Product-Reviews writes: We’ve seen a lot of talk on message boards on how this could in fact ‘replace’ the PS4, with Gaikai teaming up with Sony to offer the masses of PS3 users an easy ‘upgrade’ to the next generation of games, without even having to buy any new hardware. It is an ambitious plan to say the least, but one which would be pretty amazing if they could pull it off.
For Southeast Asia, new price changes.
Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.
Replies(1)Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses
Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price
LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?
One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?
If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.
The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.
War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact
The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.
Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.
Replies(2)I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.
I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.
Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.
This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.
There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.
I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.
I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.
But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.
Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.
Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.
How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?
If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection
Replies(2)Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.
Not really bothered about the price, I would still prefer a shiny new console to add to the collection, over non-hardware cloud streaming any day. My internet connection isn't exactly one to boast about either.. lol.
Cloud gaming would add value to the PS3, but should only be an extra, thanks to Sony needing to focus on physical games primarily.
I thought Gaikai was an advertising group. They stream game demos and tell you where to buy the full game.
From Wikipedia
Gaikai is a cloud-based gaming service that allows users to play demos via the cloud and purchase full versions of major PC games and applications instantly from a webpage or internet-connected device.
Users are not forced to navigate to an online portal in which they have to register to be able to access the games and do not need to download any software. At the end of the demo, the customer is given the option to purchase the game or product from a local retailer, online store or direct-to-drive download service.
I am sure all this has been mentioned before on here.
They'll be kidding themselves if they think Cloud gaming will replace anything. People should start looking at this in a positive light. For example:
If Sony partnered with Gaikai, they could stream PS4 demos to the PS3 (among many other things they could use with the PS3 now). Why would this be worth it? When the PS4 does end up coming out, lots of gamers won't make that jump. So giving them constant access to every demo released for the PS4 will show them what they're missing. You'll be able to play PS4 game demos on the PS3, but need the PS4 itself to actually play the full games. Making the PSN even more connected across platforms.
If this was used properly, you could effectively play any game demo from any one of their consoles on any Sony platform. It could even be used to demo Vita games on PS3/4.
I think this is fantastic, and I'm excited to see more.
Not understanding how people are worrying about this impacting PS4 sales, and not be concerned about the XBox 360's cablebox app not effecting the Next Box. Especially when MS is aiming that app at causal gamers.
If they already have it in the current system, most just aren't going to want the next one.