All Channels
Popular
-_______________________-

jidery

Contributor
CRank: 8Score: 46960

User Review : Gran Turismo 5

Ups
  • The game is a technical marvel
  • Racing is better than ever
  • Premium cars
Downs
  • Filled with graphical problems
  • Promised too much
  • Feels rushed

GT5 is a mixed bag, but does it live up to longtime fans expectations?

GT5, is a difficult game to review. Never before have I played with so much content, and so many features, that I have gone months playing the single player, and could easily go for a few months more. The multiplayer only adds to the length of this extremely feature packed game. In this review I will attempt to critique most aspects of the game.

Lets start with a little history of me and the GT series. I have been a follower of the game since the PS1 days, starting with Gran Turismo 1. It was pretty good, but was not what I had expected, and felt more like an arcade game. Moving onto the second it vastly improved the career mode, to the point it needed 2 disks. I was very happy with the changes and improvements in the second, but I still felt this game wasn’t what I wanted.

That all changed in the PS2 era. GT3 brought a much needed graphical improvement, and some much needed features. I was very happy with the way the series was going. The biggest jump for me has to be Gran Turismo 4, featuring the best graphics ever seen on the PS2, and one of the best career modes to go along with it. The world map was my favorite part, and the seer amount of events and cars was mind boggling.

With the release of GTPSP, I was greatly disappointed, and had a feeling that the series has reached its peak, the game felt very rushed, and had some horrid design choices that made me go, what were they thinking? With the release of GT5, that all changed.

*I have not finished the game, up until this point I have not reviewed a game until I finished it. I am currently level 28/40*

From the startup of GT5 I was greeted with the option to install, at first I skipped it because I didn’t want to wait. It wasn’t long before I realized how needed the install actually was, the loading screens were long, and took forever. I decided to bite the bullet and wait the 60+ minutes to install the game. Once that was over with the loading times were greatly increased, and the game felt much smoother.

The career mode is not what I expected from GT5, coming from GT4 I expected it to be like a world map, but instead I was greeted with simple menus that look shinny. I was a little disappointment by the linearity of the game, and the lack of the world map, though I see why they chose this direction. To me the world map is a feature that will be missed.

The events are the same as in previous game, you need to use a car that’s within the events restrictions and get first place. Surprisingly this formula still works to this day, and I still have a blast racing on the tracks. The story mode progresses through an all new level up system, and racing provides exp. and money now. The addition of exp. provides a more linear experience than the previous game, but also provides more rewards for racing.

The game moves on to a new direction with the series to mix the standard formula up a bit by providing the new special events. To me special events provide a challenge that no GT game has given before. I love the idea of being forced to win a race with hard tires on, or go around the world on a world tour to earn photo mode locations. It really mixes things up from the standard GT formula. Although the special events are a great addition to the game, I feel they are over too quickly, and the game could have used some more.

License tests are still in GT, and to me they have always been the low point of any GT game. The great thing is the requirement has been removed, so you don’t have to do them to race. Removing the requirement makes me happy, but now there is hardly any incentive to actually do them. The exp. they provide is so little compared to race events, and the cars they reward are dull and boring, making the license tests hardly something anyone would want to complete. The good thing is you don’t have too anymore.

B-spec has always seemed like a pointless feature to me in GT4, so I was not too happy with its return in GT5. When I tried it out in GT5 I was quite surprised and found it to be much more enjoyable than I expected. Splitting A-spec and B-spec into two different level up systems makes it feel like you’re not cheating your way to the max level and better cars like in GT4. B-spec is something I want to do now thanks to an improved UI and the addition of special reward cars for doing it. Though the promised online B-spec mode is still missing, this has me a little disappointed.

The AI in B-spec has to be the low point of the improved mode. While they can drive around the track, it is very common for them to make dumb moves, or spend a long time trying to pass someone. It gets to the point where it is frustrating to deal with my bob. The AI gets better as you level them up, but it’s never enough to not be frustrating.

