Platinumed Demons Souls :D
CRank: 5Score: 29340

User Review : Crysis 2

Ups
  • Amazing Multiplayer
  • Huge fun factor
  • Despite negatives enjoyable game
Downs
  • Graphical problems
  • Glitches
  • Stupid AI

Been looking for an in depth gritty review of what Crysis 2 is all about check this out

So Crysis 2 has arrived on all 3 platforms and after picking it up for my PS3 Friday I have completed the game on Super Soldier difficulty and sunk a good few hours into the multiplayer, so here is my review of Cryteks sequel to the original Crysis and their first venture onto the home console Crysis 2

Let’s start with a key highlight to what Crysis 2 has to live up to, and the legacy left behind Crysis, the amazing graphics. For weeks upon weeks leading up to the launch Crysis 2 was to be crowned king of the console in terms of graphics as well as king of all multiplats in terms of evenness. The latter has seemingly been achieved with a freakishly close resemblance between the PS3 and the 360 version (for a full comparison to see for yourself check out Digital Foundry’s comparison) however it has to be said that Crysis 2 has not taken the graphical throne for the best looking console game. Of course this boils down to the definition of ‘Graphics’ which comes under a few categories such as, artistic style, variety of areas, consistency and screen resolution. The artistic style has been done very well in Crysis 2, a ravaged New York city has some great lighting and uses a range of coulors well in order to make the city believable, most to all of the game takes place in this city environment and while the game has breath taking parts of beauty the consistency is where the problems lay. The maps and mission areas you are placed in are big and because of this some areas simply do not look as great as others this isn’t a massive problem in itself but when added to the massive and constant pop in of graphics the immersion begins to get ruined. As you move deeper into levels the world has to take a second to catch up and the graphics do too weather your creeping around in stealth or charging through in armor mode the game is often playing catch up. It does not do have to do this all of the time and sometimes does it much more subtly than other times it does take something away from the graphics. Added to this is a blurriness factor when moving the camera around fast a touch to much of blur sometimes comes into play almost trying to compensate as the graphics pop in, this did not ruin my experience of the game and was more just a little annoyance along the way and at no point did the sub HD resolution bother me, when the game came together and worked perfectly it did look amazing however even at this peak I believe Killzone 3 is still a better looking game. Also an annoying almost constant technical issues is the frame rate it’s not locked at 30fps and I really feel it at times this is consistently there and I feel it through both single and multiplayer it’s not a deal breaker but I’d kill for a 60fps locked rate like possible on the PC version.

There are the key regular mechanics as you would expect in an FPS different weapons, aiming down the sights and health recovery after so long not being shot etc. What makes Crysis 2 different is the nano suit this gives the wearer enhanced abilities such as being able to take a load of bullets (armor mode) and to become invisible for a period of time (stealth mode) as well as this the suit has modules these act as in game perks there are 4 separate categories with 4 mods in each however only one of each category can be active at any time, these are unlocked through nanosuit points that are obtained from fallen Ceph enemies

The pop in graphics were not the only annoyance along my way of playing through the game, there were frequent and many bugs and glitches throughout. These provided a bigger inconvenience and a feeling of being cheated more than any graphic problems. Imagine the scene charging into the enemies, armor mode engaged you aim down the sight and unleash a full clip into the Ceph now to dash away reload and recharge but wait . . . I’m still aiming down the sights I can’t sprint or move very fast desperately now trying to get away from the hording Ceph but I cannot due to being stuck aiming, two things could happen 1) repeatedly tapping L1 sometimes sorts the problem or 2) I get killed and then its back to last checkpoint as normal. This problem was only found in the Single player I had no such trouble in the multiplayer, yet it made me play the game making sure I reloaded before I had too so I would not become stuck (provided the gun would reload as on rare occasions despite having ammo it refused to happen only happened once or twice to me though). Also in single player when swapping between firing modes on your gun or between shot gun and regular fire the weapon gets stuck in one mode and requires you to pull out some C4, or other equipment, and then go back to your primary weapon in order for it to work as normal. Another problem with customizing was with the scopes, I had a few times where I equipped the Assault 3X zoom scope and when aiming was completely invisible (not cloaked) just gone but it still zoomed in and fired like the sight was there (this also happened once to me on multiplayer) it would eventually appear but sometimes after the desire to use it had gone. Picking up weapons of the floor even becomes a challenge at times even tactical advised weapons sometimes would not be able to be prompted to be picked up, in a tight low ammo situation this killed me a few times and required me at times to run back and forth between weapons until one would work. These were only some of the bugs I encounter but they all happened frequently while I also had problems with stealth kills and enemies glitching through walls these were less frequent and frustrating than the main glitches I mentioned

