Zapartha

Member
CRank: 5Score: 470

User Review : Destiny

Ups
  • Gun Play
  • Graphics
  • Smooth
Downs
  • Repetitive
  • Lack Of Story
  • Rnadom Loot Drops

Taking advantage of gamers?

Destiny, Bungies new IP since Halo has finally released and has got gamers either loving or hating it. Many spending countless hours on their search for lootz. Many just spending time wishing they didn't buy a digital copy(this guy right here!), so that it could be returned. However, lets take a look at it from an analytical and business prospective.

ACTIVISION ARE GENIUSES. This company has the largest profit margins of any production company in the business. Rightfully so, with games such as World Of Warcraft, Diablo 3, and Call Of Duty lining their pocket books, they have made making money look easy. Is Destiny the new cash cow for them and the way that games are headed? Pay full price for a game and buy expansions twice a year and hope that it will satisfy you? If you look at it from an economics perspective of the opportunity cost associated with buying the game how does it stack up? Lets answer these questions.

Destiny isn't a bad game at all, it is quite fun and gorgeous. The story is extremely short and leaves SO many gaps that it is almost non-existent. Sure, people will say well it leaves room for DLC and futre chapters of the game. Ok? Still doesn't tell me what happened with the traveler or where the Darkness came from. Who is this chick that keeps popping up? WHY AM I A WARLOCK? Come on now, tell me a story, make me feel immersed in my character.

The gun play, mechanics, handling, and core components of the game are flawless. I wouldn't expect anything less from Bungie, the game is smooth as silk and drives like a Lambo. The gameplay is repetitive to say the least, bosses are bullet sponges, and drops are non-existent and almost has you throwing your controller because you can't find a decent weapon. The PVP is great and extremely fun, sure some things need to change like Fusion Rifle 1 shots, NO SKILL INVOLVED. Balance issues are a hard thing to accomplish but that is just a lack of caring right there. I find most my time playing The Crucible because it is the only exciting part of the game to me.

The fact that there is an expansion coming in November is frightening. You mean to tell me that I payed $60 for this game and I have to pay more money 2 months later just to make it relevant? That is inexcusable and sheer greed. At least WoW does free updates adding new dungeons, raids, PvP, gear, etc. That is a good model and works and is part of the reason WoW is so big and keeps around 6 million subs. I know the argument is you pay 15 bucks a month though, yea we do, but it is worth it when you think of all the content that is added to the game keeping it somewhat fresh. Loot actually drops in that game. I think Destiny is a trial to how the community will take games like this, pay your 60 bucks and pay x-amount of dollars a year for expansions and hope it is worth it.

Lastly lets look at the opportunity cost of buying Destiny and the Expansion Pass. That is $100 of hard earned money. If you don't know what opportunity cost is, it is what you lose to gain something else. So for my $100 what do I lose to gain Destiny. I lose 2 pre-owned Wii U games such as Donkey Kong and Super Mario 3D world. Which are extremely fun games to play especially with your friends. You lose the ability to buy the new WoW expansion and 4 months of sub time, or being able to purchase say The Master Chief Collection and 40 McDoubles. What about Diablo 3-Reaper of Souls for Next-Gen? You lose the opportunity to buy and play it, which is a shame because it is extremely good on PS4/Xbox One and fun to play with friends on new difficulty levels.

Now, many will say how do we lose the ability to purchase these things. That is because money is consider a resource and resources are a scarcity. It doesn't mean that everyone only has $100 to spend but it is about what you lose in order to gain something if the only thing you had was $100.

Score
10.0
Graphics
Graphics are truly next gen.
10.0
Sound
The soundtrack is amazing
3.0
Gameplay
Repetitive. Extremely repetitive
4.0
Fun Factor
Fun for about the first 10 Hours.
6.0
Online
The online aspect is nice, having fireteams and being social. PvP is pretty decent.
Overall
6.6
thekhurg4224d ago

Terrible review and one that makes me question if this guy even understands how the MMO genre works.

DarkOcelet4232d ago

In terms of gameplay a 7 would be fair because it stands out from many fps shooters out but its fun factor is sort of fair because of the amount of repetitivity .

annoyedgamer4231d ago

Alot of people are still stuck on board the hype train long after it arrived. I will get Destiny but not at $60.

SaffronCurse4230d ago (Edited 4230d ago )

The gameplay is the absolute best thing about the game(gameplay meaning how tight the controls are) apart from the soundtrack that works well.

OmegaShen4230d ago

Your review fails, the loot system is getting fix this week. But I never had a problem.

DarkOcelet4230d ago

Its not only loot system that needs fixing , whats up with the pointless story and thats coming from Bungie , thats not a good sign . Thats a major downgrade from them .

OmegaShen4230d ago

What pointless story? Do you not understand what ten years of supporting it means?

