamers want (creative, fun games, not GaaS and agenda pushing). He also seems like a genuinely nice guy if you watch some interviews. Of course they got rid of him.

darthv727d ago

Makes you wonder if MS even thought about hiring him after Phil and Sarah were leaving. He certainly couldn't make their situation any worse.

Agent756d ago

Microflop. After Windows XP and Xbox 360, it all went floppy.

S2Killinit6d ago

Floppy 😆
No pun intended

badz1497d ago

Yoshida for President! Jim Ryan was and always be a hack! Sony should get Shu back

Lightning777d ago

All the gamer/consumer lead heads are gone across PS and Xbox. shuhei gone phil's gone (questionable) but gone. The future of gaming is somewhat uncertain across the board.

Show all comments (30)
50°

Ex-Naughty Dog Dev: Big Studios Are 'Forced' to Hire Like Factories

Former Naughty Dog artist Gabriel Betancourt explains why the "sweet spot" for game teams is under 200 people and how AAA "factories" kill creativity.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
6d ago
phongtro123_com6d ago

There’s definitely some truth to this. When teams get too large, coordination starts to outweigh creativity—layers of approval, risk aversion, and tight deadlines can turn bold ideas into “safe” ones. Keeping a team under ~200 people sounds ideal for maintaining clear communication and a shared vision. That said, massive AAA projects also come with huge technical demands and expectations, so scaling up isn’t always avoidable. The real challenge is figuring out how to keep that small-team creativity alive inside big studio structures.

DarXyde6d ago

More than that, it's logistically untenable. Inevitably, when teams get too large, how do you keep tabs on accountability? I suspect this massive team size is a consequence of the perfectionism streak Naughty Dog has.

I wish we could have so many people working on something and it turns out great because I'm all for collaboration in spirit - the problem is too many people as part of the larger team and smaller units. Suppose for example that you have too many people in the art department; you will very often come up against fiercely competing visions for how things should look. That competitive vision will cause friction between team members, team doesn't work as a unit, the back and forth can further delay parts that the other departments are waiting for, etc etc.

A 200-person team says, to me, that we need to scale back game development. Even if it means we go back to PS2 era costs and scale, why not? Those games are still great fun, the budgets were in check, and you could literally break the 200-man team into like 10 20-man teams working on different projects.