Enough rabbiting about the technical stuff lets get onto the gameplay, and let me start of by saying if you’re expecting an open world FPS then look somewhere else because Crysis 2 is not it. While the game is not 100% linear as such it does not allow you to do anything how you want, you can power through your own path with armor mode, sneak round the enemies with stealth mode or follow the step by step guide given to you by the tactical visor. The best comparison to be made to Crysis 2 in terms of level design and choice is Metal Gear Solid 4. Crysis 2 holds similar values to MGS4 you start at point A you have to get to point B and while it kinda leaves it up to you it sometimes forces you to do it how it was designed. It leads you through a series of bottlenecks which open out into larger areas at these points you get an audio and visual cue to open up your visor and scan the area for a numbered guide on how to do it. Example, point 1 ‘Flank’ Point 2 ‘Stealth kill’ Point 3 ‘Acquire/take/use’ there simple commands and I never really followed them as it seemed like holding your hand a little too much instead I approached the situation as I saw fit which is where the customizable weapons and the suits extra module abilities as well as the cloak and armor really come into play and give you a touch of choice. The whole thing however is damn near ruined by the AI and their settings. Sneak in cloaked go under cover check my blind spots and make sure no enemies can see uncloak to charge and the alert meter (a meter that tells you how alert the enemies are to your present duh) shoots up as bullets start flying over my head and a enemy comes round knowing my position, this happened about half the time I went into cover and uncloaked and it was hugely frustrating the AI continue to be freakishly detective when there half aware of where you are (alert bar in yellow about half way) even with the silent footsteps mod on you can be cloaked and its like their being magnetically pulled to you they don’t know where you are but will side step their path straight into your direction forcing you to keep moving as eventually they’ll all swarm around you. As well as this there are certain times in the game where you have to hold down a position, in these times I found that the half the enemies would just stand back near where they spawned until you go and attack them to lure them out, because of this it can be easier to deal with a wave of enemies as there not really attacking properly. Despite the AI and glitches I actually ended up enjoying the SP to some degree the story wasn’t massively unpredictable but did twist in unpredictable ways at certain times I wasn’t too fussed about the story wrapping up but the end of the game felt satisfying to finish. As for length I finished the game on the hardest mode in 6 hours 27 minutes and 17 seconds

I have saved the best for last, the multiplayer, this is just fun and addicting it has the regular level up and exp with challenges weapon unlocks and all similar to most FPS’s but what makes Crysis 2 so amazing online is the gameplay and the nanosuit, running sliding and shooting taking out invisible people and switching to armor mode and spinning around to kill your attacker is fast heart pumping and best of all fun, the game modes are similar to other games but all hold their ground well as the nanosuit provides a different way to play and approach the situation, each game mode also has variations on that mode, so team instant action (team deathmatch) can be played ‘standard’ all normal ‘solo’ no squads allowed ‘classic’ as in no powers or ‘hardcore’ which is a hardcore type style. Multiplayer is where the fun is for me and to me will certainly be lasting a while which is good as its actually a trophy (dedication – play 6 months online after your first game) I can’t sing Crysis 2 praises for multiplayer high enough and it easily makes it onto my top FPS games list, in a sentence its like Halo and CoDs love child and its brilliant