GT5 also marks the return of Photo mode, which is better than ever. The cars looks fantastic, and truly show their stuff in this mode. I have zoomed close to headlights to read the text around the bulb clearly, it’s that accurate. The environments for the car are also outstanding, and nearly match their real life location. The lack of being able to bring standard cars into photo mode is disappointing, but understandable.

Online is a nice addition to GT5, I feel its how online in a racer should be done. There is content for everyone, rooms with racing going on, and room with people just hanging out talking about cars. I have made many friends online and met some really cool people. The community is great and fun, and is what I expect from a racing game. There are some small issues such as the community is forced to put restrictions on to prevent asshats from joining with an X1 when everyone else is driving RX7’s.

I feel like it could have used dedicated servers, but rather PD has chosen to go the hosts route, while not always bad, there are some rooms filled with lag issues. I guess we PS3 gamers have been spoiled with dedicated servers for too long in all our exclusives, that we are just used to nearly perfect connections.

Going even deeper into GT5 we can find many customization options. Your GT Life page is a portal where people can post comments and view your latest accomplishments. While a great feature, not enough people use it. I feel like it could have been integrated with another service, such as PSN. A feature like this should be for more than one game, too many games these days try to make a community system that people just don’t use.

Customization of the cars is a lot like older GT games, but slightly more limiting. For instance, you can no longer customize individual gear ratios of a car, and are forced to customize a simple top speed adjustment. The addition of new things such as springs is a nice touch.

The addition of items is minor and not something I feel too excited about. Receiving a random horn sound every 10 cars is cool and all, but gets old fast. PD also allows you to paint your premium cars any color you have obtained. The requirement to obtain the paint colors now makes it easier to have a unique car color, as if you get matte purple and paint your car that color, it is unlikely you will ever see that car in the same color when playing online.

There are some additional features that feel pointless, such as eye support. Head tracking is cool, but beyond the few races I tried it in, It felt pointless. I have yet to try 3D, but I expect similar feelings as I had with head tracking.

From a technical standpoint, GT5 is both astonishing and disappointing. Under some conditions, such as driving a premium car on London, the game looks better than any racing game on the market, and debatable any game released. Then you go and drive a standard car on trial mountain, and you feel like you’re playing GT4 all over again.

That has to be my main issue with GT5, standard and premium cars. Standard cars look fine in most cases, but don’t have that glamor premium cars have. Premium cars are so detailed that my mind is blown every time I take them into photo mode. The lack of standard cars having cockpit view is very disappointing, and reminds me of playing GT4. Standard and Premium also seem to go beyond the cars and extend to the tracks also. There are some amazing tracks that look photorealistic, such as London and Monza, then there are some disappointments like Laguna Seca, and Trial Mountain.

The new lighting effects are great and are what I expected from PD. Shadows are sadly disappointing, filled with jaggies half the time. Jaggies are also noticeable with smoke and dust effects. I really feel like PD could have greatly benefited with the use of MLAA. Not only would MLAA provide jaggieless gameplay, it would also allow for better textures and visuals by not using as much processing power. Screen tearing is also very noticeable, and a little distracting.

The improved physics engine really adds to the game. The cars feel very realistic, and are almost exact to the real life counter parts. My in game Miata shifts at the exact same time I do in real life, and takes turns at similar speeds, it’s that accurate. The audio is also impressive, the engine noises no longer sound like vacuums, and sound like their car alternative.

The AI to me is an improvement to the series, but still disappoints. They do get much better as you go through the game, yet still I get hit when I spin out when they had plenty of time to avoid me, and they still get in the way. I like how they do make mistakes sometimes, however they still feel like robots.

It’s hard to say whether or not GT5 lived up to my expectations. I expected a perfect game, coming from a developer than thrives on perfection, but I got a game that feels incomplete. The game does however make up for its incompleteness through great and addicting gameplay, and the sheer amount of content. Giving the game a single score was a very difficult thing for me to do, as its mostly a mixed bag.

