All Channels
Popular
Oh great profit ABizzel1

ABizzel1

Contributor
CRank: 6Score: 263290

User Review : Left 4 Dead 2

Ups
  • Still great co-op{Better and more weapons{New infected add even more stratgey to the game
Downs
  • Still short{Playing solo is a no no{Should have been DLC

Left 4 Dead 2 to soon?

If you played the original Left 4 Dead and loved it, then you should feel right at home with Left 4 Dead 2.

Left 4 Dead 2 features a complete set of new scenarios along with more infected, new weapons, melee weapons, a new mode, and other items you can use to help you survive the swarms of zombies.

Once again a group of 4 survivors try to make it out of the city alive, as swarm after swarm of zombies attack them. But the main question is how much has Left 4 Dead 2 changed since part 1 which came out last year. Short answer: Not much.

It's pretty much the exact same game with slightly better graphics, a new mode, a few more weapons, melee weapons, new infected, and new ammo which sounds like a lot, but once you play through your first scenario the newness is lost, and it feels like the same old Left 4 Dead (which can be a good or bad thing).

But there are new things so let's talk about them.

First melee weapons give you an that little fighting power you need if you run out ammo or if you want to bash a zombie in the skull with a bat or katana without having to worry about accidentally getting bit and becoming one yourself. Melee weapons don't push the game to the next level, but they are a welcome addition.

All the old infected return (The Boomer (aka Gabe Newell), the Tank, The Witch, The Smoker, and the Hunter) with a group of new friends. The new infected are The Charger (basically a weaker version of the Tank), The Spitter (basically a skinny female Boomer that spits acid on the ground), and The Jockey (jumps on players and steers them away from the group).

All the previous modes return as well (Campaign, Versus, and Survival) along with the new mode Scavenger. In it survivors collect gas canisters in order to keep the generators running while player controlled infected attack the survivors.

Yeah that's pretty much it.

If you wanted to try Left 4 Dead out, but didn't, then Left 4 Dead 2 is your chance. It's still short, but it's still one of the best co-op experiences on the Xbox 360 (and the PC as well). Left 4 Dead 2 isn't the greatest game ever, but it is fun which is what matters in the end.

Score
9.0
Graphics
Easy and fun. Controls take a quick second to get use to if you're new to the game, but if you played the first game, you should be right at home.
8.5
Sound
Once again developers on the 360 need to get new engines. Left 4 Dead 2 looks good, but the environments look very simple.
8.5
Gameplay
Cheap scary movie music, which fits the game perfectly. Sound effects sound good as well.
9.0
Fun Factor
On you own it's a 7/10, online which is how you should play it it's a ^.
9.0
Online
4 player online co-op (up to 2 players can play on one console), Versus mode, and Survival are still as fun as ever and Scavenge is a nice addition to an already great online experience.
Overall
8.8
5971d ago
70°

Top Horde Shooters Your Squad Should Play

The Guide Hall explores the top horde shooters that co-op fans should be playing this year before the upcoming launch of Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2!

Read Full Story >>
theguidehall.com
190°

15 Xbox Games That Should Make the Multiplatform Jump

While there’s likely already a list behind closed doors, one can still speculate and offer logical suggestions for titles new and old that should find their way into the PlayStation and Switch libraries.

Read Full Story >>
technabob.com
GamerRN787d ago

Single A games and live service games. Those make sense

S2Killinit787d ago

None of it makes sense. But its happening.

Ps5conehead787d ago

That’s up to Microsoft they want return on there investment. From buying up those publishers. That’s what there in business for. And they made a mistake putting day one exclusive on game pass. So now Microsoft wants to profit any way they can.its called buisness . Just like Sony putting games on pc a year are two after ps5 launch.
So if they can make money off PlayStation and Nintendo. They will do that. And I bet soon real soon they will release some aaa exclusives .and I bet one day it will be same day release

TheEroica787d ago

Sony gamers begging for Xbox games.... Who would've thunk it?

BISHOP-BRASIL787d ago

Yeah, because random site off the internet represents all Sony gamers, they have the letter of attorney and all...

S2Killinit787d ago

Lol what a spin. You dizzy?

AsunaYuukiTheFlash786d ago (Edited 786d ago )

We don’t care about shovelwares. Get that junk out of PS5

StormSnooper786d ago

More like MS begging to put their games on PlayStation.

TheEroica785d ago

Keep begging Sony gamers!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 785d ago
Friendlygamer787d ago

Some of these seem to be exclusive for lack of enthusiasm of the publisher rather than because of deals. A lot of cool indies skip ps for some reason like katana zero, el paso, elsewhere and gunbrela

S2Killinit787d ago

Even more indies skip xbox. We know that right?

Friendlygamer787d ago

Quality over quantity, Microsoft got some really interesting and curated niche games on their machines, maybe in part because of gamepass

S2Killinit787d ago

Quality and MS are not things you bring up in same sentence.

shinoff2183787d ago (Edited 787d ago )

Alot of indies skip xbox to. It goes round and round. Personally I think your off base on that but no need to have the argument.