Overall then this is a tough to rate game, the graphics while beautiful struggle with pop ins and frame rate issues the game is filled with bugs and a stupid AI but with an amazing Multiplayer mode it’s a perplexing one as on many technical levels I believe Killzone 3 is better however after playing both I decided to buy Crysis 2 and have not looked back so my rating is going to be very split and I will answer any questions in the comments or via PM and based from this review what do you think the game deserves or if you played it and want to justify something that’s fine too, I’ll respond to comments if you ask me a question or bring up a point ASAP

Score
8.0
Graphics
Lowered because of the pop ins and did not quite deliver on the best graphics on a console claim
7.5
Sound
Music is good but repetitive and guns kinda all sound similar (forgot to mention in review some sound glitch where no sound while firing quite rare)
8.8
Gameplay
Solid game play apart from the framrate which takes a little bit away but plays solidly enough
9.7
Fun Factor
Again frame rate just pinching it here but still Crysis 2 is easily one of the most fun FPS's I've played in a while
9.7
Online
Main cause of the fun factor
Overall
8.6
D3athc3ll5458d ago

uhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmm

Its def not the best looking console game!

Killzone 3 looks better
God of War 3 looks better
Uncharted 2 looks alot better!

i can only imagine why u got one bubble!

pr0digyZA5458d ago

Have to agree with Kon, even though you say the graphics aren't as good as those games, it's still up there with the top games. (I have it on PC but I'm talking about console version now)

PhoenixDevil5458d ago

hey man thanks for not being troll-y or fanboyish about it. Its up for serious debate and it has caused a lot of talk I agree that some parts look as good as Killzone 3 and similar graphical level games but as an overall package on consoles it doesnt deliver, to me anyway maybe it was the hype but the bugs and pop ins do not help its case and yes I do believe its the best looking multiplat and best looking on the 360, though Gears beta footage I saw from IGN earlier looks really good and Infamous 2 and uncharted 3 are all coming so the graphic crown may get passed about a bit

Slightly random here but am I the only one who sees Crysis 2 as lyk a FPS soul cousin of MGS4 ?

Bathyj5453d ago (Edited 5453d ago )

I guess when talking about graphics you cant just talk about when everything running nice and looks good. Standing still watching the sun set over the ocean is not a true indicator.

Like PhoenixDevil said, you need to look at the total package, especially if you think you going to take the crowd of being unanimously hailed as graphics king.

Killzone, Uncharted and God of War are all considered the best looking console games, not just because they are pretty in screen shots, but because they are very polished too, with very little glitching, bugs or performance issues.

They are all, very high quality, total packages.

PS
Can I just say this for everyone, because I keep noticing this problem, if your going to write a review or blog, please use more paragraphs.

PhoenixDevil5453d ago

Yes the graphical prowess of a game is the overall package, something like Killzone 3 and God of war etc handles well

As for your PS its a fair point, for any future reviews or blogs I will try and use paragraphs better, using sub headings and then separate paragraphs in those sub headings prob will make it look neater and easier to read - I may write a review for Motorstorm apocalypse as any American uses on this site wont have it yet if I do I'll use that paragraph system, thanks for the feedback :)

SanMarco5458d ago

pretty good game. I enjoyed it. Exceeded my expectations.

Good review ( Ups & Downs is the only thing I look at on Reviews) lol. but ye, good review.

PhoenixDevil5458d ago

Thanks man and nice handling of the troll :P

ultimate-remag5457d ago

got some rat poison 2 feed da troll lol... gr8 review... good game gets kinda boring in between tho...

Show all comments (16)
40°

Our Story – Episode 2 – Crysis 2 to Ryse: Son of Rome

Crytek : In episode two of Our Story, the team discusses the evolution of Crysis into Crysis 2 and 3 (and the pressures that came with it), how a local connection landed an incredible collaboration with legendary composer Hans Zimmer, and the New York trip that inspired much of Crysis 2. For the gladiators among you, you’ll also get an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at the development of Ryse: Son of Rome and the attention to detail that went into it.