You see, I can’t give GT5 a 9, I just can’t. The game is missing too much for me to consider it an outstanding game. As much as I love the series I still have a hard time giving it a great score because of the disappointment’s. Perhaps I am being too hard on PD and expecting too much. As a long time follower of GT5, and the GT series, I have high expectations for the GT series.

The funny thing is, despite all the disappointments, the game still remains in my PS3 to this day. I still play it every day I can, and don’t see a time that I plan to stop playing it. What the game lacks, whether it be features, graphics, gameplay, etc. it makes up for greatly by being a fun game. Is it perfect? No its not, but it is more than deserving of a good score.

Good Job PD, and thanks for a great game.

-Jidery

Score
8.0
Graphics
At times I am playing the most beautiful game on consoles, other times I am playing an upscaled PS2 game.
9.0
Sound
A huge improvement to the series.
8.5
Gameplay
The game is full of content that keeps giving. Some things feel repetitive, and it lacks the world map of the previous game, making things more linear.
10.0
Fun Factor
Its fun, it mixed things up with special events, and its remained in my PS3 for the last 2 months.
9.0
Online
The online is great, the community is great, but lacks dedicates servers.
Overall
8.9
jidery5601d ago

Sorry for the wall of text, there is just so much to this game that it would be impossible to review every aspect of this game without writing a book.

Information Minister5600d ago

Great review. Personally, I think GT5 is a diamond in the rough. It has its fair share of flaws, but all is forgiven when you take your car to the track. The driving is just superb!

GT5 would make an excellent starting point for GT6 as a PS4 launch title. PD can recycle the physics engine, track geometry, premium cars and the outstanding lighting engine. They just need to iron out the small problems and add content. With the extra processing power, it would be easy to fix stuff like the shadows, while improving texture/track detail and making it true 1080p v-synced.

justinb15600d ago

Yeah the 500,000 poly cars (of which there are 273, should be fine to only add another 60 or so. After all this time I still only have 70 premiums :/) could easily be recycled for a ps4 Gran Turismo. The level of detail is amazing - no other racing game on any platform has ever achieved the quality that premium cars in GT5 have

ABizzel15596d ago

GT5 was mixed for me as well. It literally took me 5 hours before I could even play the game. There's a 650MB patch you have to download first, then you have to install it, then you have to create your profile.

Then you have to get your license, and play through the trails at the beginning as well.

The beginning almost ruined it for me. But once you get past that, it's a great game. I just couldn't believe you had to do all that just to get into the game. I guess it mattered to me, because I don't get a lot of time to play games, and here I have a day off, and can't play it until later on in the day. But again GT5 is a great game, once you actually get into it. I recommend to people who don't have a lot of time to buy the PSP version and transfer the cars over so you can make progress.

RedDead5601d ago

I will read later, i'm far too tired, but I agree with the ups and downs, about 30% of the game is truely AMAZING, such as that highway track, absolutely amazing looking. But Some are absolutely terrible, the spectators vary being great to terrible. Standard cars are average looking at best...

As for gameplay, I couldn't be happier with it. no complaints. Except the Ai sometimes, but regularly I don't mind, they seem very robotic sometimes...

Menu is another thing that stands out as terrible, do I really need accept a prize after I win it? With a 30 second long intro to the car? Really for every one? It's just too slow and annoying. Too tedious.

hennessey865600d ago

Im loving gt5 for all its flaws

Information Minister5600d ago

That highway track you mentioned, it wouldn't by any chance be Special Stage Route 7, would it? The first time I raced there, I was using cockpit view in a Lamborghini Gallardo... My jaw still hurts for hitting the floor so hard.

RedDead5600d ago

Yeah that's it, it really just looks unbelieveable. Possibly the finest looking thing in gaming.

I agree with your first bubble post aswell, it is brillant, but a review takes into account everything including all tracks in the game. The flaws aren't that bad, they can be overlooked easily due to the games driving etc. I feel like GT5 is GT6 and Gt4 mixed together, Gt6 can reuse that track and try to get te rest of the game up to that standard.