Friendlygamer787d ago

Between katana zero, valheim, Battletech, el passo... I don't feel off base. maybe ps got a million of light novel games that will never release on Xbox but like I've said, I'm talking about niche games highlights, the 10%.

  Heck, it's probably thanks to Microsoft that the s.t.a.l.k.e.r games came to console ps included, meanwhile Sony backwards compatibility continues to be extremely anemic.

And I'm sure most ps5 users are happy to ignore these games and just play wathever new 3rd person action game is trending but it's cool that Microsoft gives some love to smaller audiences and software preservation

shinoff2183787d ago

Again your off base just to be snide. All it's showing though is your ignorance.

One light novels wtf is that even. Ps has plenty of pretty damn good indies.

Speaking of indies and ms being responsible. You know F.I.S.T. of course you do alot of you guys just support gamepass. Well here's a history of Sony being responsible for helping indies. Look up the China project from Sony.

Lastly lol your ignorance showing again. Sony has plenty of games. Personally third person is better then first anyway but that's besides the point. Sony gets so many games that xbox doesn't get because yall don't support the games. Jrpgs being a great example. I personally am not into every Sony first party game. Alot of us aren't. On the other side you don't get to eat often so you gobble up everything. Me personally God of War not my cup, etc. For me I'm into jrpgs and ms just can't touch Sony on those. Again because the Xbox base doesn't support it. Devs dont wanna waste their time or money. Hit me up when falcom develops a game over there.

Speaking of third person narrative games. Aren't yall drooling over hellblade 2. The first one was Sony exclusive at one point. Another not my cup game. Showing we don't have to fall in line and agree we love everything Sony puts out. The facts are they sell though unlike elsewhere(not nintendo)

StormSnooper786d ago

You are same person as GamerRN, yes?

Abnor_Mal787d ago

They really think PlayStation fans would want to play Redfall? Pfft.

Personally nothing on that list would be any game I’d want to play.

TwoPicklesGood787d ago

I’d absolutely love Hellblade 2, Palworld, and Quantum Break on ps5 as I’m sure tons of others would too. There’s nothing wrong with wanting games from another console and its sad that people try to act like they aren’t interested in them.

shinoff2183787d ago

While indont agree with the games. I agree with the point. Your not wrong.

DarXyde787d ago

Sunset Overdrive makes very good sense. Palworld might.

Don't know about the others. Hellblade II does make sense given the original launched on PS4 first. Quantum Break was a massive letdown for me. I absolutely hated the whole TV show thing and I don't think anyone should have to relive that on modern hardware.

Show all comments (31)
170°

Valve Made Left 4 Dead 2 Because The First Game Was A Broken Mess

Left 4 Dead lead Chet Faliszek describes the original Left 4 Dead game as "such a broken thing that nobody wanted to touch it."

ZycoFox899d ago

And then couldn't be arsed to make a third game.

If they can add a lot more stuff to a 2nd game in just 1 year why didn't they make a third game a few years later with tons of stuff extra? Because that shows they could've.

I know Source 2 was kind of broken and was a reason they cancelled L4D3 but it seems wasteful to just toss it away.

Don't know what Valve were thinking.. it's like nobody wanted to fix the issues to get going. They certainly aren't the Valve of 2004 that released fun games with pretty cutting edge graphics.

cthulhucultist897d ago

Valve is allergic to number 3 it seems. It would be easier for them to release a Left 4 Dead 2.5 enhanced version instead of releasing a game with "3" slapped on its title.

rakentaja896d ago

They stopped making games a long time ago. Steam brings in so much money that it's really not worth the effort. Nowadays, people only look for faults in games, and spend more time whining on Twitter/X than playing the game anyway. Valve says a big fat no-no.

anast897d ago

Value is the Blockbuster of video games. They have no need to invest in deving a game, when they can make handfuls of cash renting them.

-Foxtrot899d ago

What are they talking about? Seemed pretty alright to me at launch it just wasn't supported the way Valve promised us

They should have just worked on a revamp / massive update to the game but they didn't they jumped straight to a sequel with brand new characters despite having some sort, if small, story about where the original survivors were heading.

I didn't care for the direction they took the sequel, the original games tone and atmosphere was missing in the second game and is still unmatched. Daytime levels, more whackiness, melee weapons where you could attack a Tank with a frying pan...just wasn't the same to be honest and the new survivors just didn't hold up the originals.

Here's my speculation. I think they did a sequel because they didn't want to update a game co-developed by Turtle Rock, they wanted the franchise to be known as a Valve game only and knew if they updated the first one Turtle Rocks name would still linger on it.

shaenoide897d ago

I want broken games like L4D all day long...

GhostScholar897d ago

Well the first game was by far the best

Show all comments (12)