130°

Crysis 2 Revisited: The Console Effect

The sequel to one of PC's most celebrated exclusives went multi-platform, with a huge impact to CryEngine technology and the core make-up of the game. Join Alex and John for an extended chat about what the title meant to them, how the console versions stacked up and how CryEngine evolved for multi-platform development.

Read Full Story >>
digitalfoundry.net
PrinceOfAnger2829d ago

Pc version still comparable to new games.

annoyedgamer2829d ago

Crysis 2 was the beginning of EA's influence on Crytek. Not only was the multiplayer full of bugs at launch (still has today) but the entire game both SP and MP was redesigned to cater to the call of duty crowd. 3 kills - UAV, 7 kills, overhead gunship, etc.

Asuka2829d ago

Agreed with the sentiments of the video. Can consoles at the time run Crysis? Technically no. Unless ~14fps is acceptable as "being able to run Crysis." Other games at the time, KZ2/KZ3 ran (locked 30fps) and look much better (albeit horrible FOV). Result of a first party engine tailored made for the hardware, and an engine made with compromises to get a game to "run" on consoles, and at the end of the day gimp the PC version leaving Crysis 2 feeling... lacking. DX11 patch helped though, but no getting around that weak AI.

2829d ago
PUBG2829d ago

This game was okay I guess, but paled in comparison to the first game. The multiplayer was a better experience, but the single player didn't really feel right to me. I also didn't like the music that they went with in the game, I found it to be kind of annoying. I was so disappointed with the single player campaign, that I didn't even bother with the 3rd game.

Show all comments (7)
660°

Seven IPs That Can Save Xbox

Zach from WellPlayed writes about seven IPs that Xbox should turn to solve its exclusive problem

Read Full Story >>
well-played.com.au
brettbatley2866d ago

I’ll take a new Streets of Rage, Dino Crisis and Crysis from that list. TimeSplitters would be cool but can’t see it happening

2866d ago Replies(3)
robtion2866d ago

I think a big new, must play, ip would help.

Original Xbox had halo.

Xbox360 had Gears.

X1 hasnt got one so far.

combatcash2866d ago

Sequel to Alan wake, sequel to Ryse, sequel to sunset overdrive, find a way to release scalebound that game looked insane, release Fable 4. A new Up or two to mix things up and boom, you can revitalize the system. Naturally these games have to be of high quality

SkippyPaccino2866d ago

The worst part is that they paid for both those exclusives... Wasn't even in house. Not even sure what Xbox has brought to the game besides new age online on console...

MrSec842866d ago (Edited 2866d ago )

They need a bunch, at least one across every major genre that can provide differences to established multiplats and their competitors franchises.

Something with logical thought out systems, that make for a believable and solid experience, genre defining, made by teams people trust would be great.

They haven't earned their place in the market, they've been riding on the back of people they've bought with money, instead of supporting the industry and giving back to the gamers with what makes this hobby fun, good experiences that take people somewhere in their imagination.

Sony and Nintendo do that, as do multiple devs outside of those companies.

MS should remove Phil Spencer from leadership, hire someone who knows videogames and can actually do something with the resources available at Microsoft.

Someone with a backbone, who will fight to build Microsoft Studios into a truly respected game maker, not a spoilt child, riding around the industry with their Parent's hard earned money.

Kavorklestein2866d ago (Edited 2866d ago )

I personally Consider QB and Ryse and Halo 5 to be must play games.
And Ori and the Blind Forest.

Whether or not these some of these games are on PC or not is irrelevant, since you Listed OG Halo, which was on PC, and OG gears, which was on PC. (with added content no less)

As Far as "New" is Concerned. Yeah I think QB's ending was underwhelming, but other than that, it was a Fantastic game that deserves more love than Hate.
Regardless of what Critics say.