Kon5600d ago

Agreed. The game looked like it was rushed. If they took their times to polish the game more...

CernaML5599d ago

You're gonna need to play the game before making a claim like that. Otherwise you just look dumb.

Kon5599d ago

You know if i played the game or not? Shut up man.

CernaML5598d ago

ROFL Your past comments make it obvious that you don't even own a PS3. Don't try to hide that fact.

mushroomwig5598d ago (Edited 5598d ago )

GT5...rushed? I must be in the twilight zone.

I can't stand 8.9 scores, is it really so hard to just say 9.0?

90°

PlayStation 3: chasing the 1080p dream, part three - Gran Turismo 5 and the indie explosion

From Digital Foundry: "Welcome to the third part in the biggest DF Retro episode we've ever produced - a year-by-year look at how 1080p gaming fared on the PlayStation 3. Launched in 2007 touting its then-exclusive HDMI digital interface, Sony layered full HD gaming on top of its Cell processor and RSX 'Reality Synthesizer' as key selling points for its third generation console. Of course, we all know how that turned out - both Sony and Microsoft machines routinely ran the most advanced titles at sub-720p resolutions, often with questionable performance, so what happened to the 1080p dream?

In the first two parts of John Linneman's investigation, we've covered off the first four years of the Triple's lifecycle and moving into 2010, the overall fortunes of the PlayStation 3 continued to improve. The platform holder released - what was then - the most advanced motion controller in the console space, backed up by experiments with stereoscopic 3D, which turned out to be a short-lived but still formidable pairing. Combined with a strong E3 showing, PS3 was looking good.

However, it's fair to say that it was a fallow year for 1080p gaming on the system, with only Scott Pilgrim Saves The World's razor-sharp pixel art upscaling, Castle Crashers and Soldner X2's 3D/FMV stylings accommodating full HD output - alongside a wonderful Monkey Island remaster."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ApocalypseShadow1393d ago (Edited 1393d ago )

Just remember ladies and gentlemen, Sony never said all games would be 1080p. Only that the system would support games up to 1080p in a survey before the system was released.
https://spong.com/article/9...
And as we saw, some games did support it, some games tried their best to support it and some games didn't or never reached it.

Is a higher resolution great to have if you can do it? Sure. Is it necessary for a fun game? No

But what I find interesting is Eurogamer. Are they really talking about HD and PS3 in their article or are they really pushing their 4.50 Euros 4K video download subscription? Seems one is being used to sell the other. Just look at the bottom of the article.

Michiel19891393d ago

thats what every company tries to do, push for people to buy their products. Are you really gonna blame them for that?

ApocalypseShadow1393d ago

Not all articles are about selling. They're about informing or entertaining.

Maybe I'm supposed to watch the video instead of reading. But I shouldn't have to click. But the article lazily tells us some games did hit 1080p and some didn't. I didn't learn anything new as I own the console. Then, they push a Patreon subscription.

Are you saying every opinion, preview, review and rant article requires a push to buy something now? Tell me which sites are prone to do so so that I can avoid them in the future.

Michiel19891393d ago

not everyone played during the ps3 era. I started during snes era but loved seeing articles/videos about how gaming evolved before that.

i dont think this article is trying to push you to get that patreon sub, it doesnt for me at least. I dont think theres anything wrong putting an ad at the bottom of the article. all the regular DF videos are free already.

SonyStyled1393d ago

Wipeout HD on PS3, a remake of the PS1 game was 1080p 60fps. And that released in 2007-08

Christopher1393d ago

This really feels like a filler article. I don't feel like I learned anything notable or substantial from this. I feel they could have reduced the unnecessary intro and over-explanation of things and put the whole series in one article for a more substantial and possibly informative piece rather than piece-mealing it out as they have.

dumahim1393d ago

It's more about the video. DF Retro videos are for Patreon members first, and I think the whole thing was one big video. For the youtube channel, it gets chopped up and released weekly.