It means you won't get the full story right way and the the dead ghost you find have a story to (if you go to Bungie's site).

DarkOcelet4230d ago

Really ? So they couldnt put their stories in the game and aside from the dead ghosts . Do you think its ok to get the full story by downloading something which should have been completed and in the same time you will probably have to pay for ? Things like this is not ok and you should not support such rippoff .

OmegaShen4229d ago

Its what so some mmo's do, you thinking of this as just a normal game that gives you the full story and be done with it.

Destiny isn't like that, plus I'm not paying for dlc. My copy had the pass with it.

Show all comments (14)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans456d ago (Edited 456d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr455d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast604d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

604d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris604d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

604d ago
anast604d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole604d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast604d ago (Edited 604d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

604d ago
anast604d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 604d ago
Profchaos604d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_604d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981604d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140604d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85604d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj604d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman604d ago (Edited 604d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake604d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn604d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg604d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07604d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

603d ago
Knightofelemia603d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 603d ago
Chevalier603d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom604d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac604d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake604d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark604d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde604d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125603d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)
140°

Ex Destiny and Halo Producer Says Live Service Is 'Better for Developers and Players'

A former Halo and Destiny executive producer has said the live service model is "so much better for developers and players" than the one-off $60 purchase model.

Christopher672d ago

Typically the best games of each year say otherwise.

Christopher672d ago

Alan Wake 2, BG3, Tears of the Kingdom, Elden Ring, GoW Ragnarok, Hades, Returnal, Fallout 4, Dishonored, It Takes Two, Untitled Goose Game, Breath of the Wild, both of The Last of Us, Ghost of Tsushima, Sekiro, Psychonauts 2, Control, Celeste, Super Mario Odyssey, Bloodborne, The Outer Wilds, The Witcher 3, Dragon Age: Inquisition, Cocoon, The Dredge, and more and more and more.

Up against Overwatch and Destiny as far as critical acclaim and recognition as 'better' for players.

And, let me be honest, even 'for developers' is a lie. Want to know why? Because it's only good for people who can pump out graphics constantly and not overall quest designers, coders, engine devs, etc.

What this guy means is "we can give a lot of cosmetic content to players, who we think players like more because people spend money on it, and it's best for us because we don't have to pay for a full team to create a new game and just the people to pump out new graphics from one season to another." In no way is his comment a true reflection of what is 'better for players' let alone 'better for the industry stability over longer periods of time.'

This is more investor mindset focusing on maximizing profits by getting consumers to buy less for more while they spend less making it. That's it.

You know what's best for players? Newer, better, and more content that is good and not just cosmetic. Live service isn't that unless you pay $60 a year to them to add more for it (like Destiny and CoD do). Then you might get some improvements and new content. Even then? Not usually.

just_looken672d ago

In terms of player feedback/awards yes but the list you made are all nothing in terms of profit.

Call of duty mobile alone laughs at that list that game is a billion dollar money making machine.

Toss in your apex/mmo/rivals/fortnight/robl ox/minecraft monoploy go or back to console with elder scrolls fallout 76.

Basically there is alot more live service style games that hit or go above the billion dollar mark than your list and that is what the people at top want cold hard cash. Heck alot fo them make a billion + a year

Gta 5 single player profit vs gtao profit as a example now that ps5/series has gtao as a free standalone with gta + there printing cash like its going out of style over there.

Christopher671d ago (Edited 671d ago )

Being more profitable isn't better for the consumer or developers. That's better for executives in suits.

just_looken671d ago

@Christopher

Umm exactly who do you think pay's the bill's and hands out the games budgets?

They have 0 care about a games award's/feedback its all profit driven some use to care like sony back in the day now its profit first.

0 likes shows how many are still on copium thinking the big publishers care about them

aaronaton672d ago (Edited 672d ago )

Well the Poll on the website is suggesting he is massively wrong and out of touch.
A big majority of the vote going to "I prefer one off purchases with paid expansions"

Couldn't agree more.

Inverno672d ago

I'll always think the concept is awesome. Back during the PS3 era I pictured a Spider-Man game that would be the traditional open world swinging playground that they typically are but every comic issue would be turned into dlc. It'd be the entirety of the Amazing line, 2 to 3 issues at a time, turnt to dlc until the entire Amazing line is told in form of a game. That concept eventually made it to the industry and they have consistently fk'd it up with every game that has been made as a "service".

jznrpg672d ago

There is nothing like sitting down , popping in a great single player game and blocking out the world.

OtterX672d ago

Sometimes I like to log into Fortnite and Call of Duty and just sit and listen to 12 years call me a n*****, f**, m***** f***** just so I can remember why I like to play single player games.

GhostScholar672d ago

Not for players over the age of 12

Show all comments (18)