Critics Loved the Movie: "it Follows" and "Get out" and I despised every second of those Films.
A Critic's POV is only half the equation.
Sometimes you gotta just see for your self.

DVAcme2865d ago (Edited 2865d ago )

@Combatcash
Microsoft needs NEW IPS, rehqshing old ones ad nauseum is part of the problem! Also...
-Sequel to Alan Wake: There already was one, didn't make much of a blip.
-Sequel to Ryse: I don't see how a sequel to a mediocre game can help Microsoft any.
-Sequel to Sunset Overdrive: Microsoft didn't give SO the marketing it deserved and the game suffered as a result. I don't see Insomniac risking making another one unless MS paid them MASSIVE amounts of money. Also, Insomniac is making PS4 Spider-Man, and that's gonna be one of Sony's tentpole games this year, so Insomniac doesn't need to work for MS.
-Find a way to release Scalebound that game looked insane: MS CANCELED Scalebound, so that is dead on the water, and I seriously doubt Platinum is very eager to work on a MS exclusive anymore.
-Release Fable 4: I don't trust Peter Molyneux no make me a sandwich, let alone a new game. Face it, the Fable franchise became more mediocre with every game, and Western role playing games have advanced way beyond Fable's concept. Fable 4 would just seem like a crappy unimaginative clone of The Witcher 3 at this point.

Seriously, MS needs innovation, not dipping into the well again and again expecting players not to get bored of the same ol' same ol'.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2865d ago
oasdada2866d ago

None of these games have anything to do with the xbox brand. Making these kind of exclusive deals wont help MS but would be the case of TR exclusivity Again. XBOX Needs to make its oen identity with new ip and good sequels to games they have under their belt.. Not just throw cash at any random franchise and make it hostage to their console!

mark_parch2866d ago

it's so simple. just do a banjo and kazooie remake along the lines of the recent crash games that would be a guaranteed success. do whatever it takes to make a kotor 3 or kotor remake another guaranteed success

Str8Chaos742866d ago

Would love a new Crysis game on any platform. The first game was awesome.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2865d ago
Heelix2866d ago

Save Xbox from what?

A platform that just reported growth . .
. . that just made MS billions in its last financial report?

oh you mean you'd like to see more exclusives games. .
Fix your headline then?

I'd like to see an increased volume of varied and diverse content coming to the box. They don't necessarily have to from First Party only. A few collaborations here and there.

Smart investments in both SP and MP content.

quenomamen2866d ago

No yea the Xbox is doing great! No MS got into this business to sell half of what the competitors sell, yes they prefer it that way actually. Denile is strong like bull.

Heelix2866d ago (Edited 2866d ago )

Okay
So we are trying to save Xbox from the competition?

If they released as many AAA games as their rival and still didn't sell as many consoles
Would they still need saving?

Xbox is its own benchmark - they've done 80 mill in the past and had even more AAA games than XO

They just need to match or outdo themselves again

Also the current gen is a wrap.

2866d ago
Gaming_1st2866d ago

@Heelix

Your avatar is very fitting. In the hardware business you need to see growth, in order to get returns on the money you're spending. The reason MS is starting to move over into these paid subscriptions is cause the return is very great. MS lost billions trying to compete in the console market and due to the fact that just recently starting to see a profit. If MS can not sell you a xbox, then no paid subscriptions. You bring up 80 million 360 sold, but how many was multiple's to the same person? I mean a 56% failure rate is a lot. So that coincides with only 40+ million xbox live "members" at the time of the 360. That's "members" and not subscribers. So if you made multiple accounts on console that counted as a "member".

So unfortunately as much as you try to downplay. Technically they need to see a growth and not in the red like they have been most of MS console life.

trooper_2866d ago (Edited 2866d ago )

Who cares how much money they made. What are they doing with it?!

Okay, I guess you can stuff hundred dollar bills in an XB1 and games will miraculously show up on the screen then.