ApocalypseShadow1393d ago

Chris is actually right on this one. Something known already was just kind of washed over in the article. Unless you're supposed to get more in the video. If more is in the video, then more could have been said in the article.

Only thing I learned new was that they are selling a subscription. My point though is that you gain more viewers by having better articles and content.

1390d ago
280°

What Happened To Gran Turismo?

When thinking about simulation racing games in this console generation, it’s not unreasonable for your first thought to be “Forza”. Microsoft’s first-party sim-racer series has been wildly successful, and for many of us, it’s been the go-to franchise for quite some time. But simulation racing games weren’t always synonymous with Forza; there was a time when Polyphony Digital’s hardcore series, Gran Turismo, reigned supreme. While the long-time franchise continues to sell exceptionally well, there’s no doubt that it isn’t the young, spry series it used to be.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
darthv722460d ago

It doesnt suck but I would love to see a return to form with GT7. Sport is such a departure that it can turn some people off. It has gotten better over time but it's still no match for a proper GT7.

Rude-ro2460d ago

Sport is awesome for what it is...
However, polygon built a whole new engine and the tech is still being worked on...
I understand it is easy to praise a cookie cutter because it release the same game over and over with rotations of maps and cars...
But this engine polygon has designed does more for things other than gaming.

Repetitive old engines with new makeup does not make anyone king.

Gt7 will be most likely in two years with 120fps and ray tracing because their new engines are ready now.

LordStig2460d ago

It decided to focus on racing rather than cars and in the gaming world, racing = gameplay.

Imalwaysright2460d ago

What complete and utter BS. GT has always focused on racing and gameplay.

2460d ago
neutralgamer19922460d ago

Good I guess selling millions of copies and have OFFICIAL FIA license races and Esports means it sucks

We just don't get it every year which is why ms also delayed next forza. You can't keep making yearly sequels. Quality and innovation takes time

GT sports at launch to now it's a different game and support has been free

Imalwaysright2460d ago

GT games have always sold millions of copies and what's so innovative about GT sport? It's a racing game FFS.

IRetrouk2459d ago

The online championships and tournaments alone offer more innovation than any racer this gen🤷‍♂️ then you also get the live ones in New York etc with proper race like commentary, something else no other sim has done before. It sells millions because it's the best, simple really.

Imalwaysright2459d ago (Edited 2459d ago )

IRetrouk

I'm not even sure why think that having proper like race commentary or championships and tournements is innovative but I'll play along... GT Sport was released in 2017 so how do explain that this video https://www.youtube.com/wat... from 2016 exists?

Dark_Knightmare22460d ago

Spoken like someone who hasn’t played sport

Imortus_san2459d ago

And those Paid demos, that fans try to hide and not talk about it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2459d ago
SCW19822460d ago

It became the best online racing community for console players and its an amazing achievment.

Keltech2460d ago

"Forza?" HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!! good joke!

kayoss2460d ago

Too early for an Aprils fool joke.

2460d ago
ElementX2460d ago

@solidgamerX That's really not very impressive. Somebody with an interest in cars plays racing games and becomes a race car driver. That's like saying "look at this guy, he played COD and now he's in the military"

Imalwaysright2460d ago

SolidGamerX

You must think that we're all stupid enough to believe that a game will turn anyone into a professional racing driver.

Prince-Ali2460d ago

FORZA!!! AAHAHHAHA !! Haven't i schooled you on this already before! You're still spewing nonsense on this threaddd looool

mcstorm2460d ago

Forza has always been better online than. GT and still is. Great to see PD try something different with GTS but let's face it this gen sonys racing games have been poor this then compaired to what Microsoft has had to offer. Forza 7 is one of the best racing games on xbox and pc but for me Horizon 3 and 4 have set the bar this gen. Of all the things microsoft got wrong this gen 2 of its racing games got a lot right and others are now playing catchup.