How much does Microsoft pay you for nonsense talk?

UltraNova2866d ago (Edited 2866d ago )

Exactly. Why should any gamer care if a Company makes money in a way it doesn't do service to us? Is all that money beeing reinvested in new IPs? No, in MS's case they imvest that money on more services which are solely created to extract even more money from us with minal effort and resources on their part.

Thats what MS is doing at the moment.

Jinger2866d ago

Actually that $100 bill would pay for almost a year of GamePass so they gave you 150 games for a year. Or you could buy a game or two from the marketplace. I'd like them to bundle it with a $100

Gaming_1st2866d ago

@Jinger

You're the exact person MS wants owning a Xbox....

optimus2865d ago

Wait until e3 and you'll see what they did with it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2865d ago
2866d ago Replies(1)
Bobafret2866d ago (Edited 2866d ago )

But when your closest competitor is outselling you over a 2:1 ratio, it's still a problem. If Sony were only ahead by 10-15 million units I might agree with you, but consumer perception is a big deal and has legs. Bad news travels fast and this kills brands.

showtimefolks2866d ago (Edited 2866d ago )

Xbox one won't get no where near Xbox 360 sales which were inflated due to RROD anyway. They are compared against playstation and Nintendo

Releasing more games will never ever hurt so stop the nonsense. Yall are so pathetic instead of asking for more yall are settling for far less and asking others to expect less

The only reason ms and Xbox team so quite is because they are more than 40 million behind the best console in gaming today

Again stop this nonsense demand more don't settle for less

Bobafret2866d ago

"Xbox one won't get no where near Xbox 360 sales which were inflated due to RROD anyway"

Years later people still perpetuate this falsehood. The RROD boxes were replaced under the 3 year warranty and did not count towards sales.

showtimefolks2865d ago

boba

maybe check your facts early on MS didn't' admit to having these issues it was until later when MS gave the 3 years warranty. There are many gamers who had to buy the xbox360 more than once. All this so they can say they got to the market first and had a early start

Heelix2866d ago

I think some of you are slow or maybe you just see what you want to see. Did you miss this part:

"I'd like to see an increased volume of varied and diverse content coming to the box. They don't necessarily have to from First Party only. A few collaborations here and there.

Smart investments in both SP and MP content."

The part where we all agree they need to do more?

so what do they need saving from? They're the only ones who can improve their situation.

In trouble they definitely aren't which is why I mentioned their growth in the gaming division.

2866d ago
Kryptix2866d ago (Edited 2866d ago )

Their mission is to profit the most out of one single individual person over many.

You pump out services and microtransactions. Soon, you'll see it become multi tiered. They'll maybe even help you rent out DLCs in the future for a higher premium.

What do exclusives need to become successful? A large amount of consoles sold so they're opting in on stacking multiple layers of money with the lowest number ratio aka the least people.

They're hush hush with a dead end trail, but I got it figured out. This is why you'll never see the same amount of new first party IPs compared to the rest.

The Xbox you knew is done. Jump ship for any of the much better alternatives.

Gaming_1st2866d ago

@Heelix

Diverse content is a blanket statement. Yay, more subscription based things....Yay for me. Xbox division has been in trouble since the beginning. They have lost billions upon billions over the course of the original xbox and xbox 360. Investors was wanting MS to sell the Xbox division and move on. MS is betting the house on selling everyone on subscription based services. Minimal cost for them and huge returns. But in order to do that, they need more people buying xbox's and subscribing to their services.

trooper_2866d ago

Maybe you need to read closely yourself.

Real, diversifying games is what will save the XBox brand from dying. Multiplats and games like Sea of Thieves won't cut it.

That's what the article is referring to.