DarXyde2460d ago

It's debatable which is the better game. To me, Forza has the upper hand.

But in terms of online community and events? Ha. Don't lie to yourself just because you don't like Playstation.

2460d ago
2460d ago
Dark_Knightmare22460d ago

Lol not even close have you even played gt sport online?

Imalwaysright2460d ago (Edited 2460d ago )

SolidGamerX

You didn't need to confirm what I already knew: if you didn't think that we're all stupid you wouldn't make such stupid comments that only those that are dead from the neck up will agree with.

IRetrouk2459d ago (Edited 2459d ago )

Did he say gt could turn anyone into a racer? No he didnt, he asked what game has done it like gt has, which is true, gt academy done it throughout gt5 for a start. You need to do some research fella, cause your wrong.. again.

And lmao at element and the downplay, not even similar you crazy man, not even similar🤣 you realise gt has turned gamers into drivers from gt5? Go look at gt academy and tell me how that would be anything like someone playing cod and then joining the army, the downplay in gt articles is funny.

ElementX2459d ago

So you think he learned the required skills playing video games? I remember when people claimed children were learning how to operate guns because of video games, do you think that's also true?

IRetrouk2459d ago (Edited 2459d ago )

Two completely different things and you know it, it is a fact that gt has helped real gamers become real race drivers, the proof is easily available online and I'm not going round searching for links that has been posted many, many times before on this subject, Go and look at gt academy like I mentioned and you can see for yourself, they start out on gt and go from there, so yes the game gran turismo teaches you some driving techniques, now if you can find me a link where someone has been playing cod and went on to become a war hero, please let me know because I couldnt find anything, also do you have a link to where cod has a program to train soldiers? Like cod academy or something?, I couldnt find one of those either, maybe when you do then your comparison will actually make sense.

Imalwaysright2459d ago

IRetrouk

You mean the GT academy that provides training and licenses for a person to become a professional racing driver? The GT academy is how you go from being an average driving joe to become a professional racing driver not GT the game.

2459d ago
+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 2459d ago
2459d ago
xRacer74x2460d ago

Forza owns the racing game scene in my area as far as video games go.

dekke2460d ago

Forza = Arcade
GT= Sim

why u ppl keep comparing those 2 games every time..

Keltech2460d ago (Edited 2460d ago )

GT owns the console sim racing scene in my area and around the world. Just ask a real race car drivers

https://youtu.be/2pC3-eCAdv...

LordStig2460d ago

Forza isn't a racing game. It's a car game.

2460d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2460d ago
Hungryalpaca2460d ago

I’ll stick to sims. You keep playing with your hot wheels.

King_Noctis2460d ago

You forget that there are two Forzas, Forza Motorsport and Forza Horizon, which aims at different audiences.

King Nezz2460d ago

The usual response from someone insecure that feels their favorite racing game is nowhere near as good as it once was. I really liked Gran and played them all. Loved the Vector from part 2. But the franchise is not the same.

Gaming4Life19812460d ago

Yea Forza took over and is now the best sim racer with motorsport and the best arcade racer with horizon. GT was the best but it has been falling short for a long time and I'm not saying gt games are bad but no where near king like it used to be. I'd say forza motorsport 3 was the forza that really upped the franchise and forza 4 was when forza became #1.

I remember the glory days of gt but those days are long gone but it's still a good game just not the best. Of course ps fans will never admit it because they will die before giving MS credit.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2460d ago
Nacho_Z2460d ago

I do think they need some new creative heads in to give them some new perspectives, they seem stuck in a rut. It's a very high quality rut but they're still stuck in it.

LordStig2460d ago

The USA leg of the Gran Turismo World Tour is going on in New York right now. Go watch it guys, there's some damn good racing and crazy updates to come.

Nacho_Z2460d ago

I've seen some of it before and to be fair it's not much different to watching real motorsport so credit to them for that.

Heavenly King2460d ago

the MACH 5 :) GO SPEED rACEr!!

Show all comments (108)
320°

Gran Turismo 5, Gran Turismo 6, Wipeout HD, God of War 3 and more running on PC via the latest RPCS3

DSOGaming writes: "It appears that the best Playstation 3 emulator that is currently under development, RPCS3, received a new update recently. kd-11 has implemented new Surface Cache fixes to RPCS3 that reportedly improve the appearance of car reflections in Gran Turismo 6, and fix various graphics glitches in other games."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
2497d ago Replies(6)
gangsta_red2497d ago

If someone out there in internet land could make a decent PS3 emulator imagine what Sony could actually do if they put the time and effort in to make this happen for their next console?

It's definitely not impossible as we can see here. It should definitely be done since BC seems to be very important to Sony this next gen. Imagine PS+ free game offerings from Sony that could include the whole catalog from the PS console family..fantastic.

Silly gameAr2497d ago

Why waste time and money on it? Some people want to move forward, not go back.

Eonjay2497d ago

It's not a deal breaker but having the feature would be amazing. I would rather have it than not have it.

gangsta_red2497d ago

Not everyone feels that way and if Sony is making an issue of supporting PS4 games for PS5 why not support their other past games for people who still have them or a means to buy them and play them.

KwietStorm_BLM2497d ago

You literally just said some people. So I'd imagine you can comprehend that there's a larger subset of people not in that same "some" group. PlayStation used to be known for backward compatibility. Xbox made a big deal about support for their entire catalog. What's the issue with PlayStation, who has an even more substantial history in gaming, tapping into that market? We don't have this problem on PC. It's only a good thing for consumers to be able to bring their games with them through generations on console.

Silly gameAr2497d ago (Edited 2497d ago )

@kwietstorm

Yes, I said some people. What I said was MY opinion. I'm one of those people that couldn't care less about bc, but im not saying ALL people don't care about it. I think they should spend that time and energy for future features and games, but like I said, that's only my opinion.

Imortus_san2497d ago (Edited 2497d ago )

Not every body trows their games way every time the new gen cames along, and everybody that likes games like to be able to play their favorite games in the best possible way.

PS: Retrocompatability is the most requested feature in Sony Foruns, even Sony said so.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2497d ago
frostypants2497d ago (Edited 2497d ago )

The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile? Are the number of additional consoles PS3 BC would push be enough to justify the cost of developing the emulation (and it would have to be bullet proof)? I like the idea of having it, but for my part not having it won't effect my purchase decision.

2497d ago
Eonjay2497d ago

You are asking the right question but the wrong way. For me, the addition of PS3 BC would add value as a customer and make it even more likely for me to buy a PS5. If it is valuable to the customer it is valuable to them.

Also, the way they are doing it would be way cheaper than a program like Microsoft had. The are emulating the hardware. Not the software.

gangsta_red2497d ago

"The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile?"

Sony could definitely make some extra profit selling PS3 games through their marketplace (the same way they have their other classics available). It's not about whether or not it will effect anyone's purchase decision, it definitely didn't do so for the PS4. But as others have expressed, it would be a nice addition to have for PS5 if Sony could open up their whole library digitally and physically to users.

ShadowWolf7122497d ago

Racing games should be some of the easiest to emulate and they're still not hitting 60fps with it, to say nothing of image flickering and occasional sound issues.

Still gonna be a bit yet before they have it fully up and running, it seems, and even then it may only work for part of the library. :/

2497d ago Replies(2)
Gwiz2497d ago

Is it possible to have PS3 emulation on PS5?yes depending on what kind of power it really has.
An i7 9700k is no slouch and the PS4 already has a God of War 3 running much better with less
power required because they converted CBE to X86 which is not something you want to be doing in the long run.

What power would be required to play these games emulated at said PS4 version?.
It's not an easy situation Sony themselves created and ultimately I believe they are happy this way because they
want you to use PSNow,that service is why you will not even get it. (let's not forget that it was a huge investment)

2497d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (45)