2866d ago
DivineAssault 2866d ago (Edited 2866d ago )

MS can report growth is because of microtransactions and subscriptions.. The xbox division is losing consumer confidence BIG TIME.. You think they came up with game pass because they like us? Look at how well sea of theives sold btw.. Thats sad because of how thirsty their customers were for a new game only to get stabbed in the back with another one of their schemes. Keeping people paying into that game as they make more DLC to sell you.. Whats even more sad is when they see the sales data, theyre going to think customers want that kind of stuff.. A sequel or more games with that structure will follow..

Inzo2866d ago

If I am not mistaken the growth they reported is year over year for the month of March, not annual growth and not profit. As far as I know the only company to have reported profit for their console is Sony.

CaptainOmega2866d ago

I guess Xbox owners like mediocre content... how sad.

spartan112g2866d ago

Shhh, you can’t say such things here. You’ll get attacked by the Sony fanboys swimming around in these waters.

The Wood2865d ago (Edited 2865d ago )

'I'd like to see an increased volume of varied and diverse content coming to the box. They don't necessarily have to from First Party only. A few collaborations here and there'

I can agree with that bit. They should be doing better for such a cash rich player. This is their 3rd gen. . . They're not rookies anymore.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 2865d ago
RuleNumber52866d ago

Let's be honest, their big guns will debut on the next Xbox.

zackeroniii2866d ago

lol c'mon are you for real? do you really believe that? you guys barely got any new IP on the xbox 360 and if they were they were lackluster. same goes for xbox one. can't believe people will still have hope and will continue to show support for this paperweight console and this garbage corporation.

combatcash2866d ago

@zackeroniii, mass effect, gears of war, Alan wake, lost oddissey, blue dragon and mass effect are a few I can think of, and they were all high quality. Not all of them sold well, but IMO they were great fucking games

Kryptix2866d ago

Mass Effect also came out on PS3 and a majority of those IPs were left behind a very long time ago.

Xbox has so few "main line" franchises or IPs that have that power to bring a successful sequel while PlayStation is building and growing like recent God of War and soon Last of Us 2. Even expect that Spiderman game to have a trilogy.

That's why PS4 is selling like hot cakes consistently because gamers know they're getting hardware that is properly backed and not shallow.

DigitalRaptor2865d ago (Edited 2865d ago )

Microsoft tends to front-load their consoles at the start of a gen, it's just that they dwindle significantly as the years go by.

I don't know why you think they won't have a decent start.

bluefox7552866d ago

What makes you think, especially after this gen, that they even have any "big guns"?

StifflerK2866d ago

Nice list, I'm still surprised Timesplitters hasn't been brought back in some form (remake or sequel).

My 7 would be:

Old IPs:
1) PGR5
2) Conker's Bad Fur Day 2
3) Fable 4
4) Perfect Dark 3

New IPs
5) Killer Instinct Vs Mortal Kombat
6) A new action game by Itagaki-san ( the guy who made Ninja Gaiden)
7) A new cinematic AAA action adventure game.

Apart from Fable 4 - I doubt any of the others will happen , but still it'd be nice to see something like this happen at E3.

Xack2866d ago

Yeah I did think of Perfect Dark and Battletoads. But as both are Rare games I didn't include them. Would love both though.

Conkers is a good call. I didn't even think of that one!

Yeah I'd kill for a new TimeSplitters

2866d ago Replies(2)
CyberSentinel2866d ago

1. Fable 4
2. Blue Dragon 2
3. Alan Wake 2
4. Splinter Cell Reset series

brettbatley2866d ago

Alan Wake 2 is a great call

Universal 082866d ago

Im with you on PGR5 100%, been waiting for that game since Microsoft bought the IP after Bizarre went bye bye.

oasdada2866d ago

I dont understand one thing.. Need good exclusive level games that a step above mist third party games? Why not just get a Ps4?

StifflerK2866d ago (Edited 2866d ago )

I have a PS4 ( and Xbox, PC + Wii U)
MS does have a lot of decent IPs that could be great IPs - unfortunately most of them never get sequels.
I really want to see them invest more in their first party games and studios.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2866d ago
2866d ago Replies(4)
Show all comments (144)